[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#934730: RM: node-yawl -- ROM; orphaned upstream - FTBFS

[Xavier Guimard]

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi all,

node-yawl never entered to testing due to FTBFS. Issue posted to
upstream [1], but nobody answers. node-yawl has no reverse dependencies.

That's why I propose to remove it from Debian

Cheers,
Xavier

[1]: https://github.com/andrewrk/node-yawl/issues/5

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#934734: RM: libv8-3.14 -- ROM; outdated and useless library

[Xavier Guimard]

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi all,

libv8-3.14 is an outdated library with many security issue [1]. It had
one reverse dependency which is ROM-RM also (#934243, done).

Then I think it should be removed from Debian.

Cheers,
Xavier

[1]: 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no=libv8-3.14

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#934732: RM: jscommunicator -- ROM; Orphaned upstream

[Xavier Guimard]

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi all,

jscommunicator has been removed from testing 3 years ago. 26 issues are
opened upstream [1], but there is no changes for 4 years. jscommunicator
has no reverse dependencies.

That's why I think it should be removed from Debian.

Cheers,
Xavier

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-file-loader_3.0.1-1~bpo10+1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

node-file-loader_3.0.1-1~bpo10+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to 
localhost
along with the files:
  node-file-loader_3.0.1-1~bpo10+1.dsc
  node-file-loader_3.0.1.orig.tar.gz
  node-file-loader_3.0.1-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
  node-file-loader_3.0.1-1~bpo10+1_all.deb
  node-file-loader_3.0.1-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:21:38 +
Source: node-raw-loader
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers 

Changed-By: Pirate Praveen 
Changes:
 node-raw-loader (1.0.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * Reupload to unstable
Checksums-Sha1:
 067564bb7554ae8f3fa0d5459cbacc5cbd8a63f8 2124 node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2.dsc
 032e70d17ed2569efd800ddd8035b7d32a562723 2560 
node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 debd40c370e1d12dce8fc53666aeb2bb403a23a8 6061 
node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 60fa8ebec7b8f41cfece99522836fc6fb61fa3927eb7b7090c740eb6a81e55a5 2124 
node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2.dsc
 ff92c50e1492778a10fddc3d5dd3af3004f46ecfc6763eec58b9d593ec381995 2560 
node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 0ac966e440197af102fe57f4fd8880af6934ebb1d2f71b446ea777b87b5b6014 6061 
node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 2eb197c052f82e0ea895e7f433cebc58 2124 javascript optional 
node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2.dsc
 ecfaec40e84a19837d9b0069bf9a7e68 2560 javascript optional 
node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 dd375a2c21d5e3ea8c3ba9d8c0b7e414 6061 javascript optional 
node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=sb0j
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-worker-loader_2.0.0-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:node-worker-loader is NEW.
binary:node-worker-loader is NEW.
source:node-worker-loader is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-cache-loader_2.0.1-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:node-cache-loader is NEW.
binary:node-cache-loader is NEW.
source:node-cache-loader is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-url-loader_1.1.2-1~bpo10+1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:node-url-loader is NEW.
binary:node-url-loader is NEW.
source:node-url-loader is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-file-loader_3.0.1-1~bpo10+1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:node-file-loader is NEW.
binary:node-file-loader is NEW.
source:node-file-loader is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2.dsc
  node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2.debian.tar.xz
  node-raw-loader_1.0.0-2_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] De-embedding a component

[Paolo Greppi]

On 14/08/19 14:57, Xavier wrote:
> Le 14/08/2019 à 14:55, Paolo Greppi a écrit :
>> The https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/GroupSourcesTutorial page is great
>> but does not cover the reverse step, when you want to de-embed a component.
>>
>> This is useful if upstream drops that dependency or if it gets separately
>> packaged in Debian.
>>
>> I have done that manually for node-yarnpkg/strict-uri-encode here:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yarnpkg/commit/9a7ff6867e
>>
>> Please someone review my approach before I upload, and maybe document it in
>> the wiki page above.
>> One thing I am not sure about is that strict-uri-encode tarball is still
>> present in pristine-tar branch ...
>>
>> Paolo
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I can easily build a "del-node-component"

This operation happens seldom, maybe a documented manual procedure is also OK

Paolo


-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] pkg-js-tools 0.9.4 MIGRATED to testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the pkg-js-tools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.8.13
  Current version:  0.9.4

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-exports-loader_0.7.0-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

node-exports-loader_0.7.0-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to 
localhost
along with the files:
  node-exports-loader_0.7.0-2~bpo10+1.dsc
  node-exports-loader_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz
  node-exports-loader_0.7.0-2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
  node-exports-loader_0.7.0-2~bpo10+1_all.deb
  node-exports-loader_0.7.0-2~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-exports-loader_0.7.0-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:node-exports-loader is NEW.
binary:node-exports-loader is NEW.
source:node-exports-loader is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-worker-loader_2.0.0-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

node-worker-loader_2.0.0-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to 
localhost
along with the files:
  node-worker-loader_2.0.0-2~bpo10+1.dsc
  node-worker-loader_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz
  node-worker-loader_2.0.0-2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
  node-worker-loader_2.0.0-2~bpo10+1_all.deb
  node-worker-loader_2.0.0-2~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-url-loader_1.1.2-1~bpo10+1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

node-url-loader_1.1.2-1~bpo10+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  node-url-loader_1.1.2-1~bpo10+1.dsc
  node-url-loader_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz
  node-url-loader_1.1.2-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
  node-url-loader_1.1.2-1~bpo10+1_all.deb
  node-url-loader_1.1.2-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Remove unmaintained package

[Xavier]

Le 14/08/2019 à 07:37, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 09/08/2019 à 07:22, Xavier a écrit :
>> Le 08/08/2019 à 18:25, Xavier a écrit :
>>> Le 08/08/2019 à 09:31, Xavier a écrit :
 Le 08/08/2019 à 08:09, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 08/08/2019 à 07:24, Xavier a écrit :
>> Le 08/08/2019 à 07:11, Xavier a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> looking at UDD, we have a some packages that were not in testing for a
>>> long time and could be considered as orphaned.
>>> If nobody disagree, I'll ask their removal:
>>
>> Update:
>
>>>
>> New update:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm going to ask removal of:

ROM-RM done:
   PACKAGETIME IN QUEUE RDEPS
 * node-yawl1472 days, no dependencies
 * jscommunicator   1406 days, no dependencies
 * libv8-3.14939 days, ROM-RM: uwsgi-plugin-v8

Seems usable and maintained upstream
   PACKAGETIME IN QUEUE RDEPS
 * html2canvas   969 days, no dependencies
 * validator.js  932 days, no dependencies

Updated:
 * node-stream-to-observable (missing little dependency added as
  component)
 * node-postcss-load-options
 * node-postcss-load-plugins
 * node-postcss-load-config
 * node-cache-loader
 * node-cosmiconfig
 * node-worker-loader

Care list:
   PACKAGETIME IN QUEUE
 * node-carto   2103 days, needed by openstreetmap-carto
 * pdf.js   1135 days, buggy, needed by GitLab
 * node-jsdom   1016 days
 * node-xterm785 days
 * node-shell-quote  714 days, => browserify
 * node-diffie-hellman   586 days, => browserify
 * node-katex603 days
 * node-react282 days
 * node-prismjs  260 days

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-cache-loader_2.0.1-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

node-cache-loader_2.0.1-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to 
localhost
along with the files:
  node-cache-loader_2.0.1-2~bpo10+1.dsc
  node-cache-loader_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
  node-cache-loader_2.0.1-2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
  node-cache-loader_2.0.1-2~bpo10+1_all.deb
  node-cache-loader_2.0.1-2~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-imports-loader_0.8.0-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

node-imports-loader_0.8.0-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to 
localhost
along with the files:
  node-imports-loader_0.8.0-2~bpo10+1.dsc
  node-imports-loader_0.8.0.orig.tar.gz
  node-imports-loader_0.8.0-2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
  node-imports-loader_0.8.0-2~bpo10+1_all.deb
  node-imports-loader_0.8.0-2~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] yui3 problems

[Xavier]

Hi all,

yui3 package has many problems:
 - Debian problems:
   * RC/DFSG bug
   * never updated since old-old-stable (except a Security Team change)
   * not released in stable, neither old-stable
   * debian/watch points to a site now redirected to a GitHub repo that
 builds a "yui" library [1]
 - Consistency problems:
   * "yui" npmjs package points to [1]
   * "yui" npm module is "YUI 3: The Yahoo User Interface Library"
   * our packages are named libjs*yui3*
   * "yui3" npmjs package points to [2] with a very different content
 than our
   * [2] is a fork of [3]
   * [1] seems unmaintained for 5 years
   * [2] seems unmaintained for 8 years
   * [3] seems unmaintained for 7 years

yui3 is a reverse dependency of loggerhead:
 * maintained by Bazaar Team
 * not in stable, neither in testing (blocked by yui3 of course)

loggerhead has no reverse dependencies

So my question are:
 * Does Bazaar Team wanted to maintain loggerhead in Debian?
   => if no, please ROM-RM to permits our ROM-RM of yui3
   => if yes, does Bazaar Team want to maintain yui3 by itself?
  * if yes, please go ahead
  * if no:
- which repo is the good dependency of loggerhead
- does JS Team want to clean and maintain this?
  (yadd advice is "**no**")

Cheers,
Xavier

[1]: https://github.com/yui/yui3
[2]: https://github.com/davglass/nodejs-yui3
[3]: https://github.com/yui/nodejs-yui3

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-imports-loader_0.8.0-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:node-imports-loader is NEW.
binary:node-imports-loader is NEW.
source:node-imports-loader is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-neo-async_2.6.1-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

node-neo-async_2.6.1-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  node-neo-async_2.6.1-2~bpo10+1.dsc
  node-neo-async_2.6.1.orig.tar.gz
  node-neo-async_2.6.1-2~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
  node-neo-async_2.6.1-2~bpo10+1_all.deb
  node-neo-async_2.6.1-2~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-style-loader_0.23.1-1_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

node-style-loader_0.23.1-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  node-style-loader_0.23.1-1.dsc
  node-style-loader_0.23.1.orig.tar.gz
  node-style-loader_0.23.1-1.debian.tar.xz
  node-style-loader_0.23.1-1_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] De-embedding a component

[Paolo Greppi]

The https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/GroupSourcesTutorial page is great
but does not cover the reverse step, when you want to de-embed a component.

This is useful if upstream drops that dependency or if it gets separately
packaged in Debian.

I have done that manually for node-yarnpkg/strict-uri-encode here:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yarnpkg/commit/9a7ff6867e

Please someone review my approach before I upload, and maybe document it in
the wiki page above.
One thing I am not sure about is that strict-uri-encode tarball is still
present in pristine-tar branch ...

Paolo

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] De-embedding a component

[Xavier]

Le 14/08/2019 à 14:55, Paolo Greppi a écrit :
> The https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/GroupSourcesTutorial page is great
> but does not cover the reverse step, when you want to de-embed a component.
> 
> This is useful if upstream drops that dependency or if it gets separately
> packaged in Debian.
> 
> I have done that manually for node-yarnpkg/strict-uri-encode here:
> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yarnpkg/commit/9a7ff6867e
> 
> Please someone review my approach before I upload, and maybe document it in
> the wiki page above.
> One thing I am not sure about is that strict-uri-encode tarball is still
> present in pristine-tar branch ...
> 
> Paolo

Hi,

I can easily build a "del-node-component"


-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-neo-async_2.6.1-2~bpo10+1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:node-neo-async is NEW.
binary:node-neo-async is NEW.
source:node-neo-async is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-style-loader_0.23.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:53:55 +
Source: node-style-loader
Architecture: source
Version: 0.23.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers 

Changed-By: Pirate Praveen 
Changes:
 node-style-loader (0.23.1-1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
 .
   [ Xavier Guimard ]
   * Add upstream/metadata
 .
   [ Daniel Ring ]
   * Update d/copyright URL format
 .
   [ Pirate Praveen ]
   * New upstream version 0.23.1
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.4.0 (no changes needed)
   * Drop unnecessary build dependency on dh-buildinfo
   * Switch to pkg-js-tools auto install
Checksums-Sha1:
 2c1c3a2947142698df98b2d57339a1787b39e6c3 2146 node-style-loader_0.23.1-1.dsc
 3b44066aaa87fa4e97d32153c5e1c97bdabf18cc 67010 
node-style-loader_0.23.1.orig.tar.gz
 0afda5d42eefc9c019f8733f4654da3f13f97cea 2332 
node-style-loader_0.23.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 db811a3872f3bcb4fd308575de65768a38f6c8f5 6092 
node-style-loader_0.23.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 21e45da3f47df49f03006d1b11902ab0180bf36b014e85942e6ead3f2b1d7212 2146 
node-style-loader_0.23.1-1.dsc
 7cef8710804d435a14e1aa51b934c9666d6d08abf65dfd0fdfaff5e52c8a7bc2 67010 
node-style-loader_0.23.1.orig.tar.gz
 c36ad3b019112ef64601a957fac46bc31a7c5f1486b41cf170a438a03c44f79a 2332 
node-style-loader_0.23.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 34a9cd4a77d41917bae46152e0c331d60ad44de107b75b4f41650ca1c8984a39 6092 
node-style-loader_0.23.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 d3d07a13b37473b9dafc5bd9be1809d3 2146 javascript optional 
node-style-loader_0.23.1-1.dsc
 66f7efe2e8fabe0ade7ba985f97b105f 67010 javascript optional 
node-style-loader_0.23.1.orig.tar.gz
 bbc32981a8a7a0da7c2e2b599b07d5d2 2332 javascript optional 
node-style-loader_0.23.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 83b57d3c6ed4246f3eb47d8c76056185 6092 javascript optional 
node-style-loader_0.23.1-1_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=VFSk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Suggestions on ruby-task-list and node-deckar01-task-list

[Pirate Praveen]

Hi ruby and js teams,

task_list project [1] provides both ruby and nodejs code from the same 
repo. Currently only ruby-task-list binary package is created. I added 
a new binary package node-deckar01-task-list for the nodejs code, but 
it was rejected by ftp masters [2].


They think we should not add a new binary package for this case and 
instead should use a Provides field and a single binary package. This 
means installing node-deckar01-task-list will install ruby with it and 
ruby-task-list will install nodejs with it. Other option is to remove 
ruby dependency from ruby-task-list (but there are more dependencies 
than just ruby) and not add nodejs dependency. The rationale ftp 
masters give is to reduce number of binary node packages and hence 
metadata per packages.


In general we have started aggressively embedding smaller nodejs 
modules already as per ftp master suggestion, but in my opinion this is 
going too far on their mandate.


I don't agree with their decision, but the only option I have to 
challenege it is a GR. I'd like to hear from the rest of the team what 
you think about the situation. Do you agree with ftp masters? If you 
don't agree, would you support a GR to reverse this policy?


Thanks
Praveen

[1] 
[2] 

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Suggestions on ruby-task-list and node-deckar01-task-list

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Quoting Pirate Praveen (2019-08-14 19:08:47)
> Hi ruby and js teams,
> 
> task_list project [1] provides both ruby and nodejs code from the same 
> repo. Currently only ruby-task-list binary package is created. I added 
> a new binary package node-deckar01-task-list for the nodejs code, but 
> it was rejected by ftp masters [2].

Did you quote ftpmaster in full in that referenced post written by you?


> They think we should not add a new binary package for this case and 
> instead should use a Provides field and a single binary package.

Do they?  In what you reference above I only see Ftpmaster saying "We've 
talked about this." which can frankly mean a lot of different things.


> I don't agree with their decision, but the only option I have to 
> challenege it is a GR.

You mean you have already tried the route of going to the technical 
committee, and asking for the opinion of the DPL?  Or am I missing 
something making those options a no-go?

Whichever options available, I think it would be helpful with the 
opinions of stakeholders more clearly laid out - i.e. more than quoting 
ftpmasters for saying "We've talked about this." and you taking 
responsibility for explaining what that's supposed to mean.


Thanks for your work on this,

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel