Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:34:24 +0200
Source: eonasdan-bootstrap-datetimepicker
Binary: libjs-eonasdan-bootstrap-datetimepicker
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.17.47-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer:
On ചൊവ്വ 10 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 01:03 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Pirate,
>
>> Now with those files removed from the source tarball, lets move on.
>> Please see if the current uploads in NEW meets the criteria.
>
> Please try and refrain such emotionally-driven comments in future. I
> hope it is clear
> > The obvious solution to me is to remove the accidental reference in
> > debian/copyright, not remove the file which contains some meta-copyright
> > message.
>
> If this was suggested early on, we did not have to go through this long
> thread
This makes me worry we are still not in sync
binary:node-d3-dsv is NEW.
binary:node-d3-dsv is NEW.
source:node-d3-dsv is NEW.
node-d3-dsv_1.0.7.orig.tar.gz is only available in NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP
node-d3-hierarchy_1.1.5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-d3-hierarchy_1.1.5-1.dsc
node-d3-hierarchy_1.1.5.orig.tar.gz
node-d3-hierarchy_1.1.5-1.debian.tar.xz
node-d3-hierarchy_1.1.5-1_all.deb
node-d3-hierarchy_1.1.5-1_amd64.buildinfo
eonasdan-bootstrap-datetimepicker_4.17.47-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully
to localhost
along with the files:
eonasdan-bootstrap-datetimepicker_4.17.47-1.dsc
eonasdan-bootstrap-datetimepicker_4.17.47.orig.tar.gz
eonasdan-bootstrap-datetimepicker_4.17.47-1.debian.tar.xz
On ചൊവ്വ 10 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 02:35 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote:
> But this is part of the license's documentation, not a statement about
> the package itself.
> It is part of the "How to apply the Apache License to your work"
> boilerplate...
>
I knew that much, hence I added the comment that author
On ചൊവ്വ 10 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 02:40 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I knew that much, hence I added the comment that author name is missing.
> Now if there is a LICENSE file in a directory, won't it apply to all
> files in that directory? Or should I just add Copyright: NONE?
I was wrongly thinking
On ചൊവ്വ 10 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 02:08 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote:
> This makes me worry we are still not in sync about what the problem is...
>
> Ignore this package for now: if I, totally by accident, mispasted a line
> into a debian/copyright file, the solution would be to remove such a line,
> no? Not
> > This makes me worry we are still not in sync about what the problem is...
[…]
> You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
> [] [name of copyright owner]
> license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
> patent, trademark, and
But this is part of the
node-d3-random_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-d3-random_1.1.0-1.dsc
node-d3-random_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz
node-d3-random_1.1.0-1.debian.tar.xz
node-d3-random_1.1.0-1_all.deb
node-d3-random_1.1.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your
Pirate,
> Now with those files removed from the source tarball, lets move on.
> Please see if the current uploads in NEW meets the criteria.
Please try and refrain such emotionally-driven comments in future. I
hope it is clear I attempted to be friendly and reset the frame of this
discussion,
binary:node-d3-random is NEW.
binary:node-d3-random is NEW.
source:node-d3-random is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please
On ചൊവ്വ 10 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 03:05 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Sorry about the whole discussion escalating to this level.
Just add context, I was asked to add this to copyright file by another
ftp master and it was not found by licensecheck.
node-d3-dsv_1.0.7-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-d3-dsv_1.0.7-2.dsc
node-d3-dsv_1.0.7-2.debian.tar.xz
node-d3-dsv_1.0.7-2_all.deb
node-d3-dsv_1.0.7-2_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:06:21 +0530
Source: node-ejs
Binary: node-ejs
Architecture: source
Version: 2.5.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
On ചൊവ്വ 10 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 06:08 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
> I will also file a RM request later to remove node-d3-format, since it
> shouldn't have been accepted into Debian in the first place. Please do your
> research properly next time before filing ITPs.
This happened because npm2deb search
binary:node-d3-hierarchy is NEW.
binary:node-d3-hierarchy is NEW.
source:node-d3-hierarchy is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so
node-ejs_2.5.7-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-ejs_2.5.7-1.dsc
node-ejs_2.5.7.orig.tar.gz
node-ejs_2.5.7-1.debian.tar.xz
node-ejs_2.5.7-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:node-d3-format
Bug #877213 [node-d3-format] node-d3-format: B-D npm not available in testing
Bug reassigned from package 'node-d3-format' to 'src:node-d3-format'.
No longer marked as found in versions node-d3-format/1.2.0-1.
Ignoring request to alter
node-regjsparser_0.2.1+ds-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-regjsparser_0.2.1+ds-3.dsc
node-regjsparser_0.2.1+ds-3.debian.tar.xz
node-regjsparser_0.2.1+ds-3_all.deb
node-regjsparser_0.2.1+ds-3_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:27:23 +0200
Source: node-regjsparser
Binary: node-regjsparser
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.1+ds-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Pirate Praveen:
> On ചൊവ്വ 10 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 06:08 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> I will also file a RM request later to remove node-d3-format, since it
>> shouldn't have been accepted into Debian in the first place. Please do your
>> research properly next time before filing ITPs.
> This happened
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 20:52:14 +0200
Source: node-regexpu-core
Binary: node-regexpu-core
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.1.2+ds-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
node-regexpu-core_4.1.2+ds-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-regexpu-core_4.1.2+ds-2.dsc
node-regexpu-core_4.1.2+ds-2.debian.tar.xz
node-regexpu-core_4.1.2+ds-2_all.deb
node-regexpu-core_4.1.2+ds-2_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian
Hi,
> > Where it is used is not material here
>
> There is a difference which missed to articulate in previous replies. If
> it is an optional component like only used for tests, we can just get
> rid of it without affecting the functionality.
No.
Pirate, please read over the following
On ചൊവ്വ 10 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 12:31 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote:
> No.
>
> Pirate, please read over the following extremely carefully before replying
> as I would like to avoid either of us becoming frustrated by these repeated
> failures at conversation.
>
> The situation, as I understand it, is as
node-tough-cookie 2.3.2+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2017-11-01
It is affected by these RC bugs:
877660: node-tough-cookie: CVE-2017-15010
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
FYI: The status of the node-tape source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.6.3-1
Current version: 4.8.0+20172409gitb66f8f80928bb-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple
FYI: The status of the node-srs source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.4.8+dfsg-3
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/pochu>
# 20171009; done 20171010
# gdal transition
The
FYI: The status of the node-vlq source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.2.2-1
Current version: 0.2.3-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the node-millstone source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.6.8-1
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/pochu>
# 20171009; done 20171010
# gdal transition
The
32 matches
Mail list logo
