[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#902178: node-turbolinks: Does not work as intended
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 18:10:55 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > I think this is the syntax used by sprokets. We may be able to patch it > to use the regular commonjs require syntax. > I have pushed a patch to salsa. Can you build and test? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#902178: node-turbolinks: Does not work as intended
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 04:43:43 -0700 njos...@riseup.net wrote: > I think the issue is with coffeescript compilation. I tried compiling it > using the coffee command. The index.js produced has no imports at all. > Hence, the output that is finally produced using webpack and uglifyjs is > just the index.js file. The dist file is literally the index.js file > with some webpack cruft added at the top. > > I don't recognize the import syntax in the coffeescript files. Is this a > new require syntax introduced in coffeescript 2.0 ? But why put them in > comments with #= symbols? I hope it isn't a syntax that can only be > compiled by their "blade" gem. I think this is the syntax used by sprokets. We may be able to patch it to use the regular commonjs require syntax. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#902178: node-turbolinks: Does not work as intended
I think the issue is with coffeescript compilation. I tried compiling it using the coffee command. The index.js produced has no imports at all. Hence, the output that is finally produced using webpack and uglifyjs is just the index.js file. The dist file is literally the index.js file with some webpack cruft added at the top. I don't recognize the import syntax in the coffeescript files. Is this a new require syntax introduced in coffeescript 2.0 ? But why put them in comments with #= symbols? I hope it isn't a syntax that can only be compiled by their "blade" gem. -- Regards, Joseph Nuthalapati -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#902178: node-turbolinks: Does not work as intended
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 18:44:53 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > Any ideas? May be we missed some options for webpack. If we cannot emulate the build with webpack, we will have to package blade (written in ruby). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#902178: node-turbolinks: Does not work as intended
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 13:03:24 +0530 Joseph Nuthalapati wrote:> The turbolinks package installed through Debian doesn't seem to have all the > code from upstream. > > The minified Javascript from the Debian package has 1448 characters while the > dist packaged obtained from source has 36927 characters, measured using `wc`. > This might be why the package does nothing when used in the browser. We used webpack because the upstream build system is not packaged. > Please fix the build mechanism of this package. Any ideas? May be we missed some options for webpack. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#902178: node-turbolinks: Does not work as intended
Package: node-turbolinks Version: 5.1.1+dfsg-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, The turbolinks package installed through Debian doesn't seem to have all the code from upstream. The minified Javascript from the Debian package has 1448 characters while the dist packaged obtained from source has 36927 characters, measured using `wc`. This might be why the package does nothing when used in the browser. Please fix the build mechanism of this package. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.16.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_IN.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_IN.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled -- no debconf information -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
