Quoting Chris Lamb (2019-09-27 12:17:47)
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > I don't understand the explanation, but have now uploaded same
> > package again.
>
> * Package version 1 gets uploaded.
>
> * Package gets reviewed and a comment added.
>
> * Comment reaches maintainer either
Hi Chris and other ftpmasters,
Quoting Chris Lamb (2019-09-27 11:18:48)
> > Above concern seems obsolete: I firmly believe that the above
> > referenced problematic path (with slash not backslah) is stripped
> > from the repackaged source 0.4.0+dfsg
> >
> > How to proceed from here?!?
>
>
Hi Jonas,
> Above concern seems obsolete: I firmly believe that the above referenced
> problematic path (with slash not backslah) is stripped from the
> repackaged source 0.4.0+dfsg
>
> How to proceed from here?!?
This is just a regrettable race condition in the upload/commenting/
processing
Quoting Chris Lamb (2019-09-27 11:00:11)
>
> Forwarding notes from anonymous ftptrainee (please do not expect a reply from
> myself..):
>
> REJECT
>
> src\schemas\JOSEHeaderSchema.js contains multiple paragraphs copied
> from IETF standards, which are not DFSG-free,
Forwarding notes from anonymous ftptrainee (please do not expect a reply from
myself..):
REJECT
src\schemas\JOSEHeaderSchema.js contains multiple paragraphs copied
from IETF standards, which are not DFSG-free, because their license
does not permit derivative
