[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#918388: fixed in nodejs 10.15.0~dfsg-8

2019-01-07 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 06/01/2019 13:11, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> [asking -release]
> 
> On 1/6/19 5:31 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> Control: reopen -1
>>
>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2019 10:34:48 + =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsOpbXkgTGFs?=
>>  wrote:
>>>* Suggests npm - because nodejs must not be blocked by it.
>>>  Closes: #918388.
>>
>> I don't think this reasoning is correct. gitlab recommends gitaly with
>> the expectation that gitaly andd gitlab could be on different machines.
>> ruby-rails currently recommends packages not even in the archive
>> currently and it is not marked for auto removals for that.
>>
>> I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
>>
> 
> Hi Release team,
> 
> Can you confirm if an rc bug in a packaged listed in recommends will
> block testing migration of a package? (in this specific case, the fear
> is that rc bug in npm will block nodejs testing migration).

Recommends are not taken into account for testing migration.

Emilio

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#918388: fixed in nodejs 10.15.0~dfsg-8

2019-01-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
[asking -release]

On 1/6/19 5:31 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> 
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2019 10:34:48 + =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsOpbXkgTGFs?=
>  wrote:
>>* Suggests npm - because nodejs must not be blocked by it.
>>  Closes: #918388.
> 
> I don't think this reasoning is correct. gitlab recommends gitaly with
> the expectation that gitaly andd gitlab could be on different machines.
> ruby-rails currently recommends packages not even in the archive
> currently and it is not marked for auto removals for that.
> 
> I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
> 

Hi Release team,

Can you confirm if an rc bug in a packaged listed in recommends will
block testing migration of a package? (in this specific case, the fear
is that rc bug in npm will block nodejs testing migration).

Thanks
Praveen



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#918388: fixed in nodejs 10.15.0~dfsg-8

2019-01-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: reopen -1

On Sun, 06 Jan 2019 10:34:48 + =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsOpbXkgTGFs?=
 wrote:
>* Suggests npm - because nodejs must not be blocked by it.
>  Closes: #918388.

I don't think this reasoning is correct. gitlab recommends gitaly with
the expectation that gitaly andd gitlab could be on different machines.
ruby-rails currently recommends packages not even in the archive
currently and it is not marked for auto removals for that.

I'd be happy to be proven wrong.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel