Le mardi 06 mai 2014 à 00:34 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
On 5 May 2014 23:20, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
The note says: Based on the Base 64 VLQ implementation in Closure
Compiler,
should I report this in debian/copryright ?
Yes, the file has two copyright holders (and
On 6 May 2014 08:01, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
I worked on it - and then stopped because we're missing component.js :(
Am I missing something? Why should we care about component ?
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
On 6 May 2014 08:01, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
I worked on it - and then stopped because we're missing component.js :(
Am I missing something? Why should we care about component ?
--
Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on
Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com
GPG Key Id -
On 6 May 2014 08:01, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
I worked on it - and then stopped because we're missing component.js :(
Am I missing something? Why should we care about component ?
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Le mardi 06 mai 2014 à 10:23 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
On 6 May 2014 08:01, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
I worked on it - and then stopped because we're missing component.js :(
Am I missing something? Why should we care about component ?
(you cut a little too far here - i don't
Hi all,
about source-map module,
I have found the following in lib/source-map/base64-vlq.js
/*
* Copyright 2011 Mozilla Foundation and contributors
* Licensed under the New BSD license. See LICENSE or:
* http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause
*
* Based on the Base 64 VLQ
Le lundi 05 mai 2014 à 23:08 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
Hi all,
about source-map module,
I have found the following in lib/source-map/base64-vlq.js
/*
* Copyright 2011 Mozilla Foundation and contributors
* Licensed under the New BSD license. See LICENSE or:
*
On 5 May 2014 23:20, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
The note says: Based on the Base 64 VLQ implementation in Closure Compiler,
should I report this in debian/copryright ?
Yes, the file has two copyright holders (and two licenses which happen
to be identical).
Good! (locally done, I
On 30 April 2014 22:25, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 22:11 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
node-character-parser is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-character-parser.git
The long description is not clear enough.
Also it
On 1 May 2014 02:10, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 01:11 +0200, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 00:18 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-04-30 23:26:44)
On 30 April 2014 23:11, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
It's
node-character-parser is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-character-parser.git
On 30 April 2014 21:48, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote:
node-css-parse is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git
--
Ubuntu
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 21:48 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
node-css-parse is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git
* upstream is actually
https://github.com/reworkcss/css-parse
* benchmarks/large.css must be excluded, for it contains way too
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 22:11 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
node-character-parser is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-character-parser.git
On 30 April 2014 21:48, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote:
node-css-parse is ready here:
On 30 April 2014 22:20, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 21:48 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
node-css-parse is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git
* upstream is actually
https://github.com/reworkcss/css-parse
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 22:55 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
On 30 April 2014 22:20, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 21:48 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
node-css-parse is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git
Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-04-30 23:26:44)
On 30 April 2014 23:11, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
It's not all right to remove other files without good reasons.
Here, you can have a doubt about the license of the other css file, but
there is no doubt the js file is correctly licensed,
Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 01:11 +0200, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 00:18 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-04-30 23:26:44)
On 30 April 2014 23:11, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
It's not all right to remove other files without good reasons.
17 matches
Mail list logo
