Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Hi,
> a similar question can be asked for v8-ppc port, too.
> I need some help for taking a decision here.
>
> If those ports pass v8 test suites and are maintained, then we should
> consider having them in debian. I'm a little worried about security
> issues, though.
The id
Dear maintainer!
While processing your upload of rickshaw 1.4.6-1, I noticed a couple
of oddities and mistakes:
- tutorial/vendor/prettify/prettify.js is under Apache-2.0, (C) 2006
Google, yet, is not documented in debian/copyright. Even if unused,
all files should be covered. And d/copyr
leaflet-markercluster_0.4~dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
leaflet-markercluster_0.4~dfsg-1.dsc
leaflet-markercluster_0.4~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
leaflet-markercluster_0.4~dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
libjs-leaflet-markercluster_0.4~dfsg-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:41:34 +0100
Source: leaflet-markercluster
Binary: libjs-leaflet-markercluster
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4~dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintai
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:03:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#733116: fixed in leaflet-markercluster 0.4~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #733116,
regarding libjs-leaflet-markercluster: Does not work with current libjs-leaflet
to be marked as done.
This means that
queue-async_1.0.7-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
queue-async_1.0.7-1.dsc
queue-async_1.0.7.orig.tar.gz
queue-async_1.0.7-1.debian.tar.xz
libjs-queue-async_1.0.7-1_all.deb
node-queue-async_1.0.7-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daem
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:17:09 +0100
Source: queue-async
Binary: libjs-queue-async node-queue-async
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Ch
