[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#841286: jison depends on contrib packages (node-ebnf-parser, node-cjson)

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:56:08 +0200 Jakub Wilk wrote: > This package is in main, but it depends on node-ebnf-parser and node-cjson, > which are both in contrib. These were uploaded in contrib because they were built using jison from npm (bootstrapping circular dependency). Now

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-jsonselect_0.4.0+dfsg2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 2016, ഒക്‌ടോബർ 15 5:30:08 AM IST, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > >Hi, > >please mention: >JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/site/css/droid_sans.tt >JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/site/js/showdown.js

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#840760: node-livescript: FTBFS (npm: Command not found)

Control: -1 tags pending On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:10:01 + Santiago Vila wrote: > npm install jison > make[1]: npm: Command not found jison is just uploaded to debian, so npm is no longer required. Once it clears NEW, I'll upload a fixed version that uses jison package via

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-livescript_1.5.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Thursday 13 October 2016 12:30 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: > > scripts/preroll mentions some other authors not in d/copyright Fixed and uploaded. > -- Chris Lamb Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:48:47 + > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-os-homedir_1.0.2-1_amd64.changes is NEW

On Tuesday 18 October 2016 11:00 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:node-os-homedir is NEW. > source:node-os-homedir is NEW. > > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action > from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good > OpenPGP

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#840929: failed to create proper watch file even though homepage is set in package.json and tags are present

On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:36:16 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> wrote: > > node module where this happened: repeat-string > Also failed for https://github.com/isaacs/isexe/releases signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#841995: when package.json has a files section, install them

package: npm2deb severity: important version: 0.2.5-1 Example module builtin-modules signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#841994: when bower.json is present, create libjs-xxx package

package: npm2deb version: 0.2.5-1 severity: wishlist An example module is jquery-textcomplete signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#842023: update jsdom to a version that does not require contextify

package: node-jsdom version: 0.8.10+dfsg1-1 severity: serious Justification: depends on a package that is planned to be removed Control: block 842022 by -1 contextify has rc bugs and is going to be removed. It is required for node < 0.12 only. jsdom should be updated to a version that does not

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#844312: please include package.json for bundled modules

package: node-should version: 8.4.0~dfsg-1 severity: important Without this every module that looks for node-should needs patching. Right now, this fails for node-nodeunit Error: Cannot find module 'should-type' at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:325:15) at

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-regenerator-runtime_0.9.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Thursday 03 November 2016 03:30 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi, > > unfortunately I have to reject your package. > > Please mention at least package/runtime.js in your debian/copyright. Fixed and uploaded. > Thanks! > Thorsten > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-babel-runtime_6.18.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

On Sunday 20 November 2016 10:34 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:node-babel-runtime is NEW. > binary:node-babel-runtime is NEW. > source:node-babel-runtime is NEW. > > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action > from the ftpteam to process. The upload was

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency

On Tuesday 22 November 2016 10:53 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Ah, I understand you now: You present breakage when using code not in > Debian. Quite confusing - please *always* mention explicitly in > bugports when using non-Debian packages! Sorry, that was mostly meant a self note (I should

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#845515: please update node-rimraf to latest upstream version

package: node-rimraf version: 2.2.8-1 severity: wishlist with current version node-y18n tests fail, once rimraf is updated, we can enable node-y18n tests. Also many other libs would benefit from a recent version. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] testing during build is useless now with autopkgtests

On 2016, നവംബർ 26 6:34:26 PM IST, "Jérémy Lal" wrote: >Hi, > >i've been doing in all my latest uploads this setup: >- autopkgtest runs the package test suite >- build does not run tests > >Because: >1) it feels wrong to add Depends to Build-Depends, >and debian/tests/control

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-cliui 3.2.0

On Saturday 26 November 2016 03:05 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, > > I packaged node-cliui as per this ITP: > https://bugs.debian.org/845266, this is the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-cliui.git > it's set up for git-buildpackage and pristine-tar. > > Please someone

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-grunt-contrib-coffee_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

On Saturday 19 November 2016 10:19 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:node-grunt-contrib-coffee is NEW. > binary:node-grunt-contrib-coffee is NEW. > source:node-grunt-contrib-coffee is NEW. > > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action > from the ftpteam to

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-grunt-contrib-nodeunit_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Wednesday 23 November 2016 03:30 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Missing attribution for Ben Alman (and possibly more). > > -- Chris Lamb Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:34:52 + > Fixed. > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#845379: Bug#845379: node-fuzzaldrin-plus: FTBFS: Npm module "grunt-contrib-coffee" not found.

Control: tags -1 pending On Wednesday 23 November 2016 03:04 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Warning: Task "coffee" not found. Use --force to continue. missed builddeps on node-grunt-contrib-coffee. Fixed. But node-grunt-contrib-coffee needs to clear NEW. signature.asc Description:

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-string-width 2.0.0

On Tuesday 22 November 2016 04:38 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, > > I packaged node-string-width as per this ITP > https://bugs.debian.org/845240, this is the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-string-width.git > it's set up for git-buildpackage. > > Please someone more

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-window-size_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Tuesday 22 November 2016 03:30 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi, > > this doesn't work, does it? > W: node-window-size: unusual-interpreter usr/lib/nodejs/window-size/cli.js > #!node Ah! I overlooked that as another warning about lack of execution permission. Fixed. > Thorsten > > >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency

On Mon, 05 Sep 2016 12:03:22 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > Hi Praveen, > > Quoting Pirate Praveen (2016-09-05 09:22:06) > > nodejs bin/uglifyjs --help > > module.js:339 > > throw err; > > ^ > > > > Error: Cannot find mo

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#845605: update node-lru-cache to latest upstream release

package: node-lru-cache version: 2.3.1-1 severity: wishlist this is required for updating node-cross-spawn and which in turn is required for packaging execa. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#845975: update node-through2 to latest upstream release

package: node-through2 version: 1.1.1-1 severity: wishlist cloneable-readable (dependency for gulp) needs through2 >= 2.0.1 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-yargs_6.4.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Sunday 27 November 2016 08:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi, > > please take care of all FIX_MEs in debian/*. Fixed. Filed a wishlist bug (#846009) against lintian so we can find it before upload. > Thanks! > Thorsten > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] testing during build is useless now with autopkgtests

On 2016, നവംബർ 26 6:34:26 PM IST, "Jérémy Lal" wrote: >Hi, > >i've been doing in all my latest uploads this setup: >- autopkgtest runs the package test suite >- build does not run tests > >Because: >1) it feels wrong to add Depends to Build-Depends, >and debian/tests/control

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-yargs_6.4.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Sunday 27 November 2016 11:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > almost done: Andrei Mackenzie is missing ... fixed and uploaded. > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Using clean build scripts from pkg-ruby-extras repo

On 2016, നവംബർ 28 10:27:15 PM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote: >Hi this is opinionated but very useful. I have a couple of newbie >questions. > >Did you try these scripts on Debian stable as host ? No, I have not tried. >Why do we need two virtualization systems (schroot for

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency

On ചൊവ്വ 29 നവംബര്‍ 2016 11:38 രാവിലെ, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > How? Please elaborate! > > Checking now with freshly updated unstable+incoming archives and it > still fails to satisfy dependencies. I should have mentioned node-cross-spawn-async 2.2.5-2 (I had drafted such a mail, but

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency

On 2016, നവംബർ 29 10:05:58 AM IST, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >Cannot build the new uglifyjs until bug#846076 is resolved. This is now fixed. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Using clean build scripts from pkg-ruby-extras repo

Hi, I find these scripts very useful so I thought of sharing it more widely. I use it for ruby, go and nodejs packages. Scripts are here https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-ruby-extras/pkg-ruby-extras.git 1. git clone 2. add cloned location to PATH, 3. and run `setup`, (this will create sbuild

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lru-cache_4.0.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On തിങ്കള്‍ 28 നവംബര്‍ 2016 05:49 രാവിലെ, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >* New upstream version 4.0.2 This broke node-cross-spawn-aysnc, I think this type of dependency declaration is not sustainable.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#846076: node-cross-spawn-async dependencies are too strict

age Subject: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lru-cache_4.0.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:18:00 +0100 From: Jérémy Lal <kapo...@melix.org> To: Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> CC: Debian Javascript Maintainers <pkg-javascript-devel@lists

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#844905: node-nan: FTBFS: Tests failures

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 08:02:29 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. From upstream discussion, "The bug is that the Global destructor runs at process exit and tries to free the object slot but that

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-to-fast-properties_1.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Tuesday 22 November 2016 03:30 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi, > > to-fast-properties-1.0.2/license seems to contain a different person than > your debian/coypright. > > Thorsten Fixed. > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your

[Pkg-javascript-devel] help browseifying fuzzaldrin-plus

Hi, Can someone help browserify fuzzaldrin-plus? This will allow me to use packaged libjs-fuzzaldrin-plus instead of embedded fuzzarldin-plus.js in gitlab. You'll need to build node-grunt-contrib-coffee from alioth and run grunt to covert .coffee to .js Also it would be nice if we have a

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] using packaged grunt (globally installed grunt)

On Saturday 12 November 2016 04:31 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > Using globally installed grunt is not supported upstream (see > https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-cli/issues/10). With > https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-cli/pull/55 patch, I was able to ignore > the error bu

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] grunt_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 2016, നവംബർ 12 4:30:10 AM IST, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > >Hi, > >according to > https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt/issues/1478 >and an entry in the CHANGELOG, the copyright holder is no longer Ben >but the jQuery Foundation. So please update your

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] help browseifying fuzzaldrin-plus

On Friday 18 November 2016 09:16 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Also it would be nice if we have a grunt-browserify-lite module which > will allow us to just change browserify task to browserify-lite in > Gruntfile and be done. Requested this feature upstream, but if any of you her

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] help browseifying fuzzaldrin-plus

On Friday 18 November 2016 09:16 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Though the released version of fuzzaldrin-plus does not have browserify > task in Gruntfile, github master branch has it. After downloading the master branch, I could get browserify-lite to work. So it looks like browserify-li

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#845227: generate sub modules like lodash.isplainobject

package: node-lodash severity: important version: 4.16.6+dfsg-1 control: block -1 by 836722 Some dependencies for gulp [1] declare dependencies like lodash.assignwith which current lodash package is not providing. Though this would require updating unglifyjs as current version throws and error

[Pkg-javascript-devel] using packaged grunt (globally installed grunt)

Hi, Using globally installed grunt is not supported upstream (see https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-cli/issues/10). With https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-cli/pull/55 patch, I was able to ignore the error but it fails to read package.json now $ grunt Loading "Gruntfile.js" tasks...ERROR >> Error:

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] 2 NMUs for node-findup-sync

On Tuesday 01 November 2016 03:09 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: > That's a very helpful overview, and it makes it clear that it's quite a > lot of work. Yup, we have been doing it for some time as part of igg.me/at/debian-browserify campaign. > - node-os-homedir has an ITP bug

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] How debian manages npm module version conflicts ?

On Wednesday 02 November 2016 03:50 PM, shana...@disroot.org wrote: > Does debian allow installation of multiple version of same npm module > via package manager ?. > > If not how will debian manage version conflicts like module a requires > module c@1 and module b requires c@2 ? We'll update

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#840170: some modules has package.yaml instead of package.json

Control: severity -1 important On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 11:32:47 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> wrote: > severity: grave > justification: breaks package build reducing severity to important, this does not have to block the release as it happens only in a few packages and whic

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#840170: Bug#840170: some modules has package.yaml instead of package.json

On Monday 31 October 2016 03:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> reducing severity to important, this does not have to block the release >> as it happens only in a few packages and which can easily be fixed. > > The tag is "severity", not "complexity": If the bug cause failure to > build packages

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] npm2deb_0.2.5-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On Saturday 29 October 2016 08:52 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > Accepted: Any idea why this is still stuck in NEW and not getting built? https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/npm2deb_0.2.5-3.html I see some other packages in NEW with similar issue where maintainer looks like "all Build

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-chalk on debian - possible mistake?

On 2016, നവംബർ 3 8:44:12 AM IST, Lucas Castro wrote: >I was looking at node-chalk that's already is in Debian. > >But it's not all its build dependences in debian. Some of them are optional, used only for code coverage, linting etc. We are mostly interested in running

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] how to address node-lodash 841698

On Wednesday 02 November 2016 04:11 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Fine, can you review what I have done so far and if it's OK sponsor it ? > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-lodash.git/log/?h=debian/master-2.4 I have uploaded it even though there are other possible improvements

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#840929: failed to create proper watch file even though homepage is set in package.json and tags are present

On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:03:35 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:36:16 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> > wrote: > > > > node module where this happened: repeat-string > > > Also failed for > https://github.

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-livescript_1.5.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 2016, ഒക്‌ടോബർ 13 11:30:08 PM IST, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > >Hi, > >according to LICENSE copyright holder for "File: *" are three people. >So >better put them instead the entry from package.json into your >debian/copyright. Done. >Thanks! > Thorsten >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#840207: dependency formats are not converted

On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 20:36:06 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> wrote: > ^1.1.0 and similar should be converted to debian format like >= 1.1.0 node-formatio uses >= 1.x for samsam dependency, it should be converted to 1.0 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital si

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#840929: this was caused when tag missed prefix v

https://github.com/jonschlinkert/to-regex-range also got the same issue. its has tags like 0.2.0 instead of v0.2.0. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#840967: use npm dist tarballs when repo does not have any tags

package: npm2deb version: 0.2.5-1 severity: wishlist For example, if you take the module level, npm view level dist.tarball https://registry.npmjs.org/level/-/level-1.4.0.tgz We can take this tarball and information on https://registry.npmjs.org/level/ to look for newer versions. We will have

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#840913: lib/cli.js is installed as not executable

package: npm2deb version: 0.2.5-1 sverity: important jison and other cli programs have this issue. Execution permission for /usr/lib/nodejs/jison/lib/cli.js gets stripped and a symlink to this file from /usr/bin is not sufficient. /usr/lib/nodejs/bin/mocha seems to be retains its execution

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#840929: failed to create proper watch file even though homepage is set in package.json and tags are present

package: npm2deb version: 0.2.5-1 node module where this happened: repeat-string signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836182: this seems like a local configuration issue

On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 21:28:54 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:35:15 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> > wrote: > > We cannot reproduce it on other machines. Local machine is dist-upgraded > > today in sid, but the issu

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#840922: npm2deb search should convert node module name to debian package name format when looking for debian packages

package: npm2deb version: 0.2.5-1 severity: important '_' should be converted to '-' and capital letters should be converted to small letters. $ npm2deb search string_decoder Looking for similiar package: None Looking for existing repositories: pkg-javascript/node-string-decoder --

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836182: this seems like a local configuration issue

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:35:15 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> wrote: > We cannot reproduce it on other machines. Local machine is dist-upgraded > today in sid, but the issue remains. > I figured out the issue, it can find existing packages only if deb-src line is present

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-yargs_6.4.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

On Saturday 26 November 2016 06:18 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:node-yargs is NEW. > binary:node-yargs is NEW. > source:node-yargs is NEW. > > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action > from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency

Control: tags -1 pending On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:24:44 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I can understand how might have seen the clues as being "right around > the corner". yargs is in NEW and we can upload a new version once it is accepted. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] testing during build is useless now with autopkgtests

On Saturday 26 November 2016 11:23 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Side question - Do you know why we're not there yet ? I guess its because autopkgtest is new service and we don't want to disrupt this release with more rc bugs. It may change in next release cycle and autopkgtest failure can be rc. >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency

On ചൊവ്വ 29 നവംബര്‍ 2016 01:45 വൈകു, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> My laptop slows to a crawl just before that failure, so I suspect it is >> eating up all memory, and I am not in the mood for disabling timeout as >> it seems mocha can do. Any ideas? Did you succeed a build, Praveen? Yes, I got

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] jqueryui_1.12.1+dfsg-3_amd64.changes is NEW

On വ്യാഴം 08 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:35 വൈകു, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:node-jquery-ui is NEW. > binary:node-jquery-ui is NEW. > > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action > from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good > OpenPGP

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] help with node-grunt-contrib-requirejs

[adding debian-ruby and #847353] On വ്യാഴം 08 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 10:34 രാവിലെ, Pirate Praveen wrote: > I think you are only checking for jquery-ui.js and not all the other files > like jquery-ui/widgets/datepicker.js > > I did not see any error in gitlab when using the embedded copy

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-loose-envify 1.3.0

On ശനി 10 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:55 രാവിലെ, Paolo Greppi wrote: > BTW Pirate, what do you mean with "If you get it working, may be add it > to a wiki page." ? Document steps to create a dfsg version in wiki,debian.org so we can just link to it when someone else asks the same question. signature.asc

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

On ശനി 10 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 12:10 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > node-bl has been updated so node-tar-stream should be OK now ! You should commit tarballs with this name node-tar-stream_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz (you committed node-tar-stream-1.5.2.tar.gz). I have fixed it and uploaded, please remember this

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-loose-envify 1.3.0

On ശനി 10 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:56 രാവിലെ, Paolo Greppi wrote: > BTW2, can you elaborate on the difference between ~dfsg and +dfsg ? x.y~dfsg < x.y < x.y+dfsg So if you use ~dfsg for your package, when a dependency on this package is specified, it has to be >= x.y~ as opposed to commonly used >= x.y

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-grunt-contrib-requirejs_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On ശനി 10 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:30 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote: > > > "Copyright: 2016 Grunt Team" but some individual contributors named (eg. Tyler > Keller). Please recheck the entire package. Fixed. > -- Chris Lamb Sat, 10 Dec 2016 08:32:59 + > > > > === > > Please feel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-loose-envify 1.3.0

On ശനി 10 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:55 രാവിലെ, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi this one should be ready, please review & upload. Uploaded, thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lodash-packages_4.15.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On ശനി 10 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:30 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Looks like missing attribution from jQuery (stopped checking there) > Fixed. Noticed this just after upload, tried dcut rm, but it had already moved to NEW. Can you review jquery-ui before my other packages in NEW? I need it to fix rc

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-bl_1.1.2-1_amd64.changes

On വെള്ളി 09 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 01:29 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Nothing ! > My key has expired, i renewed it as explained here: > https://keyring.debian.org/ > but it's not updated immediately by "ftp masters" - i don't think it has to > be available in the debian-keyring package to work again, but

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lodash-packages_4.15.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On ഞായര്‍ 11 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:13 രാവിലെ, Chris Lamb wrote: > Pirate Praveen wrote: > >> Can you review jquery-ui before my other packages in NEW? I need it to >> fix rc bug in gitlab. These other packages have less priority compared >> to jqueryui. > > Did y

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] jqueryui_1.12.1+dfsg-3_amd64.changes is NEW

On വ്യാഴം 08 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:22 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Please review this so I can fix RC bug of gitlab (via #847353). This is blocking a security update of gitlab (work is already done in git to use ruby-jquery-ui 6.0.1 which now build depend on node-jquery-ui). It would be extra w

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#845227: generate sub modules like lodash.isplainobject

On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:19:05 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> wrote: > Some dependencies for gulp [1] declare dependencies like > lodash.assignwith which current lodash package is not providing. Just uploaded node-lodash-packages which includes all per method modules s

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#845227: generate sub modules like lodash.isplainobject

[adding -devel] On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 00:53:05 -0800 John-David Dalton wrote: > It looks like you've ended up publishing all 407 individual packages as a > single package 😕 > They were individual to allow folks to cherry-pick individual packages at > their desired

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] new uglifyjs package ready for release (but failing for me)

On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 9 7:31:47 PM IST, "Jérémy Lal" wrote: >Sure ! I'm just waiting for the monthly HKP keyring push, >which should happen in the next three days if keyring repository >maintainer isn't busy. >Anyone feel free to do it before. > >Jérémy > I had uploaded 2.7.4 on

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] new uglifyjs package ready for release (but failing for me)

On വെള്ളി 09 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 07:45 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > I had uploaded 2.7.4 on Dec 1 and it is now in testing. > Sorry about the confusion. I thought you missed my last upload. I have uploaded 2.7.5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel m

[Pkg-javascript-devel] help with node-shelljs tests

Hi, shelljs is required for enabling tests of grunt. I have disabled 'shjs' tests now (see disable-failing-tests.patch). Can someone see if we can fix it? 'cd' tests are failing in sbuild because sbuild user home directory is /sbuild-nonexistent. Also chmod and ls tests that pass during build in

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#845227: Bug#845227: generate sub modules like lodash.isplainobject

On വെള്ളി 09 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:33 വൈകു, John-David Dalton wrote: >> That means we have to maintain multiple copies of the same library and > that increases our effort to maintain it. > > The maintenance cost is reduced since they're just bundled with the > package. You can treat each release of

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#845227: Bug#845227: generate sub modules like lodash.isplainobject

On വെള്ളി 09 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 09:47 വൈകു, John-David Dalton wrote: >> So in debian we patch grunt to use globally installed modules and tasks. > > I'm OK with creating more hoops to jump through in this case. I think > the approach you've outlined is a bit wonky. There are ways to bundle > deps

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#847091: Bug#847091: update node-extend to latest upstream release

On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 14 2:16:46 PM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote: > >Assuming we want to keep node-xtend and node-extend separate, I have >prepared the update for this one in the alioth repo. > >That's because also node-liftoff (which is my ITP pipeline after >node-fixed) depends

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#847091: Bug#847091: Bug#847091: update node-extend to latest upstream release

On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 14 2:16:46 PM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote: >That's because also node-liftoff (which is my ITP pipeline after >node-fixed) depends on node-extend >= 3.0.0 > I think easier option would be to see if liftoff tests pass with node-extend 2.0 and relax

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-has-cors 1.1.0

On വ്യാഴം 15 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 07:57 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, > > I packaged node-has-cors as per this ITP: > https://bugs.debian.org/848241 > > The repo is here: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-has-cors.git > > Please someone more experienced than me review it and if

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-node-uid-safe 2.1.3

On വ്യാഴം 15 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 06:43 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > baah it's node-uid-safe, trust me ! Uploaded, thanks signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-loose-envify 1.3.0

On ശനി 10 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 07:43 വൈകു, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I generally use ~ because upstream may re-release _same_ version but > with DFSG-violating pieces stripped. Arguably that is dificult to do at > github but that is besides the point. It is not difficult in github, you just have to

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-roadrunner 1.1.0

On തിങ്കള്‍ 12 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:40 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi > > I packaged node-object-path as per this ITP: > https://bugs.debian.org/846218, this is the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-roadrunner.git/ > > Please someone more experienced than me review it and if

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-object-path 0.11.3

On തിങ്കള്‍ 12 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 01:32 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi > > I packaged node-object-path as per this ITP: > https://bugs.debian.org/846215, this is the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-object-path.git > > Please someone more experienced than me review it and if

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-request-capture-har 1.1.4

On തിങ്കള്‍ 12 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:20 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi > > I packaged node-object-path as per this ITP: > https://bugs.debian.org/846217, this is the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-request-capture-har.git/ > > Please someone more experienced than me review

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-loose-envify 1.3.0

On തിങ്കള്‍ 12 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:47 രാവിലെ, Paolo Greppi wrote: > https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Repacking I think it does not have to be specific to Javascript, so it can be just https://wiki.debian.org/Repacking and link from https://wiki.debian.org/UscanEnhancements signature.asc

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#847789: Bug#847789: On the new problem

On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 13 7:13:24 PM IST, Julien Puydt wrote: >Hi, > >I found the time to compile the deps to check for myself, as it would >be >easier than having you report issues one by one, but I'm stuck with >node-glob-stream, which build-depends on node-extend (>=

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-path-root 0.1.1

On തിങ്കള്‍ 12 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 06:05 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > on that file and they all pass. If we manage to point debian/watch to > github, we can easily turn on tests. You can include the test as a patch. When they add tags (jonschlinkert is pretty quick to add tags), we can switch tarballs

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-deprecated

On ശനി 19 നവംബര്‍ 2016 06:43 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote: > - It's missing a (build, test) dependency on mocha. > - quote from autopkgtest doc: please use @builddeps sparingly, as this > can easily lead to missing binary > package dependencies being overlooked if they get pulled in via > build

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-parse-filepath 1.0.1

On ചൊവ്വ 13 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 10:57 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > My next one is node-fined. It's ready on alioth, I can test here if I > install node-parse-filepath and node-lodash-packages with dpkg -i (and > everything seems fine). > > I cant' test yet with pkg-ruby-extras/build because those are

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-parse-filepath 1.0.1

On ചൊവ്വ 13 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 10:01 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi > > I packaged node-parse-filepath as per this ITP: > https://bugs.debian.org/847911, this is the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-parse-filepath.git/ > > I patched away the dependency on is-absolute with

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#847302: allow creating multiple binaries from single repo

package: npm2deb severity: wishlist version: 0.2.6-1 Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/LeoIannacone/npm2deb/issues/46 Control: block 845227 by -1 Placeholder for upstream issue https://github.com/LeoIannacone/npm2deb/issues/46 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#845227: trying my JS skills

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/lodash/lodash/issues/2868 On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 12:41:12 +0100 Paolo Greppi wrote: > I am not sure what you want to achieve (and I ignore the intent of > upstream) It seems much simpler than I thought, they are maintaining these in

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#846961: Bug#846961: Bug#846961: recent update of libjs-jquery-ui broke gitlab

On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 7 1:11:14 AM IST, Paul Gevers wrote: >To be honest, I don't have a clue what ruby-jquery-ui-rails is doing >(never heard of the package before), so I can't answer that question >yet. One thing, the latest version of upstream ruby-jquery-ui-rails is >also

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#846961: Bug#846961: recent update of libjs-jquery-ui broke gitlab

On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 6 3:16:09 PM IST, Andrew Lee wrote: >I am packaging a complax package called Open Build Service. I also got >hitted by this. Seems a simple fix https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/7964/diffs You need to patch application.js to use new

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#847353: Bug#846961: recent update of libjs-jquery-ui broke gitlab

On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 17:12:12 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@debian.org> wrote: > I tested the patch, but that was not enough., I still get the same error :( I tested using embedded copy of jquery-ui in ruby-jquery-ui-rails and it is working. So it is not an upstream issue, but debian speci

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >