Hello,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:21:39PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Hi,
version 3.5 of autopkgtest has a default test/control
for ruby or perl packages.
Node.js modules could also have a similar default test control:
require('themodule')) where themodule is taken after package name
cajun_2.0.3-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libcajun-dev_2.0.3-2_all.deb
cajun_2.0.3-2.dsc
cajun_2.0.3-2.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
___
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:43:43 +0200
Source: cajun
Binary: libcajun-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Package: node-jake
Version: 0.7.9-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Trying to do a bunch of backports, I came across this issue.
node-utilities build-depends: node-jake
node-jake depends: node-utilities
So, it's impossible to build node-utilities, because it needs node-jake,
which cannot be installed,
Package: node-utilities
Version: 0.0.31-1
Severity: serious
The test-suite of node-utilities uses node-jake, which itself uses
node-utilities. So, effectively, node-utilities is build-depending on
itself, which should never happen, and which by the way isn't even
declared in the debian/control
Package: npm
Version: 1.4.21+ds-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please downgrade the required version of node-ansi to be:
= 0.3.0-2~
and not just:
= 0.3.0-2
so that one can do/use a backported version of node-ansi.
Thanks.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
FYI: The status of the validator.js source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 3.17.0+dfsg1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
Package: node-should
Version: 4.0.4+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
As per the title of this bug, node-mocha should be packaged, or should.js
should not build-depend on it.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
I am working on packaging jsondiffpatch:
https://github.com/benjamine/jsondiffpatch
This would be:
Source package: jsondiffpatch.js
Node package: node-jsondiffpatch
libjs package: libjs-jsondiffpatch
Node package part is done. The hard part is the libjs package. The
repository ships with
On 15 September 2014 20:19, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote:
I am working on packaging jsondiffpatch:
https://github.com/benjamine/jsondiffpatch
This would be:
Source package: jsondiffpatch.js
Node package: node-jsondiffpatch
libjs package: libjs-jsondiffpatch
Node package part
Please read this answer i made a couple of months ago:
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2014-June/008013.html
ACK. Thanks for the quick response - I appreciate you're in a
difficult situation. :-/. Do you have any feel for progress towards
nodejs 0.12 /
On 15 September 2014 19:42, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
As per the title of this bug, node-mocha should be packaged, or should.js
should not build-depend on it.
Hi Thomas,
node-mocha is provided by mocha package:
Package: mocha
Source: node-mocha
...
Provides: node-mocha
On 15 September 2014 19:42, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
As per the title of this bug, node-mocha should be packaged, or should.js
should not build-depend on it.
Hi Thomas,
node-mocha is provided by mocha, see:
$ apt-cache show mocha | grep ^Provides
13 matches
Mail list logo
