Le 10/09/2018 à 07:59, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 7:33 AM Xavier wrote:
>>
>> Le 09/09/2018 à 23:36, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
>>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:17 PM Xavier wrote:
Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 7:33 AM Xavier wrote:
>
> Le 09/09/2018 à 23:36, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:17 PM Xavier wrote:
> >>
> >> Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a écrit :
> >>> Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM
Le 09/09/2018 à 23:36, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:17 PM Xavier wrote:
>>
>> Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a écrit :
>>> Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
>
> Hi Bastien,
>
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:17 PM Xavier wrote:
>
> Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a écrit :
> > Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Thorsten Alteholz
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Bastien,
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>
Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bastien,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> - put together packages that belong together; I am not sure
Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bastien,
>>
>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
- put together packages that belong together; I am not sure here, but
wouldn't it be fine to have just
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi Bastien,
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> >> - put together packages that belong together; I am not sure here, but
> >> wouldn't it be fine to have just one package node-d3 or node-babel
> >> that contains
Hi,
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018, Pirate Praveen wrote:
I suggest we categorize the packages in NEW and process accordingly. I can help
with categorizing it.
I propose the following,
1. Simple modules that could be embedded - REJECT.
2. Modules that includes a build step, for example that needs babel,
Hi Bastien,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
- put together packages that belong together; I am not sure here, but
wouldn't it be fine to have just one package node-d3 or node-babel
that contains all corresponding modules (though their different versions
might create
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Xavier wrote:
>
> Le 05/09/2018 à 23:14, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi everybody,
> >>>
> >>> as you already
Le 06/09/2018 à 08:05, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> On 06/09/18 10:15 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> I suggest we categorize the packages in NEW and process accordingly. I can
>> help with categorizing it.
>>
>> I propose the following,
>>
>> 1. Simple modules that could be embedded - REJECT.
>> 2.
On 06/09/18 10:15 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I suggest we categorize the packages in NEW and process accordingly. I can
> help with categorizing it.
>
> I propose the following,
>
> 1. Simple modules that could be embedded - REJECT.
> 2. Modules that includes a build step, for example that
n Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:29 PM Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
>
>
> 2018-09-05 23:14 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES :
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > > In order to not lose track of the
2018-09-05 23:14 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES :
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz
> wrote:
>
> > > In order to not lose track of the installed software, providing
> something
> > > like debian/modules.embedded
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in
> > NEW. Does Debian really need all those packages?
> >
> > node packages
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in
> NEW. Does Debian really need all those packages?
>
> node packages are rather small and often consist only of a few lines of
> code. From my
Le 05/09/2018 à 22:58, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 05/09/2018 à 22:45, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in
>> NEW. Does Debian really need all those packages?
>>
>> node packages are rather small and often consist only
Le 05/09/2018 à 22:45, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
> Hi everybody,
>
> as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in
> NEW. Does Debian really need all those packages?
>
> node packages are rather small and often consist only of a few lines of
> code. From my point of
18 matches
Mail list logo
