Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-pbkdf2/s390x autopkgtest failure

2022-02-03 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Yadd,

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:14 PM Yadd  wrote:
> Should be fixed in version 3.1.1-2

Thank you for the work! \o/

However, it's still failing on s390x; see:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/s390x/n/node-pbkdf2/20220120_013605_914b3@/log.gz

If you give me a patch to fix this, I can run it here and verify that
it's fixed.


- u

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-pbkdf2/s390x autopkgtest failure

2022-02-03 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Yadd,

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:41 PM Yadd  wrote:
> Use thing.BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: if 1 => 'WORD', if 2 => 'DWORD', if 4 => no 
> changes

Aah, not sure if I still fully understand the underlying changes that
are in question. When the computer's repaired and back to functioning
properly, let me know and we can then work and test this out.


- u

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] doubt with autopkgtest for javascript packages

2020-11-08 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Sudip,

On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Sudip Mukherjee
 wrote:
> While going through packages to find autopkgtests which are
> superficial I noticed that some of of the javascript packages are
> doing just:
> nodejs -e "require('foo.js');"
>
> After reading the documentation at [1], it seems that it will just
> load the object in cache so that the exported properties and methods
> of the object can be used in the code.
> Can you please confirm if my understanding is correct and the tests
> are indeed superficial in nature as it is just loading the object and
> not actually using any of the exported methods or properties.

You're indeed correct and these are just superficial test which just
helps in the preliminary check that things are in order (syntax wise
and that the module can be used and loaded).
From what I remember, most of these (at least from a bunch of those
that I have touched) are already marked as superficial. In case we can
get a list of tests that aren't yet superficial, fixing them should be
trivial! :)

Thanks for all your work on this! \o/


- u

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Help with fixing jekyll (wrt src:node-webpack)

2020-03-14 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Praveen,

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 4:54 PM Pirate Praveen  wrote:
> I have patched webpack to use uglifyjs-webpack-plugin till
> terser-webpack-plugin is availabel in the archive. I confirmed jekyll
> is building fine, I'll upload it soon.

Thank you very much for your quick fix!
Very much appreciated! \o/


Best,
Utkarsh

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Help with fixing jekyll (wrt src:node-webpack)

2020-03-13 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi there,

Currently, Jekyll doesn't build. Here's why:
This commit[1] introduced using webpack. However this command:

```
cd debian/node_modules/livereload-js; webpack --entry ./lib/startup.js \
--output
../../../lib/jekyll/commands/serve/livereload_assets/livereload.js; cd
-
```

fails to run with the following error:

```
/usr/share/nodejs/webpack/node_modules/webpack-cli/bin/cli.js:281
throw err;
^

Error: Cannot find module 'terser-webpack-plugin'
at Function.Module._resolveFilename (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:636:15)
at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:562:25)
at Module.require (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:692:17)
at require 
(/usr/share/nodejs/webpack/node_modules/v8-compile-cache/v8-compile-cache.js:161:20)
at Object.apply
(/usr/share/nodejs/webpack/lib/WebpackOptionsDefaulter.js:302:27)
at WebpackOptionsApply.process
(/usr/share/nodejs/webpack/lib/WebpackOptionsApply.js:467:16)
at webpack (/usr/share/nodejs/webpack/lib/webpack.js:53:48)
at processOptions
(/usr/share/nodejs/webpack/node_modules/webpack-cli/bin/cli.js:272:16)
at yargs.parse
(/usr/share/nodejs/webpack/node_modules/webpack-cli/bin/cli.js:364:3)
at Object.parse (/usr/share/nodejs/yargs/yargs.js:611:18)
at /usr/share/nodejs/webpack/node_modules/webpack-cli/bin/cli.js:49:8
at Object.
(/usr/share/nodejs/webpack/node_modules/webpack-cli/bin/cli.js:366:3)
at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:778:30)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:789:10)
at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:653:32)
at tryModuleLoad (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:593:12)
at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:585:3)
at Module.require (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:692:17)
at require (internal/modules/cjs/helpers.js:25:18)
at Object. (/usr/share/nodejs/webpack/bin/webpack.js:156:2)
at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:778:30)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:789:10)
at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:653:32)
at tryModuleLoad (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:593:12)
at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:585:3)
at Function.Module.runMain (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:831:12)
at startup (internal/bootstrap/node.js:283:19)
at bootstrapNodeJSCore (internal/bootstrap/node.js:623:3)
```

This maps to src:node-webpack. Whilst package.json (of node-webpack)
says to have a dependency on terser-webpack-plugin, however, it isn't
packaged and nor embedded. In fact, there's no mention of
terser-webpack-plugin at all.
This creates a problem with Jekyll (as shown above). I am not sure
what's the best way forward now? Is to embed terser-webpack-plugin
(with it's other dependencies packaged or embedded)? Or to embed
livereload-js into jekyll? Or what?

In any case, this is a bug with src:node-webpack which would be good
to have fixed.


Best,
Utkarsh
---
[1]: 
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/jekyll/-/commit/737def7c142fa252183bef6fa421dbb144f45351

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Sick and tired of hundreds of notifications

2020-02-21 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi,

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 12:43 AM Utkarsh Gupta
 wrote:
> This is done via #946979.

Could someone support the request here, please?

Also, I, hereby, unsubscribe from pkg-javascript-de...@alioth-l.d.net.
I hope the migration to debian-js@l.d.o happens soon.

Once done, I'd appreciate if someone would reply here, CCing me.


Best,
Utkarsh

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Request to (re)join JS team

2019-12-30 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
On 31/12/19 3:07 am, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I'd like to migrate my current membership of the Ruby team to use my new
  ~
Err, I meant the JavaScript team :)
Sorry for that; in midst of requesting to a couple of teams :)

> Salsa login, i.e., utkarsh \o/
> (previously utkarsh2102-guest)
> 
> Many thanks for helping, guiding and sponsoring all my uploads! :D
> 
> P.S. I'd be really happy if I could get the "owner" ACL so that I can
> add new contributors to the team myself in future.


Best,
Utkarsh



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Request to (re)join JS team

2019-12-30 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hello everyone,

I'd like to migrate my current membership of the Ruby team to use my new
Salsa login, i.e., utkarsh \o/
(previously utkarsh2102-guest)

Many thanks for helping, guiding and sponsoring all my uploads! :D

P.S. I'd be really happy if I could get the "owner" ACL so that I can
add new contributors to the team myself in future.


Best,
Utkarsh



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] getting nodejs 12 in debian sid

2019-12-27 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi there,

On 13/12/19 12:20 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 2019, ഡിസംബർ 13 7:50:50 AM IST, "shirish शिरीष"  
> wrote:
>> Any update as to when we get nodejs starting to make noises in
>> unstable/sid ?
> It is stalled. nodejs 12, needs acorn 6, acorn 6 transition needs rollup 1.10 
> and webpack 4.30. Webpack 4.30 needs webassemblyjs which is in NEW for 1 
> month. So only after ftp masters clear node-webassemblyjs from NEW, we can 
> upload nodejs 12 to unstable. Also note that there may be other blockers for 
> nodejs 12 in addition to acorn 6.

node-webassemblyjs is now accepted in experimental.
Perhaps we can initiate the transitions? :D


Best,
Utkarsh




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#947118: node-on-headers: autopkgtest started failing and then times out

2019-12-21 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hiya,

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 3:51 PM Paul Gevers  wrote:

> Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, I noticed that without
> any change from your side it started failing, and while doing so also
> doesn't finish, hence timing out on ci.debian.net. Obviously this isn't
> your fault, but please investigate, such that you can assign this bug to
> the right package. Please consider improving the test suite to not hang
> in case of failure. This is not the only node package that has this,
> e.g. check https://ci.debian.net/status/slow/ to see more. Don't
> hesitate to ask for help from the Debian CI team (in X-Debbugs-CC) if
> you need help solving this issue.
>

I've just added a --timeout 1, which should be enough to fix this (and
switched the package to use pkg-js-tools).

Could someone confirm if that indeed works?


Best,
Utkarsh

>
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Sick and tired of hundreds of notifications

2019-12-18 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hiya,

On 17/12/19 10:28 am, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Since no one objected it, I think you can go ahead and request debian-js at 
> lists.debian.org 

This is done via #946979.
Thanks all :)


Best,
Utkarsh




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Sick and tired of hundreds of notifications

2019-12-16 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi,

On 20/10/19 9:03 am, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019, 13:05 Pirate Praveen  wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 19:24, Utkarsh Gupta 
>> wrote:
>>
>>  I am not sure what a better workaround than shifting normal
>> discussions to debian-js@l.d.o would be? Any ideas?
>>
>>
>> Shfting discussions to another mailing list makes sense. go team did that
>> already.
> Whilst I'm not sure how to go about it, can someone initiate the migration,
> if we have a mutual consent on this?

Can we please do something about this yet?


Best,
Utkarsh




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Fwd:?==?utf-8?q? Re: Debian Janitor and us

2019-12-16 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hiya,

On 16/12/19 2:06 pm, Xavier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> You probably saw that I merged some patches provided by Debian-Janitor bot 
> (it fix some lintian warnings automatically). If you agree, we could allow it 
> to directly commit in our repositories. Some other teams (see below) already 
> gave some maintainer rights to it.

Yes, please.
It's doing a good job, indeed!

Given that it's already implemented in the Perl team (& seems to be
working just fine), it'd be a lovely idea to do this here as well.


Best,
Utkarsh




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Please subscribe with the email address you use to post

2019-10-19 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 02:19 Jonas Smedegaard  wrote:

> Hi Shirish and everyone else here,
>
> Please subscribe to the mailinglist with the email address that you
> actively use to post here.
>

I'd much appreciate if we shift the discussions to debian-js@l.d.o instead
of here. Reasons in another thread on the list.

That way you avoid delays for manually screening that your email is not
> spam.  And you avoid others doing that manual screening :-)
>

And by that way (migrating to somewhere sane), we all can avoid gazillions
of notifications and "manual screening" as well.


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Sick and tired of hundreds of notifications

2019-10-19 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hello,

On Sat, Oct 19, 2019, 13:05 Pirate Praveen  wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 19:24, Utkarsh Gupta 
> wrote:
>
>  I am not sure what a better workaround than shifting normal
> discussions to debian-js@l.d.o would be? Any ideas?
>
>
> Shfting discussions to another mailing list makes sense. go team did that
> already.
>

Whilst I'm not sure how to go about it, can someone initiate the migration,
if we have a mutual consent on this?


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Sick and tired of hundreds of notifications

2019-10-18 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

It's been quite a while since I've been trying to *not* write this, but
realizing this would never end, so here..

Can we *please* shift to a sane mailing list (maybe something like
debian-js@l.d.o?) where people can discuss things normally?
Seeing hundreds of "Processing of _source/only.changes",
"_source/only.changes ACCEPTED into unstable", and " MIGRATED to
testing" rather makes me sick. And due to all such notifications, it
kinda gets hard to track all the actual, sane emails.
Also, it's kinda annoying to not being able to map mails/threads even in
the archive. It takes extra (and quite unnecessary) effort to do so.

I am not sure what a better workaround than shifting normal discussions
to debian-js@l.d.o would be? Any ideas?


Best,
Utkarsh




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Babel

2019-08-31 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On 15/08/19 12:07 pm, Xavier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "gulp build-babel-standalone" command succeeds here (7.5.5) with the
> following package:
>
> PACKAGE   : DEB-VERSION => GOOD-VERSION
>   --- upgraded ---
> babel-loader  : 7.1.5 => 8.0.6
> base64-js : 1.3.0 => 1.3.1
> chalk : 2.3.0 => 2.4.2
> color-convert : 1.9.0 => 1.9.3
> globals   : 11.1.0 => 11.12.0
> ieee754   : 1.1.12 => 1.1.13
> js-tokens : 2.0.0 => 4.0.0

Updated. Pushed.
RFS.


Best,
Utkarsh




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Babel

2019-08-29 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On 15/08/19 12:07 pm, Xavier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "gulp build-babel-standalone" command succeeds here (7.5.5) with the
> following package:
>
> PACKAGE   : DEB-VERSION => GOOD-VERSION
>   --- upgraded ---
> babel-loader  : 7.1.5 => 8.0.6
> base64-js : 1.3.0 => 1.3.1
> chalk : 2.3.0 => 2.4.2
> color-convert : 1.9.0 => 1.9.3
> globals   : 11.1.0 => 11.12.0

Updated. Pushed.
RFS.


Best,
Utkarsh




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Babel

2019-08-29 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On 15/08/19 12:07 pm, Xavier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "gulp build-babel-standalone" command succeeds here (7.5.5) with the
> following package:
>
> PACKAGE   : DEB-VERSION => GOOD-VERSION
>   --- upgraded ---
> babel-loader  : 7.1.5 => 8.0.6
> base64-js : 1.3.0 => 1.3.1
> chalk : 2.3.0 => 2.4.2
> color-convert : 1.9.0 => 1.9.3
> globals   : 11.1.0 => 11.12.0
> ieee754   : 1.1.12 => 1.1.13
> js-tokens : 2.0.0 => 4.0.0
> node-libs-browser : 2.2.0 => 2.2.1
> regenerator-transform : 0.9.8 => 0.14.1

Updated. Pushed.
RFS.


Best,
Utkarsh





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Babel

2019-08-28 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On 15/08/19 12:07 pm, Xavier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "gulp build-babel-standalone" command succeeds here (7.5.5) with the
> following package:
>
> PACKAGE   : DEB-VERSION => GOOD-VERSION
>   --- upgraded ---
> babel-loader  : 7.1.5 => 8.0.6
> base64-js : 1.3.0 => 1.3.1
> chalk : 2.3.0 => 2.4.2
> color-convert : 1.9.0 => 1.9.3
> globals   : 11.1.0 => 11.12.0
> ieee754   : 1.1.12 => 1.1.13
> js-tokens : 2.0.0 => 4.0.0
> node-libs-browser : 2.2.0 => 2.2.1
> regenerator-transform : 0.9.8 => 0.14.1
> regexpu-core  : 4.5.4 => 4.5.5
> resolve   : 1.5.0 => 1.12.0
> semver: 5.5.1 => 5.7.1
> supports-color: 4.4.0 => 5.5.0
> to-fast-properties: 1.0.2 => 2.0.0

Updated. Pushed.
RFS (or I can upload it with DM access).

>   --- downgraded -
> isarray   : 2.0.4 => 1.0.0
> source-map: 0.6.1 => 0.5.7
> tapable   : 1.0.0 => 0.2.9
> webpack   : 4.7.0 => 3.12.0
>
> NB: this is an automatic script, results may be false or incomplete


Best,
Utkarsh




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Babel

2019-08-27 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On 28/08/19 9:41 am, Xavier wrote:
> Le 28/08/2019 à 03:59, Utkarsh Gupta a écrit :
>> Hey,
>>
>> On 15/08/19 12:07 pm, Xavier wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> "gulp build-babel-standalone" command succeeds here (7.5.5) with the
>>> following package:
>>>
>>> PACKAGE   : DEB-VERSION => GOOD-VERSION
>>>   --- upgraded ---
>>> babel-loader  : 7.1.5 => 8.0.6
>>> base64-js : 1.3.0 => 1.3.1
>>> chalk : 2.3.0 => 2.4.2
>>> color-convert : 1.9.0 => 1.9.3
>>> globals   : 11.1.0 => 11.12.0
>>> ieee754   : 1.1.12 => 1.1.13
>>> js-tokens : 2.0.0 => 4.0.0
>>> node-libs-browser : 2.2.0 => 2.2.1
>>> regenerator-transform : 0.9.8 => 0.14.1
>>> regexpu-core  : 4.5.4 => 4.5.5
>>> resolve   : 1.5.0 => 1.12.0
>>> semver: 5.5.1 => 5.7.1
>>> supports-color: 4.4.0 => 5.5.0
>> The version in the archive was 6.1.0 which is needed for ava.
>> In any case, I created a "downgrade" branch from the master and
>> downgraded the version to 5.5.0.
>> Hope this resolves the problem here :)
>> Changes are pushed, shall upload myself by tonight if no one has any
>> problem with it.
> No, 6.1.0 was published, patch "ava" to use 6.1.0

In any case, we had to downgrade it to 5.5.0 for babel, no?
Since 6.1.0 is already in the archive.


Best,
Utkarsh




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Babel

2019-08-27 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On 15/08/19 12:07 pm, Xavier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "gulp build-babel-standalone" command succeeds here (7.5.5) with the
> following package:
>
> PACKAGE   : DEB-VERSION => GOOD-VERSION
>   --- upgraded ---
> babel-loader  : 7.1.5 => 8.0.6
> base64-js : 1.3.0 => 1.3.1
> chalk : 2.3.0 => 2.4.2
> color-convert : 1.9.0 => 1.9.3
> globals   : 11.1.0 => 11.12.0
> ieee754   : 1.1.12 => 1.1.13
> js-tokens : 2.0.0 => 4.0.0
> node-libs-browser : 2.2.0 => 2.2.1
> regenerator-transform : 0.9.8 => 0.14.1
> regexpu-core  : 4.5.4 => 4.5.5
> resolve   : 1.5.0 => 1.12.0
> semver: 5.5.1 => 5.7.1
> supports-color: 4.4.0 => 5.5.0

The version in the archive was 6.1.0 which is needed for ava.
In any case, I created a "downgrade" branch from the master and
downgraded the version to 5.5.0.
Hope this resolves the problem here :)
Changes are pushed, shall upload myself by tonight if no one has any
problem with it.

> to-fast-properties: 1.0.2 => 2.0.0
>   --- downgraded -
> isarray   : 2.0.4 => 1.0.0
> source-map: 0.6.1 => 0.5.7
> tapable   : 1.0.0 => 0.2.9
> webpack   : 4.7.0 => 3.12.0
>
> NB: this is an automatic script, results may be false or incomplete


Best,
Utkarsh




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Testing migrations

2019-08-23 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On Fri 23 Aug, 2019, 12:00 Pirate Praveen,  wrote:

>
>
> On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 21 2:29:46 AM IST, Utkarsh Gupta <
> guptautkarsh2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >I can't seem to build. There are so many problems. Changed binaries,
> >then
> >local changes.
> >Not sure what's happening :P
>
> I have fixed node-d3 locally, will push soon.
>
> I had to add /usr/share/nodejs to node-resolve plugin in rollup.config.js,
> update debian/links and also create links during build for pkg-js-tools
> require test.
>

Geez.
As far as I remember, some binary contents changed after each build.
Perhaps we need to add them to d/source/include-binaries?


Best,
Utkarsh

>
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Testing migrations

2019-08-20 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:07 PM Xavier  wrote:

> Le 20/08/2019 à 17:34, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> >
> >
> > On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 20 7:26:24 PM IST, Xavier  wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> please take a look at:
> >>
> >> * node-d3-request[1]: seems built for browser instead of node [1]:
> >>   "ReferenceError: window is not defined"
>
> @praveen: Utkarsh switched target from "web" to "node", is it OK for you?
>

Thanks for uploading :D


> >> * node-d3[2]: bad transpilation:
> >>  "(function (exports, require, module, __filename, __dirname) { export
> >>   ^^
> >>SyntaxError: Unexpected token export"
> >
> > I think we may have to use rollup-plugin-buble manually since we have an
> older rollup.
>

I can't seem to build. There are so many problems. Changed binaries, then
local changes.
Not sure what's happening :P
On the side note, is rollup worth updating?


> >> * node-markdown-it-html5-embed[3]: missing dependency
> >>   "Error: Cannot find module 'mimoza'"
>
> Fixed
>

Perfecto, thanks! :D

>> * node-xmpp[4]: node-stringprep breaks node-xmpp autopkgtest
>

I guess we should ping Jeremy on the same bug?
Or if you see this Jeremy, could you update the status on this?


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#934915: node-es6-promise doesn't work anymore

2019-08-19 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 8:27 PM Julien Puydt 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Le 19/08/2019 à 15:23, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> > On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 19 6:26:14 PM IST, Julien Puydt <
> julien.pu...@laposte.net> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Le 16/08/2019 à 18:49, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> >>> Try removing target 'web' option. (On phone now).
> >>
> >> I removed that line: no better.
> >
> > I think we will have to add target: 'node'
>
> Done : it fixes the problem. I pushed a commit.
>

I was about to push. Was getting an error, turns out you pushed it before I
could :)

>> And since then, a commit even broke the build ; I complained to the
> >> author, but don't try anything before it's cleaned up...
> >
> > I think he is trying to integrate pkg-js-tools and the breakage was
> caused by debhelper. I think its fixed now.
>
> Indeed, the new debhelper makes it run, but lintian is unhappy:
>
> W: node-es6-promise source: pkg-js-autopkgtest-test-is-missing
> W: node-es6-promise source: pkg-js-tools-test-is-missing
>
> so I guess the move isn't complete yet.
>

package.json says ember is needed to run the tests, which is not yet
packaged in Debian, I guess.
So this warning is fine. I mean, we could live with it for a while, I guess?
Also, autopkgtest *doesn't* fail. It passes the "require" test and skips
the other one, which is kinda obvious.

Also, I am pushing changes to my namespace.
See here: https://salsa.debian.org/utkarsh2102-guest/node-es6-promise
Let me know if you want to integrate them in the main package.


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Looking for help in updating npm to new usptream version

2019-08-17 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On 17/08/19 8:01 pm, Manas Kashyap wrote:
> i have successfully applied the npm-clean-module part in debian/rules
> file , and for node-gyp i see it as a dependency , so do i need to
> remove it from dependency ? and then why do i need to update copyright ? 
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 7:46 PM Manas Kashyap
> mailto:manaskashyapt...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Remove node-gyp from dependency ?
>
Sorry for being picky, but could you *not* top-post every mail on the other?
Follow mailing list guidelines[1] as much as you can :)


Best,
Utkarsh
---
[1]:
http://www.shakthimaan.com/downloads/glv/presentations/mailing-list-etiquette.pdf




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Basic pkg-js-tools example

2019-08-10 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 4:49 PM Xavier  wrote:

> 
> Easy to replace by node-tape with a patch, an example:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-cosmiconfig/blob/master/debian/patches/switch-test-from-ava-to-tape.diff
>

Ah, the same way like before :D
But sometimes it is not that easy to replace with node-tape.
I might as well ignore that there then.

> But now, if there's no directory, lintian gives a warning. Do we ignore
> > those warnings?
>
> It depends. Many package have this warning, try to patch test to use
> tape. Else keep the warning.
>
> Never override this warning
>

Ack, thank you!


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Basic pkg-js-tools example

2019-08-10 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:29 PM Xavier  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> for most of node-* packages, you can simplify packaging like this:
> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-pumpify/commit/416495cd


What if the package requires xo and ava for tests?
In the case, we previously didn't create a directory for tests under
debain/.
But now, if there's no directory, lintian gives a warning. Do we ignore
those warnings?


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Remove unmaintained package

2019-08-07 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:41 AM Xavier  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> looking at UDD, we have a some packages that were not in testing for a
> long time and could be considered as orphaned.
> If no one disagree, I'll ask their removal:
>
>PACKAGETIME IN QUEUE
>  * node-carto   2103 days
>  * node-yawl1472 days
>  * pdf.js   1135 days, buggy


pdf.js is needed by gitlab. I know it's buggy and a lot of things are
needed to be done there :(
But gitlab needs it anyway. So it'd be better if we can work on it and make
it migrate to testing :D


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Tip

2019-08-03 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 7:08 PM Xavier  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> when you need to link a node library into your package during build
> (debian/rules), no more use "ln -s /usr/lib/nodejs/npm-name" but
> instead, use:
>
> override_dh_auto_build:
> # ...
> ln -s `nodepath npm-name` node_modules/
>

Just checked, it works well! :D
Saves the "ln -s" effort!

Thank you for the same! :D


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Using GroupedSources for gulp

2019-05-20 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

On 20/05/19 11:28 pm, Xavier wrote:
> Le 20/05/2019 à 19:24, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>> version=4
>>
>> opts=\
>> dversionmangle=s/\+(debian|dfsg|ds|deb)(\.\d+)?$//,\
>> filenamemangle=s/.*\/v?([\d\.-]+)\.tar\.gz/node-gulp-$1.tar.gz/ \
>> https://github.com/gulpjs/gulp/tags .*/archive/v?([\d\.]+).tar.gz group
>>
>> opts="searchmode=plain,pgpmode=none,component=gulp-cli" \
>> https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-cli \
>>
>> https://registry.npmjs.org/gulp-cli/-/gulp-cli-(\d[\d\.]*)@ARCHIVE_EXT@
>> ignore
> Replace "group" by "debian" here. Attached file works fine

Though the attached watch file works when there's no changelog entry,
but it fails to create `node-gulp_4.0.2.orig-gulp-cli.tar.gz` when
there's a changelog entry.

Steps to reproduce:

1. Import the changes and make a changelog entry.
2. Try `uscan --download-current-version`. It fails there :(



Best,
Utkarsh




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-opencv

2019-03-26 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

The recent update fixes the CVE-2019-10061 and thus the bug #925571.
The package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built and was lintian
clean.

The changes can be found at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-opencv

Requesting you to please review and upload the same :)


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-markdown-it-html5-embed

2019-01-16 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:24 AM Xavier  wrote:

> Le 15/01/2019 à 23:57, Utkarsh Gupta a écrit :
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:37 AM Xavier  > <mailto:x.guim...@free.fr>> wrote:
> >
> >     Le 15/01/2019 à 22:06, Utkarsh Gupta a écrit :
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:34 AM Utkarsh Gupta
> > > mailto:guptautkarsh2...@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:guptautkarsh2...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:guptautkarsh2...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The package
> node-markdown-it-html5-embed_1.0.0+ds-1_amd64.changes
> > > was rejected because of the issues in the license block.
> > > And the rejection mail can be found here:
> > >
> >
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2019-January/030605.htm
> > >
> > >
> > > Correction:
> > >
> >
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2019-January/030605.html
> > >
> > > However, I updated the same and the changes would be visible
> > at the
> > > salsa repo which may be found at
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-markdown-it-html5-embed/
> > >
> > > Requesting you to please upload the same.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Utkarsh
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > TODO added in debian/changelog
> >
> >
> > Ah, thank you so much!
> > However, I am facing a little difficulty in adding a test in
> debian/rules.
> > I am able to set the other things right, except that.
> > When I add a minimal test, the build fails and on removal, it builds
> > successfully.
> > Could you please help me a little here, too?
> >
> > Thanks !
>
> Done. Little question, are you sure this module is useful ? It provides
> a plugin for markdown-it which isn't available in unstable.
> That's the reason why I added a minimal test and not the real one (mocha).
>

Thank you so much! :D
I updated and pushed the rest of the changes you suggested.
Could you please review the same?

The module was included by Praveen (prav...@debian.org), so I am sure he
must have something in mind.
I just fixed the error due to which the package was rejected.

So if it is fine by you, could you review the changes and upload the same?


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-markdown-it-html5-embed

2019-01-15 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:37 AM Xavier  wrote:

> Le 15/01/2019 à 22:06, Utkarsh Gupta a écrit :
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:34 AM Utkarsh Gupta
> > mailto:guptautkarsh2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The package node-markdown-it-html5-embed_1.0.0+ds-1_amd64.changes
> > was rejected because of the issues in the license block.
> > And the rejection mail can be found here:
> >
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2019-January/030605.htm
> >
> >
> > Correction:
> >
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2019-January/030605.html
> >
> >
> > However, I updated the same and the changes would be visible at the
> > salsa repo which may be found at
> > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-markdown-it-html5-embed/
> >
> > Requesting you to please upload the same.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Utkarsh
>
> Hello,
>
> TODO added in debian/changelog
>

Ah, thank you so much!
However, I am facing a little difficulty in adding a test in debian/rules.
I am able to set the other things right, except that.
When I add a minimal test, the build fails and on removal, it builds
successfully.
Could you please help me a little here, too?


> Thanks !
>
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-markdown-it-html5-embed

2019-01-15 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:34 AM Utkarsh Gupta 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The package node-markdown-it-html5-embed_1.0.0+ds-1_amd64.changes was
> rejected because of the issues in the license block.
> And the rejection mail can be found here:
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2019-January/030605.htm
>

Correction:
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2019-January/030605.html


> However, I updated the same and the changes would be visible at the salsa
> repo which may be found at
> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-markdown-it-html5-embed/
>
> Requesting you to please upload the same.
>
>
> Best,
> Utkarsh
>
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-markdown-it-html5-embed

2019-01-15 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi,

The package node-markdown-it-html5-embed_1.0.0+ds-1_amd64.changes was
rejected because of the issues in the license block.
And the rejection mail can be found here:
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2019-January/030605.htm

However, I updated the same and the changes would be visible at the salsa
repo which may be found at
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-markdown-it-html5-embed/

Requesting you to please upload the same.


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Request to join Javascript team

2019-01-14 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:38 PM Xavier  wrote:

> Le 14/01/2019 à 10:09, Utkarsh Gupta a écrit :
> > Hey,
> >
> > I am already a part of ruby and go team, and would like to join the
> > Javascript team, as well.
> >
> > My QA profile could be found on
> > https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=guptautkarsh2...@gmail.com
> >
> > I've requested to join the salsa team[2].
> >
> > Requesting you to please grant me the access so I can start updating the
> > packages at the earliest.
> >
> > [2]: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/
>
> Hello,
>
> welcome to this group! Please read:
>  - our policy [1] & [2]
>  - embedding policy [3]
>
> To ask for review, you can add an issue to [4] with tag RFS or RFC.
> Don't hesitate to ask for help if necessary on this list.
>

Thank you so much!


> Cheers,
> Xavier
>
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Policy
> [2] https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs
> [3] https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/GroupSourcesTutorial
> [4] https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/current_itps/boards


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Request to join Javascript team

2019-01-14 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey,

I am already a part of ruby and go team, and would like to join the
Javascript team, as well.

My QA profile could be found on
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=guptautkarsh2...@gmail.com

I've requested to join the salsa team[2].

Requesting you to please grant me the access so I can start updating the
packages at the earliest.

[2]: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/


Best,
Utkarsh
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel