On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 4:38 PM Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
> On 9/22/18 5:17 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > No because it is source included. How do you take care of version hell
>
> If a package needs a different version of type definition that shipped
> in node-typescript-types, the module should
On 9/22/18 5:17 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> No because it is source included. How do you take care of version hell
If a package needs a different version of type definition that shipped
in node-typescript-types, the module should be updated or type
definition should be embedded.
signature.as
Le sam. 22 sept. 2018 à 11:36, Pirate Praveen a
écrit :
> On 8/10/18 2:58 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> >
> > - just one node-types-definitelytyped real package would provide all
> > necessary node-types-foo ones, so if a package needs the @types/foo,
> it
> > can depend on node-type
On 8/10/18 2:58 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>
> - just one node-types-definitelytyped real package would provide all
> necessary node-types-foo ones, so if a package needs the @types/foo, it
> can depend on node-types-foo and the right one is pulled in ;
>
>
> No
There is already s
Le jeu. 9 août 2018 à 22:11, Julien Puydt a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Le 09/08/2018 à 09:19, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> > Le 08/08/2018 à 23:35, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> >> I'm not convinced it's the best way to handle the situation, but here
> >> is a simple script I wrote to toy with the idea...
> >>
> >
Hi,
Le 09/08/2018 à 09:19, Julien Puydt a écrit :
Le 08/08/2018 à 23:35, Julien Puydt a écrit :
I'm not convinced it's the best way to handle the situation, but here
is a simple script I wrote to toy with the idea...
(my checkout of upstream DefinitelyTyped is in /tmp, so you might want
to a
Hi,
Le 08/08/2018 à 23:35, Julien Puydt a écrit :
I'm not convinced it's the best way to handle the situation, but here is
a simple script I wrote to toy with the idea...
(my checkout of upstream DefinitelyTyped is in /tmp, so you might want
to adapt the script to your own situation)
Anothe
