Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-commander ≥ 6

2020-12-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-12-23 13:06:40) > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-23 12:28:53) > > Le 23/12/2020 à 12:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-23 11:34:41) > > >> node-commander 6 is ready in experimental. It seems that all is > > >> OK, except a little change in

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-commander ≥ 6

2020-12-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Xavier (2020-12-23 12:28:53) > Le 23/12/2020 à 12:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-23 11:34:41) > >> node-commander 6 is ready in experimental. It seems that all is OK, > >> except a little change in uglifyjs.terser help output detected by > >> your Perl test. >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-commander ≥ 6

2020-12-23 Thread Xavier
Le 23/12/2020 à 12:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Hi Xavier, > > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-23 11:34:41) >> node-commander 6 is ready in experimental. It seems that all is OK, >> except a little change in uglifyjs.terser help output detected by your >> Perl test. >> I posted a simple MR, could you

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-commander ≥ 6

2020-12-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Xavier, Quoting Xavier (2020-12-23 11:34:41) > node-commander 6 is ready in experimental. It seems that all is OK, > except a little change in uglifyjs.terser help output detected by your > Perl test. > I posted a simple MR, could you see if this is acceptable (compatible > with node-commander

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-commander ≥ 6

2020-12-23 Thread Xavier
Hi Jonas, node-commander 6 is ready in experimental. It seems that all is OK, except a little change in uglifyjs.terser help output detected by your Perl test. I posted a simple MR, could you see if this is acceptable (compatible with node-commander 5)? Xavier -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing