[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: tagging 815436, tagging 824547, found 824581 in 1:3.7.0~repack-1, found 824400 in 1:5.1.3-1 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 815436 + patch Bug #815436 [afnix] afnix: FTBFS nearly everywhere Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #815436 to the same tags previously set > tags 824547 + sid stretch Bug #824547 [src:node-css-parse] node-css-parse: don't ship in

[Pkg-javascript-devel] dompurify.js_0.7.4~dfsg1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:09:05 -0400 Source: dompurify.js Binary: libjs-dompurify node-dompurify Architecture: source all Version: 0.7.4~dfsg1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Javascript

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of dompurify.js_0.7.4~dfsg1-1_amd64.changes

dompurify.js_0.7.4~dfsg1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dompurify.js_0.7.4~dfsg1-1.dsc dompurify.js_0.7.4~dfsg1.orig.tar.gz dompurify.js_0.7.4~dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz libjs-dompurify_0.7.4~dfsg1-1_all.deb node-dompurify_0.7.4~dfsg1-1_all.deb

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#802224: Upstream is now up to 0.5.6

Can you plase ask someone else in #debian-js for the ACK?.. I'm a bit busy these weeks. Sorry for this! L. On 18 May 2016 at 15:02, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi L3on, > > > What do you think of the current package? Is it worth an upload? [If so, > > notice I

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#802224: Upstream is now up to 0.5.6

Hi L3on, > What do you think of the current package? Is it worth an upload? [If so, > notice I can't do it as I'm no DD (yet)] since this is blocking node-recast from being installed by the end users, I can sponsor the package if you give me an ack on the changes. thanks! Gianfranco