[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#736576: nodejs: FTBFS on various archs

2014-01-25 Thread Julien Cristau
Source: nodejs Version: 0.10.25~dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi, nodejs FTBFS on armel, i386 and kfreebsd-i386, see https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=nodejs === release test-abort-fatal-error === Path:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#679669: tpu upload for #679669 (underscore: build-depends on uglifyjs)

2012-10-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 20:59:24 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Sure. I've attached the debdiff for an upload to wheezy (there's a newer version in unstable). The changes are the same as in the backport. Ack, please go ahead. Thanks, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[Pkg-javascript-devel] updating the jquery squeeze backport?

2012-08-29 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi, I needed a newer jquery in order to backport the ipython package to squeeze, so I was wondering if you would mind me updating jquery in squeeze-backports to 1.7.2+debian-2.1~bpo60+1 (or if you have plans to do it yourself). Cheers, Julien -- Julien Cristau julien.cris...@logilab.fr

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#679665: jquery: diff for NMU version 1.7.2+debian-2.1

2012-08-04 Thread Julien Cristau
+1,12 @@ +jquery (1.7.2+debian-2.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Don't ship minified js, uglify is not in wheezy (closes: #679665). + * Make build a phony target explicitly, since there's a build directory in +the source package. + + -- Julien Cristau jcris

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#682265: Please undo automatic removals of wims, wims-extra, etc. from testing

2012-08-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 08:04:17 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:40:44PM +0200, Georges Khaznadar wrote: If it is still possible, please do accept the NMU for mootools, which makes it buildable in wheezy, then please undo removals for packages wims/4.03a-7,

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#682265: mootools: build-depends on node-uglify, not in wheezy

2012-07-20 Thread Julien Cristau
Source: mootools Version: 1.4.5~debian1-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: w...@packages.debian.org, zonemin...@packages.debian.org Either mootools needs to be removed from wheezy (along with its reverse dependencies zoneminder and wims), or it needs to lose its build-dep on node-uglify. Cheers,

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#679665: Bug#679665: jquery: build-deps not satisfiable in wheezy

2012-07-18 Thread Julien Cristau
ship minified js, uglify is not in wheezy (closes: #679665). + * Make build a phony target explicitly, since there's a build directory in +the source package. + + -- Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Wed, 18 Jul 2012 22:55:36 +0200 + jquery (1.7.2+debian-2) unstable; urgency=low * libjs

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#679665: Bug#679665: jquery: build-deps not satisfiable in wheezy

2012-07-06 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 15:13:41 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: How does that sound? Too complex at this stage? Very much so, I'm afraid. Cheers, Julien ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#679665: jquery: build-deps not satisfiable in wheezy

2012-06-30 Thread Julien Cristau
Source: jquery Version: 1.7.2+debian-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy jquery build-depends on node-uglify, which is not in testing. This needs to be fixed before release somehow. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Please schedule binNMU for rdepends of libv8

2012-05-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 20:25:14 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: Dear release team, to allow removal of old version of libv8 and allow transition of it to testing, please schedule a binnmu for its rdepends: drizzle osmium Done. What about chromium-browser's FTBFS on arm, and libv8-i18n?

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Please schedule binNMU for rdepends of libv8

2012-05-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 20:07:35 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: What's the relation with chromium FTBFS on arm (i guess you mean armel) ? The current version of chromium-browser on arm$whichever depends on the old libv8. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature