Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFH: puppeteer tests

2022-01-14 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le ven. 14 janv. 2022 à 09:41, Yadd a écrit : > On 14/01/2022 08:09, Andrius Merkys wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Martina and I have been working on packaging puppeteer, an API to > > control Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. Martina got the package > > building on sbuild, but we are stuck with test

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1004419: nodejs:any prevents one to install nodejs package from official upstream "nodesource" repo

2022-01-27 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: nodejs Version: 12.22.7~dfsg-2 Severity: normal Sometimes it's useful to be able to swap between nodejs debian package and somewhat "official" https://deb.nodesource.com releases. Now that packages depend on nodejs:any, it's no longer possible to do that, at least not without uninstallin

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1004419: Bug#1004419: nodejs:any prevents one to install nodejs package from official upstream "nodesource" repo

2022-01-27 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le jeu. 27 janv. 2022 à 10:45, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2022-01-27 10:24:21) > > Sometimes it's useful to be able to swap between nodejs debian package > > and somewhat "official" https://deb.nodesource.com releases. > > > > Now t

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1004479: node-js-yaml: Please build and install dist/js-yaml.mjs

2022-01-28 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: node-js-yaml Version: 4.1.0+dfsg+~4.0.5-5 Severity: normal Hi, import * as Yaml from 'js-yaml'; fails because "exports": { ".": { "import": "./dist/js-yaml.mjs", "require": "./index.js" }, "./package.json": "./package.json" }, and dist/js-yaml.mjs is missing.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1004889: node-body-parser: missing types

2022-02-02 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: node-body-parser Version: 1.19.0-5 Severity: normal Hi, i'm actually new to installing files in @types/ is this the right place to report a bug when some ts definitions are missing ? Jérémy -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers stable-security APT policy:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#980316: Update yarnpkg to 2.x versions using corepack repo

2022-02-03 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: yarnpkg Version: 1.22.10+~cs22.25.14-5 Followup-For: Bug #980316 Hi, i just realized that corepack was indeed not installed by nodejs source package. There is a reason for that: unfortunately corepack source is not bundled into nodejs source tarball. The distributed files are the compi

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1005089: Bug#1005089: nodejs: Add node_modules links to nodejs

2022-02-07 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 8:33 AM Yadd wrote: > Package: nodejs > Version: 16.13.2~dfsg-2 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > starting from version 14, nodejs is able to run .mjs files. However, > "import" method only works when dependency is available in node_modules > directories. To avoid having to cr

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1005089: Bug#1005089: Bug#1005089: nodejs: Add node_modules links to nodejs

2022-02-07 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 9:39 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 8:33 AM Yadd wrote: > >> Package: nodejs >> Version: 16.13.2~dfsg-2 >> Severity: normal >> >> Hi, >> >> starting from version 14, nodejs is able to run .

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Rebuilding of nodejs reverse dependencies

2022-02-15 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 4:19 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > On 14/01/22 at 01:46 +0100, Ayoyimika Ajibade wrote: > > Hello Lucas! > > > > Am an outreachy intern working on transitioning of nodejs16, in respect > to > > what you needed to help us with rebuilding > > https://lists.debian.org/de

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] help to port nodejs to Debian riscv

2022-03-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 8:56 AM Yadd wrote: > On 10/03/2022 08:19, vimer wrote: > > Hi, > > According to https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues/2876, The nodejs > > upstream seems have supported riscv64. I want to help port it to Debian > > riscv > > if possible. > > > > But I want to know workfl

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] help to port nodejs to Debian riscv

2022-03-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:20 AM vimer wrote: > Hi, > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:00:10AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 8:56 AM Yadd <[1]y...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > On 10/03/2022 08:19, vimer wrote: > > > Hi, > >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] help to port nodejs to Debian riscv

2022-03-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:20 AM vimer wrote: > >> Hi, >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:00:10AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 8:56 AM Yadd <[1]y...@debian.org> wrote: >>

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] help to port nodejs to Debian riscv

2022-03-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:26 AM Bo YU wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 4:45 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:20 AM vimer wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:00:10AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wro

[Pkg-javascript-devel] trying to fix salsa-ci job for nodejs 14: uscan warn: unknown ctype nodejs

2022-03-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
Hi, i tried to get salsa-ci pass the first step of ci job for nodejs, by adapting a little debian/watch: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/nodejs/-/jobs/2549349 However this warning happens: uscan warn: unknown ctype nodejs After that, the component tarballs are not generated. Is it possible that

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] trying to fix salsa-ci job for nodejs 14: uscan warn: unknown ctype nodejs

2022-03-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 9:44 AM Iñaki Malerba wrote: > Hello Nilesh , > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:43:56PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Hi Ińaki/Santiago, > > > > On 3/11/22 10:34 AM, Yadd wrote: > > > On 11/03/2022 01:28, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] help to port nodejs to Debian riscv

2022-03-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 6:03 AM Yadd wrote: > On 11/03/2022 04:29, Bo YU wrote: > > hi > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:45 PM Jérémy Lal > <mailto:kapo...@melix.org>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:26 AM Bo YU >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] trying to fix salsa-ci job for nodejs 14: uscan warn: unknown ctype nodejs

2022-03-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 10:15 AM Iñaki Malerba wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 9:44 AM Iñaki Malerba wrote: > > > > > Hello Nilesh , > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:43:56PM +

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] help to port nodejs to Debian riscv

2022-03-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 3:26 PM vimer wrote: > Hi, > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 10:12:49AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 6:03 AM Yadd <[1]y...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > On 11/03/2022 04:29, Bo YU wrote: > > > hi > >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] trying to fix salsa-ci job for nodejs 14: uscan warn: unknown ctype nodejs

2022-03-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 6:16 PM Nilesh Patra wrote: > On 3/11/22 7:15 PM, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > (FYI: we a mailing list now: debian-salsa...@alioth-lists.debian.net) > > Thanks! > > >> this is not related to JS packages, ctype is an uscan option introduced > in > >> version 2.20.5. Lo

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1000493: libnode93 breaks with libnode72 but not installed

2022-03-13 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: nodejs Version: 14.19.0~dfsg-1 Followup-For: Bug #1000493 I just got the same trouble, and now i really don't remember the rationale behind: Breaks: libnode64, libnode72 Besides both libnode64 and libnode72 having a file in common: usr/share/systemtap/tapset/node.stp which could bette

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994613: nodejs salsa ci fail

2022-03-13 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: nodejs Followup-For: Bug #994613 Hi, in master-14.x branch the two tests are allowed to fail now. I also noticed some problem with too big artifacts, so i disabled the generation of dbgsym package for ci. Also i'm not in favor of uncontrolled rebuilding of nodejs for each commit. It w

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-13 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: nodejs Followup-For: Bug #994245 X-Debbugs-Cc: Bo YU Hi, recently Bo YU has worked on building nodejs 14 for riscv64. Bo, you can tell us here what you achieved, and what's blocking you right now ? Thanks, Jérémy -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers sta

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994705: MA: same libnode-dev

2022-03-13 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: libnode-dev Version: 14.19.0~dfsg-1 Followup-For: Bug #994705 Hi, I'd like to understand the reason why, if the package contains the same files on all archs, should it install them on arch-dependent paths ? Jérémy -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers stabl

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-14 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 3:58 PM Bo YU wrote: > Hi Jérémy, > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 9:27 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> Package: nodejs >> Followup-For: Bug #994245 >> X-Debbugs-Cc: Bo YU >> >> Hi, >> >> recently Bo YU has worked on building

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Rebuilding of nodejs reverse dependencies

2022-03-14 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 5:53 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > 2022, ഫെബ്രുവരി 15 9:18:23 PM IST, "Jérémy Lal" ൽ എഴുതി > >On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 4:19 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 14/01/22 at 01:46 +0100, Ayoyim

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Rebuilding of nodejs reverse dependencies

2022-03-15 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:32 AM Nilesh Patra wrote: > On 3/15/22 5:21 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > i've setup a specific salsa ci pipeline for this: > > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/nodejs/-/pipelines/358409 < > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/nodejs/-/pipelines/3584

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Rebuilding of nodejs reverse dependencies

2022-03-15 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:42 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:32 AM Nilesh Patra wrote: > >> On 3/15/22 5:21 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> > i've setup a specific salsa ci pipeline for this: >> > https://salsa.debian.org/js-

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Rebuilding of nodejs reverse dependencies

2022-03-15 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 1:01 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:42 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:32 AM Nilesh Patra wrote: >> >>> On 3/15/22 5:21 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>> > i&#x

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-16 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:46 PM Bo YU wrote: > HI > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:03 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 3:58 PM Bo YU wrote: >> >>> Hi Jérémy, >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 9:27 AM Jérémy Lal

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Rebuilding of nodejs reverse dependencies

2022-03-16 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 1:01 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 1:01 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:42 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:32 AM Nil

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Rebuilding of nodejs reverse dependencies

2022-03-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:19 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 1:01 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 1:01 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:42 AM Jérémy Lal wr

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Rebuilding of nodejs reverse dependencies

2022-03-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 3:10 PM Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi Jérémy, > > Il 17/03/22 13:26, Jérémy Lal ha scritto: > > ... > > > > So I ended up installing a gitlab-runner with nspawn-runner and a > > semi-active server I maintain. > > I doc

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007841: node-nodedbi: FTBFS with nodejs experimental/14.19.0

2022-03-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: node-nodedbi Version: 1.0.14-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'testing') Architecture:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007845: node-babel7: FTBFS with nodejs experimental/14.19.0

2022-03-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: node-babel7 Version: 7.17.6+~cs214.260.190-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'testing')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007848: node-addressparser: FTBFS with nodejs experimental/14.19.0

2022-03-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: node-addressparser Version: 1.0.1+repack-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'testing') A

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007844: jquery: FTBFS with nodejs experimental/14.19.0

2022-03-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: jquery Version: 3.3.1~dfsg-3 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'testing') Architecture: a

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007849: node-collection-visit: FTBFS with nodejs experimental/14.19.0

2022-03-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: node-collection-visit Version: 1.0.0-3 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'testing') Archi

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007852: node-chroma-js: FTBFS with nodejs experimental/14.19.0

2022-03-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: node-chroma-js Version: 2.1.1+dfsg-3 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'testing') Archite

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007853: node-stealthy-require: FTBFS with nodejs experimental/14.19.0

2022-03-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: node-stealthy-require Version: 1.1.1-5 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'testing') Archi

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007875: node-use: FTBFS with nodejs experimental/14.19.0

2022-03-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: node-use Version: 3.1.1-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'testing') Architecture: amd6

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007876: node-xxhashjs: FTBFS with nodejs experimental/14.19.0

2022-03-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: node-xxhashjs Version: 0.2.2+dfsg-5 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'testing') Architec

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007893: FTBFS: pkg-js-tools dh_auto_build fails debian/nodejs/szmarczak-http-timer/build

2022-03-18 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: node-got Version: 11.8.3+~cs58.7.37-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source No build command found, searching known files Found debian/nodejs/normalize-url/build cd ./normalize-url && sh -ex ../debian/nodejs/normalize-url/build + babeljs --presets

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007894: FTBFS: fails with pkg-js-tools dh_auto_build debian/nodejs/rxjs/build

2022-03-18 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: node-inquirer Version: 8.2.0+~cs26.5.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source Found debian/nodejs/additional_components Adding component(s): packages/checkbox, packages/confirm, packages/core, packages/editor, packages/expand, packages/input, packages/i

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007895: node-jest: FTBFS pkg-js-tools dh_auto_build debian/nodejs/bcoe-v8-coverage/build

2022-03-18 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: node-jest Version: 27.5.1~ds+~cs69.51.22-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) No build command found, searching known files Found debian/nodejs/bcoe-v8-coverage/build cd ./bcoe-v8-coverage && sh -ex ../debian

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-18 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 8:25 AM Bo YU wrote: > Hi Jérémy, > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 7:11 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:46 PM Bo YU wrote: >> >>> HI >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:03 PM Jérémy La

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007855: Bug#1007855: node-memfs: FTBFS with nodejs experimental/14.19.0

2022-03-18 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:51:07 +0100 Yadd wrote: > On 17/03/2022 19:21, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > Source: node-memfs > > Version: 3.4.1+~cs1.0.3-1 > > Severity: important > > Tags: ftbfs > > > > This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached. > > Hi,

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007841: Bug#1007841: node-nodedbi: FTBFS with nodejs experimental/14.19.0

2022-03-18 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 7:09 AM Yadd wrote: > On 17/03/2022 19:02, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > Source: node-nodedbi > > Version: 1.0.14-2 > > Severity: important > > Tags: ftbfs > > > > This package fails to rebuild. Build log is attached. > > There was a

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007910: node-graceful-fs: Upgrade node-graceful-fs to version 4.2.9 to ensure compatibility with node >= 14

2022-03-18 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: node-graceful-fs Version: 4.2.4+repack-1 Severity: normal This is the reason behind #1007855: a new option in nodejs 14 is available on fs.statSync (throwIfNoEntry), which made node-graceful-fs crash (not so gracefully): https://github.com/isaacs/node-graceful-fs/commit/e61a20a052b838f42

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007894: Bug#1007894: FTBFS: fails with pkg-js-tools dh_auto_build debian/nodejs/rxjs/build

2022-03-18 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 1:21 PM Yadd wrote: > On 18/03/2022 09:38, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > Package: node-inquirer > > Version: 8.2.0+~cs26.5.5-1 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: ftbfs > > Justification: fails to build from source > > > > Found d

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1008037: FTBFS: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_nodejs_substvars line 21

2022-03-21 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: sax.js Version: 1.2.4+~1.2.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source This happened during rebuild of this package: dh_nodejs_substvars No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_nodejs_substvars line 21. make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 2 dpkg-b

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1008037: Bug#1008037: FTBFS: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_nodejs_substvars line 21

2022-03-21 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:54 AM Yadd wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On 21/03/2022 09:02, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > Source: sax.js > > Version: 1.2.4+~1.2.4-1 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: ftbfs > > Justification: fails to build from source >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1008063: transition: nodejs

2022-03-21 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Javascript Maintainers Hi, this transition correspond to a nodejs 12 -> 14 major major bump. I carefully checked (twice, actually) that all build-dependencies of

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1008061: Bug#1008061: Bug#1008061: node-builtins: Returns a wrong list of builtins module

2022-03-21 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 6:57 PM Yadd wrote: > > > On 21/03/2022 18:15, Yadd wrote: > > Package: node-builtins > > Version: 4.0.0-1 > > Severity: important > > > > Hi, > > > > node-builtins returns a static modules list which is up-to date for > > Node.js < 11. It should be patched to use node-bui

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1008061: Bug#1008061: Bug#1008061: Bug#1008061: node-builtins: Returns a wrong list of builtins module

2022-03-21 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 8:15 PM Yadd wrote: > > > Le 21 mars 2022 19:04:24 GMT+01:00, "Jérémy Lal" a > écrit : > >On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 6:57 PM Yadd wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 21/03/2022 18:15, Yadd wrote: > >> >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1008100: node-modern-syslog: FTBFS since node-tap 15

2022-03-22 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: node-modern-syslog Version: 1.2.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The test run during build is failing. Since node-tap 15, test coverage is on by default, and fails when < 100%. -- System Information: Debian

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1008110: Bug#1008110: nodejs: Missing @types/node/package.json blocks many tsc builds

2022-03-22 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 5:42 PM Yadd wrote: > Package: nodejs > Version: 16.13.2+really14.19.1~dfsg-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS > > nodejs 14 installs @types/node files except package.json. This render > typescript declaration unusable and blocks typescript builds.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-23 Thread Jérémy Lal
(please avoid top-posting, it makes the discussion hard to read for newcomers - my reply is at the bottom) On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 12:53 AM Bo YU wrote: > s/check/builtin > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 7:50 AM Bo YU wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 202

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-23 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 1:05 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: > (please avoid top-posting, it makes the discussion hard to read > for newcomers - my reply is at the bottom) > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 12:53 AM Bo YU wrote: > >> s/check/builtin >> >> On Thu, Mar

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node12, node14, ... and alternatives to allow proper transitions

2022-03-24 Thread Jérémy Lal
Hi, (libnode72 is for nodejs 12, libnode83 is for nodejs 14) I made sure one can co-install libnode72 and libnode83, and removed libnode83 Breaks libnode72, because it made it really difficult to rebuild packages from unstable against the latest version of nodejs. when a libnode-dev (=12) addon i

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007248: nodejs trying to overwrite /usr/share/systemtap/tapset/node.stp

2022-03-24 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 11:15 PM Daniel Leidert wrote: > reopen 1007248 > thanks > > I just got hit by this bug as well: > > Entpacken von nodejs (16.13.2+really14.19.1~dfsg-5) über (12.22.9~dfsg-1) > ... > dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-DvPfq0/442- > nodejs_16.13.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-24 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:11 AM Bo YU wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 01:11:40AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 1:05 AM Jérémy Lal <[1]kapo...@melix.org> > > wrote: > > > > --build=any > ... > > > > Hi, > &g

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-24 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:17 AM Bo YU wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:11 AM Bo YU wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 01:11:40AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 1:05 AM Jérémy Lal <[1]kapo...@melix.org> >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-24 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:23 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:17 AM Bo YU wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:11 AM Bo YU wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 01:11:40AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>> &

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-24 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:55 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:23 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:17 AM Bo YU wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:11 AM Bo YU wrote: >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-25 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:10 AM Bo YU wrote: > hi, > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:31 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:55 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:23 AM Jérémy Lal w

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node12, node14, ... and alternatives to allow proper transitions

2022-03-25 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 11:38 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: > Hi, > (libnode72 is for nodejs 12, libnode83 is for nodejs 14) > > I made sure one can co-install libnode72 and libnode83, and removed > libnode83 Breaks libnode72, because it made it really difficult > to rebuild pack

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-25 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:58 AM Bo YU wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 4:12 PM Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:10 AM Bo YU wrote: >> >>> hi, >>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] New JS team mailing list?

2022-03-25 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 4:39 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Nilesh Patra (2022-03-25 15:59:51) > > On 3/25/22 8:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Everyone *are* allowed to post, we actively *chose* sensoring, and I > > > *volunteer* to screen it to avoid spam on the list. > > > > ACK. >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994245: nodejs: improve bootstraping nodejs

2022-03-26 Thread Jérémy Lal
Update: Thanks to the dedication of Bo YU, who proved it was possible to two-stage build nodejs (16) on riscv64, I am now rebuilding it on my own and plan to upload it ASAP. I am concerned by build-reproducibility now. Jérémy -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-list

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] nodejs_16.14.2+dfsg-2.changes REJECTED

2022-03-29 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:26 AM Bo YU wrote: > Hi, > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 08:36:19PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > > > >nodejs_16.14.2+dfsg-2.changes: Does not match re_file_changes > I have consult the ftp master folks about the issue, their giveback is > > daklib/regexes.py:re_file_

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Update package with new type & api

2022-03-29 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:54 PM Yadd wrote: > Hi all, > > some packages, especially those from Sindre Sorhus, changed both: > * language from commonjs to ECMA only ("type": "module") > * API: > const foo = require("foo"); // gives also foo.bar > becomes: > import { foo, fooBar

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1008774: node-path-exists: Please add (back) CommonJS support

2022-04-01 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: node-path-exists Version: 5.0.0-3 Severity: important Version 5 of this package doesn't support being require()-d. It's a reverse dep of existing packages like node-sqlite3, which now fails and prevent migration of nodejs :( Jérémy -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1008775: node-expat: Odd autopkgtest failure, prevents migration of nodejs

2022-04-01 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: node-expat Version: 2.4.0+ds-1 Severity: normal Hi, while your package's autopkgtests pass, there is an odd failure: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/node-expat/20479881/log.gz sadly, that will prevent migration of nodejs. Could you help determine the source of the

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1008775: Bug#1008775: node-expat: Odd autopkgtest failure, prevents migration of nodejs

2022-04-01 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 10:42 AM Jérémy Lal wrote: > Source: node-expat > Version: 2.4.0+ds-1 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > while your package's autopkgtests pass, there is an odd failure: > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/node-expat/2047

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1008908: node-p-locate: please export as commonjs module

2022-04-03 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: node-p-locate Version: 6.0.0-8 Severity: serious Justification: autopkgtest regressions Hi, this is the cause of several regressions. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'test

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1007858: Bug#1007858: Bug#1007858: node-lodash: FTBFS with nodejs experimental/14.19.0

2022-04-06 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:30 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Yadd (2022-04-06 18:12:30) > > On 19/03/2022 08:38, Yadd wrote: > > > On 19/03/2022 08:11, Yadd wrote: > > >> On 17/03/2022 19:21, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > >>> Source: node-lodash > &g

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1009233: Bug#1009233: node-d3: depends on nodejs

2022-04-09 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 2:21 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Package: node-d3 > Version: 5.16.0-4 > Severity: normal > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > The binary package node-d3 depends on nodejs. > > Dependencies are directional: Packages with code that _calls_ other code > s

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Advice on packaging a terminal application that uses yarn and webpack

2022-04-13 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 6:32 PM Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Hello, > > I was looking into packaging spyder-terminal, a plugin for Spyder (a > Python IDE) that provides a shell terminal. But it turns out that far > from being a Python application, it is essentially a wrapper around a > Javascript app

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFP shepherd.js, maybe?

2022-04-13 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 6:32 PM Philip Hands wrote: > Hi, > > (I'm not subscribed, so please CC: me) > > Recent versions of openQA make use of shepherd.js, which the openQA > build system gets in the form of a single file, built output, from here: > > https://shepherdjs.dev/dist/js/shepherd.js

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Advice on packaging a terminal application that uses yarn and webpack

2022-04-14 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le jeu. 14 avr. 2022 à 15:27, Julian Gilbey a écrit : > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 08:22:45PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 6:32 PM Julian Gilbey > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I was looking into p

[Pkg-javascript-devel] icu 71.1-2 (source) into unstable -> nodejs 16 will follow

2022-04-22 Thread Jérémy Lal
Hi, Excellent news ! ICU 71 is coming to sid... meaning nodejs 16 will come along soon. Nodejs 18 requires more work (undici -> llhttp, some wasm things to work out, please help). Jérémy -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debia

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] icu 71.1-2 (source) into unstable -> nodejs 16 will follow

2022-04-22 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le ven. 22 avr. 2022 à 23:30, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2022-04-22 21:27:19) > > Excellent news ! ICU 71 is coming to sid... meaning nodejs 16 will > > come along soon. > > > > Nodejs 18 requires more work (undici -> llhttp, some wasm thing

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] icu 71.1-2 (source) into unstable -> nodejs 16 will follow

2022-04-22 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le ven. 22 avr. 2022 à 23:39, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2022-04-22 23:30:58) > > Le ven. 22 avr. 2022 à 23:30, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit > : > > > > > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2022-04-22 21:27:19) > > > > Excellent news ! ICU 71 is

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010069: nodejs: FTBFS test failure on mipsel-osuosl-05.debian.org

2022-04-23 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: nodejs Version: 16.13.2+really14.19.1~dfsg-6 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=nodejs&arch=mipsel&ver=16.13.2%2Breally14.19.1~dfsg-6%2Bb1&stamp=1650719824&file=log

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010093: node-postcss-loader: $requires webpack >= 5

2022-04-24 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: node-postcss-loader Version: 6.2.1+~cs7.0.11-2 Severity: normal Hi, from the changelog: 5.0.0 (2021-02-02) warning BREAKING CHANGES minimum supported webpack version is 5 Breaking change is: https://github.com/webpack-contrib/postcss-loader/commit/1d4878171c9b94c9fea61b1b75340674e00be7

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010410: node-tape: Cannot esm-import package 'tape'

2022-04-30 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: node-tape Version: 5.5.3+~cs8.20.16-1 Severity: important tape's package.json probably needs some fix: cat tmp.mjs import * as tape from 'tape' node tmp.mjs internal/process/esm_loader.js:74 internalBinding('errors').triggerUncaughtException( ^ Error

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010413: mocha: ftbfs with nodejs 16: workerpool needs to be updated

2022-04-30 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: mocha Version: 9.2.2+ds1+~cs28.3.8-1 Severity: important Hi, node-crc ftbfs with nodejs 16 because mocha's parallel mode does: workerpool fails with: TypeError: The "options" argument must be of type object. Received an instance of Array at ChildProcess.target.send (node:internal/ch

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010457: ftbfs: test failure will prevent nodejs 16 migration

2022-05-01 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: node-browserify-zlib Version: 0.2.0+20170820git8b3f0a862f6b+dfsg-7 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs This module is old and uses internal nodejs api. Also it still assumes old streams model: it is a miracle it has not many more tests failures. I attached a NON-working patch, to help anyone

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010471: eslint: please move Recommends to Depends

2022-05-02 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: eslint Version: 6.4.0~dfsg+~6.1.9-5 Severity: normal Hi, I was trying to fix "enigmail" FTBFS, and discovered that it was simply missing all the packages that "eslint" recommends. enigmail Build-Depends: eslint , node-chalk , node-strip-ansi , node-text-table Those three packages a

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1004244: eslint: Please update at least to version ≥ 7

2022-05-02 Thread Jérémy Lal
Source: eslint Followup-For: Bug #1004244 About eslint 8 dependencies: - v8-compile-cache, one of the missing deps, is in NEW. - @humanwhocodes/config-array should be bundled, it's barely useful outside eslint - @eslint/eslintrc should be bundled: "It is ESLint-specific and not intended for use

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010471: Bug#1010471: eslint: please move Recommends to Depends

2022-05-02 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le lun. 2 mai 2022 à 11:24, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > tags -1 wontfix > > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2022-05-02 09:50:54) > > I was trying to fix "enigmail" FTBFS, and discovered that it was > > simply missing all the packages that "eslint" recommends. > &

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010471: Bug#1010471: eslint: please move Recommends to Depends

2022-05-02 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le lun. 2 mai 2022 à 11:54, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2022-05-02 11:45:36) > > I stand by saying as it is, putting those packages: > > node-chalk > > node-strip-ansi > > node-text-table > > in Recommends just breaks the default func

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010471: Bug#1010471: Bug#1010471: eslint: please move Recommends to Depends

2022-05-02 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le lun. 2 mai 2022 à 12:24, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2022-05-02 11:59:15) > > Le lun. 2 mai 2022 à 11:54, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > > > > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2022-05-02 11:45:36) > > > > I stand by saying as it is, puttin

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010069: Bug#1010069: nodejs: FTBFS test failure on mipsel-osuosl-05.debian.org

2022-05-02 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le sam. 23 avr. 2022 à 17:18, Jérémy Lal a écrit : > Package: nodejs > Version: 16.13.2+really14.19.1~dfsg-6 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the > past) > > > https://buildd.debian.org/statu

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010497: nodejs: autopkgtest failure: parallel/test-crypto-engine requires built artifacts

2022-05-02 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: nodejs Version: 16.14.2+dfsg-4 Severity: normal That failure comes from the fact the test is expecting some build artifacts to be present. However nodejs currently runs its autopkgtest suite on unbuilt source. not ok 424 parallel/test-crypto-engine --- duration_ms: 0.715 severity

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010509: nodejs: test failure on riscv64: sequential/test-cpu-prof-worker-argv

2022-05-02 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: nodejs Version: 16.14.2+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) I'll disable the test for now. The failure: not ok 2933 sequential/test-cpu-prof-worker-argv --- duration_ms: 2.317 severity: fail exitcode

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Questions about using ES modules in CJS.

2022-05-03 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le mar. 3 mai 2022 à 13:56, Yadd a écrit : > On 03/05/2022 13:15, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > > > On ചൊ, മേയ് 3 2022 at 06:41:01 വൈകു +0800 +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) > > wrote: > >> Hi Praveen, > >> > >> Sorry for bothering but I just got lots of questions about using ES > >> modules and

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010471: Bug#1010471: Bug#1010471: Bug#1010471: eslint: please move Recommends to Depends

2022-05-04 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le lun. 2 mai 2022 à 12:48, Jérémy Lal a écrit : > > > Le lun. 2 mai 2022 à 12:24, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > >> Quoting Jérémy Lal (2022-05-02 11:59:15) >> > Le lun. 2 mai 2022 à 11:54, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> > >> > > Quoting Jéré

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010574: node-yaml: does not export as commonjs

2022-05-04 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: node-yaml Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: important Hi, require('yaml') doesn't work. I'm available to sort this out, of course. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010509: Bug#1010509: nodejs: add more info about build fail on riscv64

2022-05-05 Thread Jérémy Lal
Hi, Le jeu. 5 mai 2022 à 11:12, Bo YU a écrit : > > ``` > > Error: Unrecognized type: 'string\[]'. > Please, edit the type or update 'file:///<>/debian/doc-generator/type-parser.mjs'. > at file:///<>/debian/doc-generator/type-parser.mjs:297:15 > ``` That's the documentation generator, non-fatal

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >