[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#611698: marked as done (nodejs: conflicts with package node needlessly)

2012-07-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:17:24 + with message-id e1swh0w-0001hk...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#611698: fixed in nodejs 0.6.19~dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #611698, regarding nodejs: conflicts with package node needlessly to be marked as done. This means

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#678563: marked as done (nodejs-dev: node-waf ignores LINKFLAGS (e.g. to enable security hardening LDFLAGS))

2012-07-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:17:24 + with message-id e1swh0w-0001ho...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#678563: fixed in nodejs 0.6.19~dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #678563, regarding nodejs-dev: node-waf ignores LINKFLAGS (e.g. to enable security hardening LDFLAGS)

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#681360: marked as done (Provide /usr/bin/nodejs in nodejs with /usr/bin/node legacy package)

2012-07-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:17:24 + with message-id e1swh0w-0001hv...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#681360: fixed in nodejs 0.6.19~dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #681360, regarding Provide /usr/bin/nodejs in nodejs with /usr/bin/node legacy package to be marked as

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-jslint_0.1.8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2012-07-31 Thread Luca Falavigna
Hi, The lib/jslint.js license additionally says This software shall be used for Good, not Evil.. This is unfortunate, as this formula seems to violate DFSG #6. Asking upstream to drop this line would be very welcome. Cheers, Luca === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-jslint_0.1.8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2012-07-31 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 06:40:39PM +, Luca Falavigna wrote: Hi, The lib/jslint.js license additionally says This software shall be used for Good, not Evil.. This is unfortunate, as this formula seems to violate DFSG #6. Asking upstream to drop this line would be very welcome. Eeekk.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of uglifyjs_1.2.6-2_i386.changes

2012-07-31 Thread Debian FTP Masters
uglifyjs_1.2.6-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: uglifyjs_1.2.6-2.dsc uglifyjs_1.2.6-2.debian.tar.gz node-uglify_1.2.6-2_all.deb libnode-uglify_1.2.6-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

[Pkg-javascript-devel] uglifyjs_1.2.6-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-07-31 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: libnode-uglify_1.2.6-2_all.deb to main/u/uglifyjs/libnode-uglify_1.2.6-2_all.deb node-uglify_1.2.6-2_all.deb to main/u/uglifyjs/node-uglify_1.2.6-2_all.deb uglifyjs_1.2.6-2.debian.tar.gz to main/u/uglifyjs/uglifyjs_1.2.6-2.debian.tar.gz uglifyjs_1.2.6-2.dsc to

[Pkg-javascript-devel] About nodejs Breaks list

2012-07-31 Thread Marcelo Jorge Vieira
Hi Jonas, Hi Jérémy, Thanks for the great work against nodejs package! =D I have some questions. Why both node-colors and node-skin-test were added to the nodejs Breaks list? These packages do not reference /usr/bin/node. Cheers, -- Marcelo Jorge Vieira xmpp:me...@jabber-br.org