[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#898107: Please build browserified

package: node-source-map-support version: 0.5.2+ds-1 seveiry: wishlist A remainder to build browserified package whe browserify land in unstable Bastien -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#890539: RFS: node-yamljs/0.3.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Moog <andreas.m...@warperbbs.de> wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 09:20:40PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Thanks for the review. I have a couple of questions about some of the points: > >> 1. you need a smoke test : aka run

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#890539: RFS: node-yamljs/0.3.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]

first mail incomplete complete On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Moog <andreas.m...@warperbbs.de> > wrote: >> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 09:20:40PM +0200, Bastien ROUCA

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#887586: Fixed

control: affects -1 - src:node-connect On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: > control: affects -1 - src:node-cookie-parser -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.ne

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#887586: Fixed

control: affects -1 - src:node-connect-timeout On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: > control: affects -1 - src:node-connect > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES > <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#887586: Fixed

control: affects -1 - src:node-vhost -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-normalize.css_7.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Reuploaded. Thanks On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 12:00 AM, Thorsten Alteholz <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote: > > > From: Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> > > >Hi, > >Could you please reject this package. > >Test.html have a

[Pkg-javascript-devel] [REVIEW] please reject node-normalize.css

Hi, Could you please reject this package. Test.html have a copyright that is not documented. I will sponsor a new pacakge. It will depends for privacy reason on /node-html5shiv that I will also upload Bastien -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#897536: Bug#897536: mustache.js: FTBFS: make[1]: rake: Command not found

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Jonas Meurer wrote: > Control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > Hello, > > I just tried to reproduce the FTBFS and failed. rake is defined as > build-dependency and correctly pulled in according to linked the build logs. > > My best guess is that rake

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#887586: Fixed

control: affects -1 - src:node-cookie-parser -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#887586: workarround

control: tags -1 + patch problematic package should be updated or use mocha --exit -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] New version of node-tape breaks autopkgtests of node-sha.js in testing

If you have an idea why it fail. Locally I run it 10 000 and I could not reproduce Bastien On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hmm, a retry was already triggered. It was already picked up in the last > run. You can ignore this e-mail. > > Paul > > On

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] How to ship DefinitelyTyped's type definitions?

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:31 AM, Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote: > > > On May 17, 2018 1:32:01 AM GMT+05:30, Julien Puydt <julien.pu...@laposte.net> > wrote: >>Hi, >> >>Le 16/05/2018 à 17:45, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : >>>

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] How to ship DefinitelyTyped's type definitions?

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:26 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: > Hi, > > as you may know, more and more JS projects incorporate some TypeScript > these days. This requires some definitions because the typing is > stronger, so we have: > (1) projects adding typing for what they

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Is any help needed with updates?

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Zebulon McCorkle wrote: > Does the JavaScript team need any help with package updating? I would be > more than happy to help out updating some packages, though I would need > a sponsor to upload. Yes see here. Begin with package with CI

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#900032: Bug#900032: mocha: missing-copyright-file /usr/share/doc/mocha/copyright

Hi, I am really clueless. You are right but it will do this only with upgrade. I have used correctly dpkg-maintscript-helper. Could you crosscheck, my script ? Bastien On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:58 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Package: mocha > Version: 4.1.0+ds1-1 > Severity:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#898857: Another solution for env problem

hi, Another and better solution will be to create a debhelper wrapper and push for debhelper 12. It will replace /usr/bin/env node by /usr/bin/node, or other env It is better because it avoid code duplication. Any volontuer ? -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#899032: Run testsuite

package: node-dargs version: 5.1.0-1 severity: wishlist need ava not packaged but we must run testsuite -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Browserify and webpack concern and help needed

Hi, javascript package are often browserified or webpacked. Webpack or browserify takes modules with dependencies and generates static assets representing those modules. In fact it is a static linking of dependency in one js files. So the problem is: - every time a module change on the depends

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#901474: Bug#901474: Bug#901474: Bug#901474: [nodejs][RFC] Multiarch and /usr/local search path

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:42 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > 2018-06-13 23:28 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES : >> >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> > >> > >> > 2018-06-13 22:09 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIÈS >> > :

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#901474: Bug#901474: Bug#901474: [nodejs][RFC] Multiarch and /usr/local search path

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > 2018-06-13 22:09 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIÈS : >> >> Package: nodejs >> Version: 10.4.0~dfsg-2 >> Severity: important >> tags: patch >> >> >> Hi, >> >> In order to get search path in multiarch path and in /usr/local I use the >> following

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Help with a RC bug in one of my package

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Bastien, > >> I found a bug and pushed it due to build profile but the empty doc is strange > > I am not sure why I've been contacted on this bug, nor why it was not > additionally CC'd to #900032 as I think it should be.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Help with a RC bug in one of my package

Hi, I am clueless about #900032 ... I found a bug and pushed it due to build profile but the empty doc is strange It will be empty only on upgrade (install will create the symlink). I use dpkg-maintscript-helper so normally dir to symlink should work Bastien -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#900032: Bug#900032: Bug#900032: mocha: missing-copyright-file /usr/share/doc/mocha/copyright

Found close On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Andreas Moog > wrote: >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:40:48PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am really clueless. You are righ

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#900032: Bug#900032: Bug#900032: mocha: missing-copyright-file /usr/share/doc/mocha/copyright

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Andreas Moog wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:40:48PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am really clueless. You are right but it will do this only with upgrade. >> >> I have used correctly dpkg-maintscript-helpe

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] New lintian warnings helping to detect FTBFS and license violation

On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Bastien and others, > > On Sat, Jun 02 2018, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: > >> It will first detect minified javascript/css embedded in html file >> (source only). It it possible to avoid this warning by creating a >> symlink >> to source

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Multiarch and FHS violation for node

Hi, Node install module under /usr/lib/nodejs even if it is arch all. Could be possible for next node version, to add another search path for NODE_PATH under /usr/share/nodejs that will be tested before /usr/lib/nodejs I plan to add a lintian warning if we get a consensus Bastien --

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#900959: [node-nodeunit] Provide a browserified version

Package: node-nodeunit Version: 0.11.2+ds3-1 Severity: wishlist control: block -1 by 780357 Provide a browserify version please. browserify -s nodeunit browser.js will do the trick -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] How to ship DefinitelyTyped's type definitions?

On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On June 23, 2018 8:32:22 PM GMT+05:30, Bastien ROUCARIES > wrote: >>On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:06 AM, Pirate Praveen >> wrote: >>> >>> Can't this be node-types-foo? Then it follows the exis

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] How to ship DefinitelyTyped's type definitions?

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:06 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Saturday 19 May 2018 08:08 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:31 AM, Pirate Praveen >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On May 17, 2018 1:32:01 AM GMT+05:30, Julien Puydt >>&g

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] nodejs: /usr/local on default global module paths ?

Hi, On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Hi, > > bug #901474 asks the question of wether having nodejs load > modules found inside /usr/local (share for pure js, lib for addons) > is something to be expected by default or not. > > Anyone can already set NODE_PATH env variable,

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#901474: Any news ?

Hi,* Could be possible to merge this patch ? Thnkas -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Browserified copy and DFSG

Hi, They are a few package that FTBFS due to lack of browserify under debian [1] The most significant point is to render javadoc FTBFS due to lack of browserified version of pako a port of zlib to javascript. I plan to upload browserify soon but browserify is blocked by: *

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] How to ship DefinitelyTyped's type definitions?

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Zebulon McCorkle wrote: > On Saturday, June 23, 2018 11:21:29 AM EDT Pirate Praveen wrote: >> Is there any module that starts with types-? > > Just searched for types- in the npm registry, nothing seems to start with it. > > [~] npm search types- > NAME

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Shipping DefinitelyTyped definitions : one binary package per definition?

Le jeu. 9 août 2018 à 22:11, Julien Puydt a écrit : > Hi, > > Le 09/08/2018 à 09:19, Julien Puydt a écrit : > > Le 08/08/2018 à 23:35, Julien Puydt a écrit : > >> I'm not convinced it's the best way to handle the situation, but here > >> is a simple script I wrote to toy with the idea... > >> >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Browserified copy and DFSG

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:43 AM Niels Thykier wrote: > > Bastien ROUCARIES: > > Hi, > > > > They are a few package that FTBFS due to lack of browserify under debian [1] > > > > The most significant point is to render javadoc FTBFS due to lack of > > b

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node packages in NEW

n Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:29 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > > 2018-09-05 23:14 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES : >> >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES >> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node packages in NEW

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in > NEW. Does Debian really need all those packages? > > node packages are rather small and often consist only of a few lines of > code. From my

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node packages in NEW

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in > > NEW. Does Debian really need all t

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node packages in NEW

On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:17 PM Xavier wrote: > > Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a écrit : > > Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Thorsten Alteholz > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Bastien, &

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node packages in NEW

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Xavier wrote: > > Le 05/09/2018 à 23:14, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES > > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz > >> wrote: > &g

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Browserified copy and DFSG

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 1:27 AM Sean Whitton wrote: > > Hello, > > On Mon 10 Sep 2018 at 11:00AM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > > I actually implemented something like this for Go in Ubuntu when we were > > looking at building Go shared libraries but we gave up on that whole > > approach

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node packages in NEW

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 7:33 AM Xavier wrote: > > Le 09/09/2018 à 23:36, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:17 PM Xavier wrote: > >> > >> Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a écrit : > >>> Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCARIES a écr

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Browserified copy and DFSG

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:41 PM Sean Whitton wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed 05 Sep 2018 at 04:38PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > >> AFAIUI, Built-Using is solely to be used for compliance with licenses > >> (GPL or GPL-like licenses). Are these node mod

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node packages in NEW

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi Bastien, > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > >> - put together packages that belong together; I am not sure here, but > >> wouldn't it be fine to have just one package node-d3 or nod

[Pkg-javascript-devel] babel-preset-env error that does not allow to test package

Hi, I am stuck since two days to an error between mocha and babel-preset-error. I have just pushed an experimental branch to babel-preset-env showing the error. /usr/lib/nodejs/babel-core/lib/transformation/file/options/option-manager.js:328 throw e; ^ Error: Options

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] GroupSourcesTutorial page to review

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:03 AM Xavier wrote: > > Le 13/09/2018 à 11:16, Xavier a écrit : > > Le 11/09/2018 à 19:48, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > >> > >> On 9/11/18 10:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > >>> Hi Xavier, > >>> > >>> The example in Provides section should be written > >>> Provides: node-ta,

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] GroupSourcesTutorial page to review

I really need it for next ckeditor (40 small packages) and acorn. For uscan I do not think the alpha sort is worthwhile. Let version be in watch file order. Bastien On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 5:18 PM Xavier wrote: > > Le 20/10/2018 à 16:47, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > On Thu,

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] GroupSourcesTutorial page to review

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:34 PM Xavier wrote: > > Le 22/10/2018 à 11:23, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > I really need it for next ckeditor (40 small packages) and acorn. > > > > For uscan I do not think the alpha sort is worthwhile. Let version be > > in watc

[Pkg-javascript-devel] acorn status

Hi, I have grouped some small package for acorn, see salsa But i could not progress due to dynamic-import failling test Do you have idea ? Bastien -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#911365: Bug#911365: New upstream is out

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:54 AM Julien Puydt wrote: > > Package: node-acorn-dynamic-import > Version: 3.0.0-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > I need a more recent version of this package to update the node-buble > package. Need to be merged with node-acorn work on it (avoid a circular ref)

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] acorn status

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 1:55 PM Xavier wrote: > > Le 22/10/2018 à 13:52, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I have grouped some small package for acorn, see salsa > > > > But i could not progress due to dynamic-import failling test > &

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] acorn status

Ok, thanks. The main bug is why test fail On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 9:08 PM Xavier wrote: > > Le 22/10/2018 à 15:23, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 1:55 PM Xavier wrote: > >> > >> Le 22/10/2018 à 13:52, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > >&g

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#911367: Bug#911367: New upstream is out

Will take On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:21 AM Julien Puydt wrote: > > Package: node-acorn > Version: 5.5.3+ds3-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > I need a more recent version of this package to update the node-buble > package. > > Thanks, > > jpuydt on irc.debian.org > > -- > Pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] GroupSourcesTutorial page to review

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:29 PM Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:03 AM Xavier wrote: > > > > Le 13/09/2018 à 11:16, Xavier a écrit : > > > Le 11/09/2018 à 19:48, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > >> > > >> On 9/

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#911367: Bug#911367: New upstream is out

Note that it will need a hug testing due to change of API for plugins. On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 4:40 PM Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Will take > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:21 AM Julien Puydt > wrote: > > > > Package: node-acorn > > Version: 5.5.3+ds3-1 >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] acorn status

Hi, I have resolve the problem. Thank for your help On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 10:43 PM Xavier wrote: > > Le 22/10/2018 à 21:21, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Ok, thanks. > > Last bug fixed, you missed a filenamemangle. > > Now uscan downloads the 3 components + main pa

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] babel 6 -> 7 transition - call for help

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:36 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > Hi team, > > Webpack 3 -> 4 update was requested recently which needs babel 7. In > addition to it, esm needs (which will allow us to skip rollup for ES > modules to help fix many circular dependencies) babel 7, gitlab also > needs babel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFC: javascript bundle of small packages

Hi, I have just pushed a new version of acorn and associated small package to salsa (https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/acorn) It group small package using dpkg module and for now fakeupstream redirector. We plan to modify uscan (yadd?) in order to get this feature upstream. We also plan to

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFC: javascript bundle of small packages

Hi all, > > Dear ftpmaster could you review before I upload to experimental, > > particularly breaks/replace line. The WIP acorn package uploaded to experimental is a tentative to group small node package. The goal is to use uscan to download a few (<=10 packages) in a debbundle package. Xadd

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] New javascript packages for taliesin

On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 5:15 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > On 2018, നവംബർ 11 7:13:47 PM IST, Nicolas Mora wrote: > >Hello, > > > >I'm working on packaging Taliesin, an audio streaming server with a > >front-end written in react [1]. > > Welcome to javascript team. > > >To build the

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] New javascript packages for taliesin

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 3:09 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > On 2018, നവംബർ 14 7:23:24 PM IST, Nicolas Mora wrote: > >Le 2018-11-14 05:43, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > >Also, I just realized that the script jest/bin/jest.js contains this > >simple code: > > > >require('jest-cli/bin/jest'); > > >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#876618: Bug#876618: science.js build-depends on removed nodejs-legacy

Il Le ven. 28 sept. 2018 à 07:27, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit : > Control: tags -1 + help upstream confirmed > > [Jérémy Lal] > > Depending on nodejs-legacy was a serious bug in the first place. > > Anyway (nodejs >= 6.11.2~) installs /usr/bin/node now. > > I had a look at this, and do not know

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Re: Shipping DefinitelyTyped definitions : one binary package per definition?

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:43 AM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On 9/24/18 2:09 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > >> I think it is over engineering and making things unnecessarily complex. > >> This can be a fallback option if a separate version of type definition i

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Re: Shipping DefinitelyTyped definitions : one binary package per definition?

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:25 AM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 23 8:26:25 PM IST, Bastien ROUCARIES > wrote: > >types node should go to parent package. i means node-types-acorn > >should go to package node-acorn using fakeuptstream multiple t

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Re: Shipping DefinitelyTyped definitions : one binary package per definition?

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 12:24 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 24 2:28:00 PM IST, Bastien ROUCARIES > wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:43 AM Pirate Praveen > > wrote: > >> > >> On 9/24/18 2:09 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Shipping DefinitelyTyped definitions : one binary package per definition?

Le sam. 22 sept. 2018 à 11:36, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > On 8/10/18 2:58 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > > > - just one node-types-definitelytyped real package would provide all > > necessary node-types-foo ones, so if a package needs the @types/foo, > it &g

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] acorn porting to es5

gernaut451-guest/acorn/tree/es5 >> It's basically the same acorn version only import/export statement have >> changed also added some try/catch. As then we would not need rollup. >> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 6:14 PM Bastien ROUCARIES >> wrote: >>> >&

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] status of acorn git repo - build is failing

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:53 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > Hi, > > Can someone confirm if you can build acorn from git repo? I tried master > and debian/5.5.3+ds3-1 both failed. Did you see it is a multiple tar ? BTW it should be ported to https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/GroupSourcesTutorial

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Re: Shipping DefinitelyTyped definitions : one binary package per definition?

On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 4:44 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On 9/23/18 5:13 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: > > What do you think of the attached script? It assumes the upstream > > DefinitelyTyped tree is in "DefinitelyTyped.upstream" as it's the layout > > I use for my experiment, and generates a

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Shipping DefinitelyTyped definitions : one binary package per definition?

On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 4:38 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On 9/22/18 5:17 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > No because it is source included. How do you take care of version hell > > If a package needs a different version of type definition that shipped > in node-typescr

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] acorn porting to es5

I am working on acorn, it is not easy. Will try to push something today On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 1:29 PM ashutosh singh wrote: > > > Hello > > I am porting acorn to es5 as currently it's using rollup to convert from es6 > to es5. As next step would be compiling bluebird with this es5 version. I

[Pkg-javascript-devel] nodejs V10: buffer problem

Hi, I believe we will have a huge problem https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/node-bn.js/1624829/log.gz -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] nodejs V10: buffer problem

On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 4:25 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > >> Le mar. 1 janv. 2019 à 15:35, Bastien ROUCARIES >> a écrit : >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I believe we will have a huge problem >>> >>> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/t

[Pkg-javascript-devel] browserify last depends : test fail

Hi, Could I get help in order to know why test fail ? Repo is here: g...@salsa.debian.org:js-team/node-insert-module-globals.git https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-insert-module-globals This is the last depends of the most needed browserify, so I will like to get this before freeze in order

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] components without major risks

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:33 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Xavier (2018-11-27 15:22:10) > > Le 27/11/2018 à 15:03, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > > Quoting Xavier (2018-11-27 14:00:42) > > >> Le 27/11/2018 à 11:55, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > >>> Hi Xavier and Paolo, > > >>> > > >>>

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] components without major risks

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:45 PM Xavier wrote: > > Le 27/11/2018 à 15:33, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > Quoting Xavier (2018-11-27 15:22:10) > >> Le 27/11/2018 à 15:03, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > >>> Quoting Xavier (2018-11-27 14:00:42) > Le 27/11/2018 à 11:55, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] script to generate debian/watch for embedding nodejs modules

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:00 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On 11/26/18 8:25 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: > > The file names are crazy ! is this the way the Debian JavaScript > > Maintainers team wants to go ? > > If you are brave, generate the debian/watch for npm and try running uscan > > on it ...

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] script to generate debian/watch for embedding nodejs modules

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:58 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > > Le lun. 26 nov. 2018 à 17:29, Xavier a écrit : >> >> Xavier wrote: >> >> ... >> >> Looks acceptable IMO >> > >> > Policy update: >> > - components used only during build => not used in version >> >(except if they inject some code) >>

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] GroupSourcesTutorial page to review

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 7:16 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > Hi Xavier, > > The example in Provides section should be written > Provides: node-ta, node-tb > ? Provides MUST be versionned in order to get smooth upgrade if we split. Bastien > > > 2018-09-10 23:34 GMT+02:00 Xavier : >> >> Dear fellow

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RC bugs

Le lun. 18 févr. 2019 à 19:17, Xavier a écrit : > Le 18/02/2019 à 17:46, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:50 PM, Xavier wrote: > >> - node-mocha: #921798: FTBFS (Module not found: Error: Recursion in > >>resolving) > > > > I tried to use rollup instead of

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#931179: Bug#931179: acorn 6.1.1 please bundle additional plugins needed by nodejs source

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:12 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > Source: acorn > Severity: wishlist > > https://github.com/nodejs/node/tree/master/deps/acorn-plugins > shows which ones. > > Thanks for considering - i wonder if some of them would rather be > packaged independently or not. Will do but I need

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Components quality plan

Acorn was uploaded today with dak rejection... So maybe changes our plan ? On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 10:30 PM Xavier wrote: > > Le 01/09/2019 à 12:26, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:44 PM, Xavier wrote: > >> Hi all, To increase embedding quality and security, I

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#940648: Do not install bench dir

Package: pkg-js-tools Version: 0.9.10 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Bench like test should not be installed -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding acorn_6.1.1+ds+~0.3.1+~4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.6.2+ds-1_amd64.changes

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 2:22 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 5 5:42:17 PM IST, roucaries bastien > wrote: > >In > >On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:26 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > >> > >> Dear Jonas et al., > >> > >> > What would you suggest/expect as more useful alternative - given > >the

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] nodejs_12.7.0~dfsg-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 8:09 PM Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > > Accepted: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Format: 1.8 > Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 19:48:03 +0200 > Source: nodejs > Architecture: source > Version: 12.7.0~dfsg-1 > Distribution: experimental > Urgency: medium

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Remove unmaintained package

Hi, Could we keep diffie-helmann until browserify in unstable ? Le jeu. 8 août 2019 à 09:31, Xavier a écrit : > > Le 08/08/2019 à 08:09, Xavier a écrit : > > Le 08/08/2019 à 07:24, Xavier a écrit : > >> Le 08/08/2019 à 07:11, Xavier a écrit : > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> looking at UDD, we have a some

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Remove unmaintained package

idem node-shell-quote needed by browserify. On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 6:25 PM Xavier wrote: > > Le 08/08/2019 à 09:31, Xavier a écrit : > > Le 08/08/2019 à 08:09, Xavier a écrit : > >> Le 08/08/2019 à 07:24, Xavier a écrit : > >>> Le 08/08/2019 à 07:11, Xavier a écrit : > Hi, > >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] The way to update rollup

Going back after some time out On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:03 PM Xavier wrote: > > My first results: > > 0.50.0 can build until 0.53.3 > 0.51.7 can build until 0.56.3 > 0.56.1 can build until 0.65.2 > 0.58.1 can build until 0.67.0 at least We need to go by step. Waiting to go to testing then

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] rollup circular dependencies

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:21 AM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:18, Pirate Praveen > wrote: > > node-immutable is accepted, so we can upload 0.52 now > > > rollup 0.52 is uploaded to unstable, all reverse rebuilds succeeded except > node-mocha (which was already

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#930268: forwarded

control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/33661 -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-acorn-dynamic-import_4.0.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:54 AM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > On 2019, ജൂലൈ 10 3:12:37 PM IST, Pirate Praveen > wrote: > >This upload broke node-webpack and node-buble and that means a large > >number of packages now FTBFS. > > > > I think we should revert node-acorn-dynamic-import to

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#952312: Bug#952312: Bug#952312: Bug#952312: node-eslint-scope: FTBFS: tests failed

Le mar. 25 févr. 2020 à 19:48, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > control: reassign -1 node-espree > control: affects -1 node-eslint-scope > > Quoting Xavier (2020-02-25 18:29:35) > > Le 23/02/2020 à 14:50, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Rollup in Debian

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:41 AM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > On ഞാ, Jan 5, 2020 at 22:16, Pirate Praveen > wrote: > > It needs acorn 6 and only webpack 4.30 is compatible with acorn 6. To > > upload webpack 4.30 to unstable we need node-webassemblyjs. > > node-webassemblyjs needs either nodejs

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-typescript-types should die

Hi, This package should die. With newer pkg-js-tools we must embded the types is not supplied by the main package as a compoent of the main package. I was burned because acorn now supply a type. It is better to do the work in the main package than in a meta package -- Pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Rollup in Debian

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:26 PM Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:41 AM Pirate Praveen > wrote: > > > > > > > > On ഞാ, Jan 5, 2020 at 22:16, Pirate Praveen > > wrote: > > > It needs acorn 6 and only webpack 4.30 is compa

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-typescript-types should die

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 5:43 AM Xavier wrote: > > Le 24/02/2020 à 23:28, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > This package should die. > > With newer pkg-js-tools we must embded the types is not supplied by > > the main package as a compoent of th

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-typescript-types should die

On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 4:53 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2020-03-01 16:26:23) > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 5:43 AM Xavier wrote: > > > > > > Le 24/02/2020 à 23:28, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > &

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] babel7 in a separate package ?

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Pirate Praveen (2020-02-25 10:59:11) > > On 2020, ഫെബ്രുവരി 25 10:59:35 AM IST, Xavier wrote: > > >I think we should publish babel7 in a separate node-babel7: some > > >package require old babel 6 for build. OK? > > > > > > >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-typescript-types should die

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 6:24 PM Xavier wrote: > > Le 02/03/2020 à 00:15, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 4:53 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> > >> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2020-03-01 16:26:23) > >>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 5:4

  1   2   >