[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-estraverse 4.2.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the node-estraverse source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 4.2.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-json-parse-helpfulerror 1.0.3-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the node-json-parse-helpfulerror source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1.0.3-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-esutils 2.0.2-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the node-esutils source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 2.0.2-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-cjson 0.4.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the node-cjson source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 0.4.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] /usr/bin/nodejs vs /usr/bin/node

2016-10-21 7:24 GMT+02:00 Paul Gevers : > Hi Daniel, > > On 21-10-16 06:55, Daniel Lo Nigro wrote: > > Given the amount of complexity stemming from Debian renaming this binary > > and the fact that it breaks parts of the Node.js ecosystem, is there any > > chance it will be

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-fs.realpath_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:20:26 +0530 Source: node-fs.realpath Binary: node-fs.realpath Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of libuv1_1.9.1-2_amd64.changes

libuv1_1.9.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libuv1_1.9.1-2.dsc libuv1_1.9.1-2.debian.tar.xz libuv1-dbg_1.9.1-2_amd64.deb libuv1-dev_1.9.1-2_amd64.deb libuv1_1.9.1-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#841587: node-livescript: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: /usr/bin/lsc: not found

Source: node-livescript Version: 1.5.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161021 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#841614: node-es6-promise: FTBFS: compile-modules shows help

Source: node-es6-promise Version: 3.2.2+ds-1 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161021 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#841558: node-tap: FTBFS: help2man: can't get `--help' info from bin/tap.js

2016-10-21 15:52 GMT+02:00 Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org>: > Source: node-tap > Version: 0.7.1-1.1 > Severity: serious > Tags: stretch sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161021 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > Hi, >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] My recent bugs

Hi. It has been pointed to me that this was already reported. I'm going to merge the bugs so that you don't have to. Sorry. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] /usr/bin/nodejs vs /usr/bin/node

Hi Daniel, Quoting Jérémy Lal (2016-10-21 09:05:04) > 2016-10-21 7:24 GMT+02:00 Paul Gevers : > > On 21-10-16 06:55, Daniel Lo Nigro wrote: > > > Given the amount of complexity stemming from Debian renaming this > > > binary and the fact that it breaks parts of the Node.js