Hi Jérémy,
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 17:31 +, nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote:
> Jérémy Bobbio (lunar) has requested to join your project.
> You can approve this request here:
> https://alioth.debian.org/project/admin/users.php?group_id=100128
>
> Comments by the user:
> Hi!
>
> I am working
Vous êtes un chef d'entreprise,un investisseur privé, ou mieux une
personne ayant besoin de
financement rapide compte tenu d'une situation. En collaboration avec
mon équipe, nous
avons une solution à vos problème.Nous pouvons vous offrir un prêt en
ligne en 48 heures à
un taux de 3% et 3,5% l'an
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Whenever this idea has come up (including the current /javascript
> implementation) I have always thought it was a bad idea, especially
> for JavaScript. Exposing more than absolutely needed for each website
> at minimum is an information leakag
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> sorry to be late to the discussion!
>
> I quite like the idea that we can make it easy for web site
> administrators who use debian (and fedora!) to avoid the evil CDNs for
> their standard javascript.
No problem, thanks for chiming in
My name is Miss Sandra damah, female 30 years of a age. I am sending you this
message believing that you could help me,As a matter of fact, my late father
was killed recently by the politicians and been the only child, i have given it
a second thought to re-locate to any were in the world.
Furth
Quoting Daniel Kahn Gillmor (2013-08-22 05:23:17)
> > It doesn't make any sense to me to hardcode a filesystem path into
> > applications written in dynamic languages that you'll never be able
> > to just open with Firefox anyway. There's a reason there's a
> > separate namespace for content se
On 22/08/2013 09:34, Paul Wise wrote:
> Whenever this idea has come up (including the current /javascript
> implementation) I have always thought it was a bad idea, especially
> for JavaScript. Exposing more than absolutely needed for each website
> at minimum is an information leakage. With JS or
Whenever this idea has come up (including the current /javascript
implementation) I have always thought it was a bad idea, especially
for JavaScript. Exposing more than absolutely needed for each website
at minimum is an information leakage. With JS or CSS it might lead to
security issues in the we
