[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#670836: libv8: please enable for kfreebsd-*

2012-04-29 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Package: src:libv8 Version: 3.8.9.20-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Hi, I found that it is quite easy to build libv8 on GNU/kFreeBSD, with only minor changes to its packaging for Debian: 1. Enable

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#670836: [PATCH 1/4] Enable kfreebsd-* builds of the package

2012-04-29 Thread steven
From: Steven Chamberlain ste...@kfreebsd-i386.pyro.eu.org --- debian/rules |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 7a4fa20..94d7c18 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ libSoname = libv8.so.$(SONAME) #

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#670836: [PATCH 2/4] Set v8arch/v8os suitably on GNU/kFreeBSD

2012-04-29 Thread steven
From: Steven Chamberlain ste...@kfreebsd-i386.pyro.eu.org --- debian/rules |4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 94d7c18..2652df7 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -34,9 +34,11 @@ v8arch := $(or $(v8arch),$(if

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#670836: [PATCH 4/4] Create a kfreebsd target based on existing freebsd

2012-04-29 Thread steven
From: Steven Chamberlain ste...@kfreebsd-i386.pyro.eu.org A clone of the existing freebsd target, with -lpthread added and -lexecinfo removed --- tools/gyp/v8.gyp | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/gyp/v8.gyp b/tools/gyp/v8.gyp index a659782..b9b32b9 100644

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#650343: nodejs: please provide nodejs command as a synonym for node

2012-04-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: IMO this change only makes sense because Policy (and an opposite camp equally stubborn as we are, but IMO by a weaker reasoning) forces us to do so. If that's the case, then I don't support it. I really don't want to be part of a bad technical decision made to

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#650343: nodejs: please provide nodejs command as a synonym for node

2012-04-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi again, Some clarifications. Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Oh, I am confused now: Didn't you hint yourself that upstream might not like it? Re-reading I now see that you wrote ...without a patch, Right, I think it is unlikely that upstream would be happy to see anyone asking them to work on

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#650343: Bug#650343: nodejs: please provide nodejs command as a synonym for node

2012-04-29 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-04-29 at 12:18pm, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Oh, I am confused now: Didn't you hint yourself that upstream might not like it? Re-reading I now see that you wrote ...without a patch, Right, I think it is unlikely that upstream would be happy to see anyone

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#650343: nodejs: please provide nodejs command as a synonym for node

2012-04-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Isn't your patch about promoting that alternative name instead of the former? I see a loss of that (from an upstream POV) as it renders current documentation, books and code slightly confusing (albeit still working fine). What is the gain (for upstream) in