Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding acorn_6.1.1+ds+~0.3.1+~4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.6.2+ds-1_amd64.changes

2019-08-05 Thread Xavier
Le 05/08/2019 à 14:20, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 5 5:42:17 PM IST, roucaries bastien > wrote: >> In >> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:26 PM Chris Lamb wrote: >>> >>> Dear Jonas et al., >>> What would you suggest/expect as more useful alternative - given >> the constr

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding acorn_6.1.1+ds+~0.3.1+~4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.6.2+ds-1_amd64.changes

2019-08-05 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 2:22 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 5 5:42:17 PM IST, roucaries bastien > wrote: > >In > >On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:26 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > >> > >> Dear Jonas et al., > >> > >> > What would you suggest/expect as more useful alternative - given > >the

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding acorn_6.1.1+ds+~0.3.1+~4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.6.2+ds-1_amd64.changes

2019-08-05 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 5 5:42:17 PM IST, roucaries bastien wrote: >In >On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:26 PM Chris Lamb wrote: >> >> Dear Jonas et al., >> >> > What would you suggest/expect as more useful alternative - given >the >> > constraint set by ftpmasters? >> >> If I may be so bold: this seems to

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding acorn_6.1.1+ds+~0.3.1+~4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.6.2+ds-1_amd64.changes

2019-08-05 Thread roucaries bastien
In On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:26 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > > Dear Jonas et al., > > > What would you suggest/expect as more useful alternative - given the > > constraint set by ftpmasters? > > If I may be so bold: this seems to be a hot button topic for you or I > am somehow entirely incorrectly readin

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding acorn_6.1.1+ds+~0.3.1+~4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.6.2+ds-1_amd64.changes

2019-07-08 Thread Chris Lamb
Dear Jonas et al., > What would you suggest/expect as more useful alternative - given the > constraint set by ftpmasters? If I may be so bold: this seems to be a hot button topic for you or I am somehow entirely incorrectly reading adverserial animosity in the tone of both your messages. This wo

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding acorn_6.1.1+ds+~0.3.1+~4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.6.2+ds-1_amd64.changes

2019-07-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Xavier > To avoid having too many little node packages, ftpmasters asked us to > group packages. Oh sure (I was well aware of this...) I was just musing out loud that I'm not sure that — when it came to it in practice — a *version* of: 6.1.1+ds+~0.3.1+~4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.6.2+ds-1 …

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding acorn_6.1.1+ds+~0.3.1+~4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.6.2+ds-1_amd64.changes

2019-07-07 Thread Xavier
Hello, To avoid having too many little node packages, ftpmasters asked us to group packages. To be able to follow these grouped packages, uscan was modified and we wrote this draft: https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/GroupSourcesTutorial Cheers, Xavier Le 7 juillet 2019 17:38:05 GMT+02:00, Chr

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding acorn_6.1.1+ds+~0.3.1+~4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.6.2+ds-1_amd64.changes

2019-07-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Um, this is not a REJECT but, like, what's with the slightly bananas version number? -- Chris Lamb Sun, 07 Jul 2019 15:35:19 + -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel