[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-mapnik 3.7.1+dfsg-3 MIGRATED to testing

2018-04-11 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the node-mapnik source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 3.7.1+dfsg-2
  Current version:  3.7.1+dfsg-3

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-ip REMOVED from testing

2018-04-11 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the node-ip source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.1.5-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #892658: node-ip FTBFS with mocha 4.0.1-3

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#892656: even more tests fail with version 2.0.2

2018-04-11 Thread Pirate Praveen 


On April 12, 2018 2:48:32 AM GMT+05:30, Paolo Greppi  
wrote:
>Normally you'd expect to fix bugs with a new version, in this case
>while trying to update node-define-property 1.0.0-1 -> 2.0.2 the
>failing tests actually increased from 1 to 4.
>
>What puzzled me was that no tests fail on upstream's CI (travis), which
>also tests nodejs version 8.
>
>Turns out that we have upgraded node-is-descriptor to version 2.0.0,
>but the npm registry only has 1.0.2.
>
>I have forwarded the issue upstream, and I expect upstream to answer
>that define-property correctly pins the major version of is-descriptor
>with ^1.0.2 (https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/semver), stating that it won't
>work with 2.x.
>
>^1.0.2 should be translated with >= 1.0.2 && < 2.0.0 but we can't
>encode that in debian/control.
>
>So how can we check reverse dependencies for this type of issues in the
>future ?
>
>Paolo

build-and-upload script from ruby-team/meta can help if we have enabled tests. 
If we used that, then is-descriptor 1.0 -> 2.0 update would notify the failure 
before upload. But its likely we added is-descriptor 2.0 directly.

The best choice is upstream updating their dependency. Second choice is we 
update and send merge request.

As a worse case, we can downgrade node-is-descriptor to 1.0 if we have no other 
reverse dependency or embed 1.0 in node-define-property.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Please add me (back?) to the team

2018-04-11 Thread Julien Puydt 
Hi,

I'm already part of the teams, but as jpuydt-guest, and I would
now need to be part of the same teams as jpuydt, as I just completed the
process to become a DD.

If I remember well, I'm part of:
- Debian Science
- Debian Python Module Team
- Debian Javascript packagers

Thanks,

Snark on irc.debian.org

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#892656: even more tests fail with version 2.0.2

2018-04-11 Thread Paolo Greppi 
Normally you'd expect to fix bugs with a new version, in this case while trying 
to update node-define-property 1.0.0-1 -> 2.0.2 the failing tests actually 
increased from 1 to 4.

What puzzled me was that no tests fail on upstream's CI (travis), which also 
tests nodejs version 8.

Turns out that we have upgraded node-is-descriptor to version 2.0.0, but the 
npm registry only has 1.0.2.

I have forwarded the issue upstream, and I expect upstream to answer that 
define-property correctly pins the major version of is-descriptor with ^1.0.2 
(https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/semver), stating that it won't work with 2.x.

^1.0.2 should be translated with >= 1.0.2 && < 2.0.0 but we can't encode that 
in debian/control.

So how can we check reverse dependencies for this type of issues in the future ?

Paolo

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: forwarded upstream

2018-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 892656 https://github.com/jonschlinkert/define-property/issues/3
Bug #892656 [src:node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS and Debci 
failure
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://github.com/jonschlinkert/define-property/issues/3'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
892656: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892656
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed (with 2 errors): unblock 787080 with 856192, forcibly merging 787080 894119

2018-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unblock 787080 with 856192
Bug #787080 [wnpp] ITP: libreoffice-online -- LibreOffice on-line
No valid blocking bug(s) given; not doing anything
Failed to set blocking bugs of 787080: Unknown/archived blocking bug(s):856192.

> forcemerge 787080 894119
Bug #787080 [wnpp] ITP: libreoffice-online -- LibreOffice on-line
Bug #894119 [wnpp] RFP: libreoffice-online
894119 was blocked by: 804633 794890
894119 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 894119: 857986
894119 was blocked by: 857986 794890 804633
894119 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 894119: 870460
No valid blocking bug(s) given; not doing anything
Failed to forcibly merge 787080: Failure while trying to adjust bugs, please 
report this as a bug: Unknown/archived blocking bug(s):856192.
 at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control.pm line 2133.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
787080: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787080
894119: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894119
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#894119: libreoffice: Please add libreoffice-online to the debian repository.

2018-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 894119 RFP: libreoffice-online
Bug #894119 [libreoffice] libreoffice: Please add libreoffice-online to the 
debian repository.
Changed Bug title to 'RFP: libreoffice-online' from 'libreoffice: Please add 
libreoffice-online to the debian repository.'.
> reassign 894119 wnpp
Bug #894119 [libreoffice] RFP: libreoffice-online
Bug reassigned from package 'libreoffice' to 'wnpp'.
No longer marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:5.2.7-1+deb9u3.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #894119 to the same values 
previously set
> forcemerge 787080 894119
Bug #787080 [wnpp] ITP: libreoffice-online -- LibreOffice on-line
Bug #894119 [wnpp] RFP: libreoffice-online
894119 was not blocked by any bugs.
894119 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 894119: 804633 and 794890
No valid blocking bug(s) given; not doing anything
Failed to forcibly merge 787080: Failure while trying to adjust bugs, please 
report this as a bug: Unknown/archived blocking bug(s):856192.
 at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control.pm line 2133.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
787080: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787080
894119: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894119
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-detect-file 1.0.0, node-resolve-dir 1.0.1 and node-flagged-respawn 1.0.0

2018-04-11 Thread Paolo Greppi 
Hi, I have moved the repos to salsa and prepared the updates mentioned in the 
subject.

This is all required to update node-liftoff to 2.5.0 (hoping that fixes 
https://bugs.debian.org/853035).

Please someone allow me DM upload access for these packages or sponsor the 
uploads:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-detect-file
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-node-resolve-dir
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-flagged-respawn

Paolo

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#853035: WIP

2018-04-11 Thread Paolo Greppi 
You can track the status here:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-liftoff/wikis/home

Paolo

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel