Quoting Pirate Praveen (2019-10-24 15:10:09)
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 16:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Sounds reasonable to introduce psl as new _binary_ package (not
> > embed in _binary_ package node-though-cookie and add "Provides:
> > node-psl" hint): Upstream project has many seemingly
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 16:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Sounds reasonable to introduce psl as new _binary_ package (not embed
in
_binary_ package node-though-cookie and add "Provides: node-psl"
hint):
Upstream project has many seemingly unrelated reverse dependencies
which
are probably not
Quoting Pirate Praveen (2019-10-22 13:12:50)
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:26, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> javascript packages are treated differently from other languages.
> >> ruby packages get cleared in days or maximum weeks.
> >
> > Some JavaScript packages get cleared within hours.
Le mardi 22 octobre 2019 à 10:01 +0200, Xavier a écrit :
> Le Mardi, Octobre 22, 2019 09:10 CEST, Julien Puydt <
> julien.pu...@laposte.net> a écrit:
> > If you want to have ts-node, why not package it properly, with a
> > RFP or
> > ITP?
> >
> > I don't see the point into packaging those
Le Mardi, Octobre 22, 2019 09:10 CEST, Julien Puydt
a écrit:
> If you want to have ts-node, why not package it properly, with a RFP or
> ITP?
>
> I don't see the point into packaging those together...
>
> JP
It was an attempt to avoid waiting 6 or 7 months in the NEW queue with a 50%
chance
