node-coffeeify_2.0.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-coffeeify_2.0.1-1.dsc
node-coffeeify_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
node-coffeeify_2.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
node-coffeeify_2.0.1-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 21:07:49 +0100
Source: node-coffeeify
Binary: node-coffeeify
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Changed-By: Ross
dompurify.js_0.7.3~dfsg1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
dompurify.js_0.7.3~dfsg1-1.dsc
dompurify.js_0.7.3~dfsg1.orig.tar.gz
dompurify.js_0.7.3~dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
libjs-dompurify_0.7.3~dfsg1-1_all.deb
node-dompurify_0.7.3~dfsg1-1_all.deb
Greeti
"Expat or GPL-2.0" but labeled MIT in file (and in package.json)
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel maili
binary:libjs-dompurify is NEW.
binary:node-dompurify is NEW.
source:dompurify.js is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be
Hello Chris,
On 27/12/15 06:00 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> "Expat or GPL-2.0" but labeled MIT in file (and in package.json)
I am not sure the header and package.json syntax allow for dual
licenses. The `readme.md` file says the following:
> All code is open source and dual licensed under GPL and MIT
