[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#648506: marked as done (libv8: FTBFS against libicu48)

2011-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:23:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#648506: fixed in libv8 3.4.14.21-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #648506, regarding libv8: FTBFS against libicu48 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

[Pkg-javascript-devel] libv8_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-11-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: libv8-3.4.14.21_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.deb to main/libv/libv8/libv8-3.4.14.21_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.deb libv8-dbg_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.deb to main/libv/libv8/libv8-dbg_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.deb libv8-dev_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.deb to main/libv/libv8/libv8-dev_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.deb libv8_3.4.14.21-5.d

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of libv8_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.changes

2011-11-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libv8_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libv8_3.4.14.21-5.dsc libv8_3.4.14.21-5.debian.tar.gz libv8-dev_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.deb libv8-3.4.14.21_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.deb libv8-dbg_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemo

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of libv8_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.changes

2011-11-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libv8_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: libv8_3.4.14.21-5.dsc libv8_3.4.14.21-5.debian.tar.gz libv8-dev_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.deb libv8-3.4.14.21_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.deb libv8-dbg_3.4.14.21-5_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#648506: libv8: diff for NMU version 3.4.14.21-4.1

2011-11-15 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 15/11/2011 22:39, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 22:28:06 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> On 15/11/2011 21:32, Jakub Wilk wrote: >>> tags 648506 + patch >>> tags 648506 + pending >>> thanks >>> >>> Dear maintainer, >>> >>> I've prepared an NMU for libv8 (versioned as 3.4.14.21-4.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#648506: libv8: diff for NMU version 3.4.14.21-4.1

2011-11-15 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 15/11/2011 21:32, Jakub Wilk wrote: > tags 648506 + patch > tags 648506 + pending > thanks > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for libv8 (versioned as 3.4.14.21-4.1) and uploaded it > to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. > Why the rush ? v8 3.5 su

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of libv8_3.4.14.21-4.1_i386.changes

2011-11-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libv8_3.4.14.21-4.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libv8_3.4.14.21-4.1.dsc libv8_3.4.14.21-4.1.debian.tar.gz libv8-dev_3.4.14.21-4.1_i386.deb libv8-3.4.14.21_3.4.14.21-4.1_i386.deb libv8-dbg_3.4.14.21-4.1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian que

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#648506: libv8: diff for NMU version 3.4.14.21-4.1

2011-11-15 Thread Jakub Wilk
tags 648506 + patch tags 648506 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libv8 (versioned as 3.4.14.21-4.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. -- Jakub Wilk diffstat for libv8-3.4.14.21 libv8-3.4.14.21 changelog

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: libv8: diff for NMU version 3.4.14.21-4.1

2011-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 648506 + patch Bug #648506 [libv8] libv8: FTBFS against libicu48 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 648506 + pending Bug #648506 [libv8] libv8: FTBFS against libicu48 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: bug 648506 is forwarded to http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1561

2011-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 648506 http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1561 Bug #648506 [libv8] libv8: FTBFS against libicu48 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1561'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please c

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Is anyone maintaining (the ham radio tool) node?

2011-11-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 11-11-09 at 08:33am, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2011-11-08, Patrick Ouellette wrote: > > I hope to avoid any issues with breaking old boxes with the eventual > > resolution of the issue. > > I don't know what's wrong with Jonathan Nieder's advise in [0] about > helping users with the conversio