Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-base64-js

2017-02-02 Thread Siddhesh Rane
Hi Praveen,
I have uploaded the pristine-tar branch



On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Pirate Praveen
<prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
> On ബുധന്‍ 01 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 09:10 വൈകു, Siddhesh Rane wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I have packaged node module base64-js
>> (https://git.fosscommunity.in/SiddheshRane/node-base64-js) for ITP bug
>> #853853 (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853853)
>>
>> It is lintian clean and verified with pbuilder.
>>
>> I request sponsorship for this package
>>
>> Regards
>> Siddhesh Rane
>>
> Please commit the orig tar ball in pristine-tar branch (may be you
> forgot to add --pristine-tar to gbp import-dsc option). You can use
> pristine-tar commit to add the orig tarball.
>
> Remove the following line from changelog next time.
>
> * New upstream release
>
>
> --
> Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
> Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-ieee754

2017-01-31 Thread Siddhesh Rane
Hello all,
I have packaged node-ieee754
(https://git.fosscommunity.in/SiddheshRane/node-ieee754) for ITP bug
##853140 (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853140)

It is lintian clean (except a description-too-long warning which can
not be done away with without writing a useless description)

I request sponsorship for this package

Regards
Siddhesh Rane

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-minimalistic-assert

2017-02-06 Thread Siddhesh Rane
Hello,
I have packaged node-minimalistic-assert
(https://git.fosscommunity.in/SiddheshRane/node-minimalistic-assert) for ITP bug
#854116 (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854116)

It is lintian clean and verified with pbuilder.

I request sponsorship for this package

Regards

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-buffer

2017-02-06 Thread Siddhesh Rane
I have packaged node buffer and all its dependencies.
One of the dependencies is in new queue and another is waiting for sponsorship.
This package depends on both.

I have also discovered a false positive in lintian. For node-buffer
lintian gives a source is missing error because a line length is > 512
characters. Actually this line is an array of random integers that is
required for this library.
So I request you to investigate

The repo is availalable at https://git.fosscommunity.in/SiddheshRane/node-buffer

Regards
Siddhesh Rane

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-browser-resolve

2017-02-07 Thread Siddhesh Rane
Hello,
I have packaged node-browser-resolve which is a direct dependency for
browserify.
It is lintian clean and verified with pbuilder.


Code is hosted here
https://git.fosscommunity.in/SiddheshRane/node-browser-resolve

ITP bug #854445

Requesting sponsorship for this package

Regards
Siddhesh Rane

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-base64-js

2017-02-01 Thread Siddhesh Rane
Hello,
I have packaged node module base64-js
(https://git.fosscommunity.in/SiddheshRane/node-base64-js) for ITP bug
#853853 (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853853)

It is lintian clean and verified with pbuilder.

I request sponsorship for this package

Regards
Siddhesh Rane

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-has

2017-02-07 Thread Siddhesh Rane
Hello I have packaged node-has which is a dependency for browserify.
It is lintian clean and verified with pbuilder.

Code is available here (https://github.com/SiddheshRane/node-has)
ITP bug #854533

I request sponsorship for this package

Regards
Siddhesh Rane

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-cipher-base

2017-02-04 Thread Siddhesh Rane
Hello,
I have packaged node module node-cipher-base
(https://git.fosscommunity.in/SiddheshRane/node-cipher-base) for ITP bug
#854114 (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854114)

It is lintian clean and verified with pbuilder.

I request sponsorship for this package

Regards

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-base64-js

2017-02-04 Thread Siddhesh Rane
Hi Praveen,
I removed the line from changelog
As for pristine-tar I was confused between orig and dfsg_orig, because
the latter is actually a modification that I made (It doesnt contain
minified files) and hence is technically not 'pristine'. I did
pristine-tar commit again and pushed to gitlab. The pristine-tar
branch now contains files for both orig as well as the dfsg variant.
Should I keep both or remove the orig?
Regards
Siddhesh Rane

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
> On വെള്ളി 03 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 01:14 വൈകു, Siddhesh Rane wrote:
>> Hi Praveen,
>> I have uploaded the pristine-tar branch
>
> Filename is also important, you should commit
> node-base64-js_1.2.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz instead of node-base64-js-1.2.0.tar.gz
>
> Also please remove "New Upstream release" line from changelog.
>
>
>
> --
> Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
> Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-bn.js -- big numbers in pure javascript

2017-02-08 Thread Siddhesh Rane
node-bn.js is a node module I have packaged. It is a dependency for browserify.
It is lintian clean and dependencies verified with pbuilder. I have
also run dpkg -i

Code uploaded to alioth (git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-javascript/node-bn.js.git)
ITP bug #854570 (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854570)

I request sponsorship for this package
Regards
Siddhesh Rane

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-ci-info

2017-01-06 Thread Siddhesh Rane
Hello,
I have packaged node-ci-info (
https://git.fosscommunity.in/SiddheshRane/ci-info/) for ITP #850125 (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850125).
Its lintian clean and verified with sbuild.

Regards
Siddhesh Rane
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-ci-info

2017-01-06 Thread Siddhesh Rane
Hello,
I have packaged node-ci-info (https://git.fosscommunity.in/
SiddheshRane/ci-info/) for ITP #850125 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850125).
Its lintian clean and verified with sbuild.

Regards
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-ci-info

2017-01-07 Thread Siddhesh Rane
Hi,
I have pushed all 3 branches upstream, fixed original author's
copyright date as in LICENSE file, and added a long description.
Please checkout the git repo again
(https://git.fosscommunity.in/SiddheshRane/ci-info)

Regards
Siddhesh Rane

On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Sruthi Chandran <s...@disroot.org> wrote:
>
> On 01/06/2017 02:30 PM, Siddhesh Rane wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have packaged node-ci-info 
> (https://git.fosscommunity.in/SiddheshRane/ci-info/) for ITP #850125 
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850125).
> Its lintian clean and verified with sbuild.
>
> Please push all three branches with git push --all.
> Add long description in control.
> Correct the year in copyright file according to the LICENSE file.

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel