After some investigation, I discovered upstream is developing a new
release major 1.0.0.
I guess it is better wait for it. Dependencies are deeply changing in
the master branch:
https://github.com/LearnBoost/socket.io/blob/master/package.json
Best,
Leo.
--
Ubuntu Member -
On 30 April 2014 02:39, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Interesting.
Really, which tools do you use to inspect files covered by some
copyright in a software?
It's now accessible (thank you Leo) from the Nodejs page, as best
practice manual:
Hi all,
I would like to make mocha available in debian:
https://github.com/visionmedia/mocha
To do that, we need jade, which is required by mocha as dependency.
If you want help, here the task page about packaging jade:
https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Tasks/Jade
Regards,
Leo.
--
Hi Leo,
On Mi 30 Apr 2014 10:15:04 CEST, Leo Iannacone wrote:
After some investigation, I discovered upstream is developing a new
release major 1.0.0.
I guess it is better wait for it. Dependencies are deeply changing in
the master branch:
Node browserify is a kind of software which makes node modules
compatible and runnable for browsers.
It seems many modules use it, so it would be nice package it.
I have taken a look, and it madly depends on dozens of packages/modules[0].
My question is:
do you know if exist something else
Hi Mike!
On 30 April 2014 10:27, Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de wrote:
you could start with preparing packages for the new dependencies...
I will start with the devDependencies:
devDependencies: {
mocha: 1.16.2,
expect.js: 0.3.1,
supertest: 0.8.2,
superagent:
Hi Leo,
On Mi 30 Apr 2014 10:49:12 CEST, Leo Iannacone wrote:
Hi Mike!
On 30 April 2014 10:27, Mike Gabriel
mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de wrote:
you could start with preparing packages for the new dependencies...
I will start with the devDependencies:
devDependencies: {
mocha:
Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-04-30 10:20:28)
On 30 April 2014 02:39, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Interesting.
Really, which tools do you use to inspect files covered by some
copyright in a software?
Depends on the needs - concretely I currently use exiftool and otfinfo.
For more
Quoting Jérémy Lal (2014-04-30 11:59:08)
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 11:45 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-04-30 10:20:28)
On 30 April 2014 02:39, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
If /usr/lib/nodejs/express/package.json exists, nodejs uses it to
find the
Hi Jonas,
On 30 April 2014 02:10, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Status of packaging is that these libraries needs packaging first:
node-source-map
node-uglify-to-browserify
About node-uglify-to-browserify:
You do not really need to package it, since it's only related to
uglify2.x
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 12:35 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
Hi Jonas,
On 30 April 2014 02:10, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Status of packaging is that these libraries needs packaging first:
node-source-map
node-uglify-to-browserify
About node-uglify-to-browserify:
On 30 April 2014 12:53, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
About node-source-map:
It build-depends on dryice (=0.4.8). You can find a pre-release
package in pkg-javascript/node-dryice.git repository.
Once it done/uploaded to unstable, we will be able to build source-map.
I can help about
Your message dated Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:43:44 +0200
with message-id 5360e1f0.8010...@pocock.pro
and subject line duplicate
has caused the Debian Bug report #746120,
regarding jssip: FTBFS: make[2]: java: Command not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
node-express_4.1.1~dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-express_4.1.1~dfsg-1_all.deb
node-express_4.1.1~dfsg-1.dsc
node-express_4.1.1~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
node-express_4.1.1~dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:31:24 +0200
Source: node-express
Binary: node-express
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.1.1~dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Your message dated Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:51:35 +
with message-id e1wfxjl-0005im...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#742178: fixed in node-express 4.1.1~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #742178,
regarding node-express 4.0 released
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:51:35 +
with message-id e1wfxjl-0005im...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#742178: fixed in node-express 4.1.1~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #742178,
regarding node-express: Please update node-express to the latest release
to be marked as
FYI: The status of the rickshaw source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.4.6-1
Current version: 1.5.0.dfsg-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 14:34 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
[assuming all involved are subscribed: posting only to bugreport]
Quoting Jérémy Lal (2014-04-30 12:53:22)
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 12:35 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
On 30 April 2014 02:10, Jonas Smedegaard
node-character-parser is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-character-parser.git
On 30 April 2014 21:48, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote:
node-css-parse is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git
--
Ubuntu
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 21:48 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
node-css-parse is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git
* upstream is actually
https://github.com/reworkcss/css-parse
* benchmarks/large.css must be excluded, for it contains way too
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 22:11 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
node-character-parser is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-character-parser.git
On 30 April 2014 21:48, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote:
node-css-parse is ready here:
On 30 April 2014 22:20, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 21:48 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
node-css-parse is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git
* upstream is actually
https://github.com/reworkcss/css-parse
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 22:55 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
On 30 April 2014 22:20, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 21:48 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
node-css-parse is ready here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git
Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-04-30 23:26:44)
On 30 April 2014 23:11, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
It's not all right to remove other files without good reasons.
Here, you can have a doubt about the license of the other css file, but
there is no doubt the js file is correctly licensed,
Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 01:11 +0200, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 00:18 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-04-30 23:26:44)
On 30 April 2014 23:11, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
It's not all right to remove other files without good reasons.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014, at 05:40 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Ramakrishnan,
Quoting Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan (2014-04-24 04:00:58)
I noticed that uglify has two series of releases and two upstream
repositories maintained, one for 1.x versions and another for 2.x and
Debian packages
27 matches
Mail list logo