Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] use uglify-js 3 when possible, instead of terser

2020-11-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Pirate Praveen (2020-11-06 11:37:45) > Though with more and more browsers supporting ES6 features natively, > transpiling to ES5 may not be necessary for many packages. You talk about code where upstream targets ES6. My recommendation is for code where upstream targets ES5. I do not

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] use uglify-js 3 when possible, instead of terser

2020-11-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 11:26, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I recommend to use uglify-js 3 instead of terser, when possible. * Terser can minify modern code (uglify-js 3 only ES5). * Uglify-js 3 needs 3 nodejs packages to build (terser needs 134). * Uglify-js 3 package is up-to-date (terser is

[Pkg-javascript-devel] use uglify-js 3 when possible, instead of terser

2020-11-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
I recommend to use uglify-js 3 instead of terser, when possible. * Terser can minify modern code (uglify-js 3 only ES5). * Uglify-js 3 needs 3 nodejs packages to build (terser needs 134). * Uglify-js 3 package is up-to-date (terser is 16 months behind). Therefore, for code that is written as