[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-es5-shim_4.2.0-1_source.changes

node-es5-shim_4.2.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-es5-shim_4.2.0-1.dsc node-es5-shim_4.2.0.orig.tar.gz node-es5-shim_4.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

On 2015-11-05 09:52:19, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic: > > https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik is that a fork of tilemill? how does it differ? maybe a new ITP should be opened for this then? -- C'est avec les pierres de la loi qu'on a

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

On 2015-11-05 16:59, Antoine Beaupré wrote: On 2015-11-05 09:52:19, Bas Couwenberg wrote: The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic: https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik is that a fork of tilemill? how does it differ? It's not a fork. It's not a Mapbox project.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

2015-11-05 17:04 GMT+01:00 Bas Couwenberg : > On 2015-11-05 16:59, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > >> On 2015-11-05 09:52:19, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> >>> The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic: >>> >>> https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik >>> >> >> is that

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

This are moving fast out there. Mapbox folks have released a new product in september 2014 named "Mapbox studio classic": https://www.mapbox.com/mapbox-studio-classic/#linux The code is still free: https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-studio-classic It seems to be a fork of tilemill:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic: https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org