FYI: The status of the node-express-generator source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.0.0-1
Current version: 4.0.0-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day y
FYI: The status of the node-keese source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.1-1
Current version: 1.0.1-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rece
binary:libjs-jquery-i18n-properties is NEW.
source:jquery-i18n-properties is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient
Package: node-jade
Version: 1.3.1+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
Please consider packaging a newer upstream version of node-jade. The
latest version available is 1.5.0, which contains some changes necessary
for e.g. isso (ITP bug #729218)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 729218 with 757058
Bug #729218 [wnpp] ITP: isso -- web-based commenting system
729218 was blocked by: 745687
729218 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 729218: 757058
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
tags 757058 +patch
thanks
If you find it convenient, I've pushed an updated repository that
imports a new upstream release to
git://git.debian.org/users/jelmer/node-jade.git. I didn't need to make
any other changes to the package other than adding a changelog entry,
so perhaps cloning that repo is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 757058 +patch
Bug #757058 [node-jade] New upstream version is available (1.5.0)
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
757058: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> > I've seen ITPs for a massive set of tiny-looking node libraries go
> > past on -devel in the last few months, so I thought it was about time
> > I looked at one. I'm a bit worried by what I've seen, considering
