[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-duplexer3_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:node-duplexer3 is NEW. binary:node-duplexer3 is NEW. source:node-duplexer3 is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-widest-line_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:node-widest-line is NEW. binary:node-widest-line is NEW. source:node-widest-line is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-duplexer3-0.1.4

On വെള്ളി 27 ജനുവരി 2017 08:57 വൈകു, Tushar Agey wrote: > I have packaged "node-duplexer3". I have made it lintian-clean and > have tested > it using sbuild. > > It is available on the repository: > > https://git.fosscommunity.in/tushar/node-duplexer3.git > > I would like to have it sponsored!

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-cli-spinners is already in Debian

node-cli-spinners is already in Debian: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-cli-spinners It is currently only in experimental, please talk to the maintainer (added in Cc) in case you require the package in unstable. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-duplexer3-0.1.4

On ശനി 28 ജനുവരി 2017 04:28 വൈകു, Tushar Agey wrote: > tests are enabled in debian/tests/control Thanks! Uploaded. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-widest-line_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes

node-widest-line_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-widest-line_1.0.0-1.dsc node-widest-line_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz node-widest-line_1.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz node-widest-line_1.0.0-1_all.deb node-widest-line_1.0.0-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings,

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-duplexer3_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes

node-duplexer3_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-duplexer3_0.1.4-1.dsc node-duplexer3_0.1.4.orig.tar.gz node-duplexer3_0.1.4-1.debian.tar.xz node-duplexer3_0.1.4-1_all.deb node-duplexer3_0.1.4-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-is-plain-obj-1.1.0

I have packaged "node-is-plain-obj" (dependency of AVA). I have made it lintian-clean and have tested it using sbuild. It is available on the repository: https://git.fosscommunity.in/tushar/node-is-plain-obj.git I would like to have it sponsored! Thank you for your valuable time! --

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] pre-spring cleaning, please advise

Quoting Ben Finney (2017-01-28 03:07:01) > Jérémy Lal writes: > > > - or having a reverse (build-)dependency, or what's the point ? > > I am very much in favour of this: node libraries should be in Debian > to provide a library that is needed for some actual program of

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] pre-spring cleaning, please advise

This is a good idea ! There is a lot of cruft, especially packages created for some obscure reason 2-3 years ago and since then abandoned both by the maintainer and by upstream, and superseded by the next cool thing in the nodejs ecosystem. I propose to extract from UDD a list of candidate

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#852923: dojo: FTBFS: OPTIMIZER FAILED: JavaException: java.lang.RuntimeException: null

Source: dojo Version: 1.11.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170128 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: found 699482 in 1.4.2-2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # just for the BTS graph > found 699482 1.4.2-2 Bug #699482 {Done: Paul Gevers } [jquery] CVE-2011-4969: jQuery 1.6.2 XSS There is no source info for the package 'jquery' at version '1.4.2-2' with architecture '' Unable to

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-widest-line-1.0.0

On വെള്ളി 27 ജനുവരി 2017 09:02 വൈകു, Tushar Agey wrote: > I have packaged "node-widest-line". I have made it lintian-clean and > have tested > it using sbuild. > > It is available on the repository: > > https://git.fosscommunity.in/tushar/node-widest-line.git > > I would like to have it

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] lots of requests to join pkg-javascript

On ശനി 28 ജനുവരി 2017 10:21 വൈകു, Ross Gammon wrote: > I was disappointed with this too. I think we should be encouraging > newcomers to place their packaging in the standard place, so we can help > them when required. The last thing we want is node-*/js packaging being > done in a different way,

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] pre-spring cleaning, please advise

2017-01-28 17:46 GMT+01:00 Ross Gammon : > On 01/28/2017 10:52 AM, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> This is a good idea ! There is a lot of cruft, especially packages created >> for some obscure reason 2-3 years ago and since then abandoned both by the >> maintainer and by

[Pkg-javascript-devel] ITP: node-hoek -- General purpose node utilities

https://git.fosscommunity.in/AkashSarda/hoek I have packaged, ran sbuild, and it is linitan error free. Please review and upload. Bug No. 850238. Yours Sincerely Akash Sarda -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] pre-spring cleaning, please advise

On 01/28/2017 10:52 AM, Paolo Greppi wrote: > This is a good idea ! There is a lot of cruft, especially packages created > for some obscure reason 2-3 years ago and since then abandoned both by the > maintainer and by upstream, and superseded by the next cool thing in the > nodejs ecosystem. >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] lots of requests to join pkg-javascript

Hi Pirate, On 01/27/2017 10:02 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Thanks to a bug in npm2deb search which does not look in experimental > and our excellent on boarding practices which prefers keeping new git > repos out of team repo in alioth, people are duplicating work, packaging > already packaged

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#853035: node-liftoff: Non-determistically FTBFS due to unreliable timing in tests

Source: node-liftoff Version: 2.3.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, node-liftoff's testsuite appears to use method

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#853036: node-liftoff: Non-determistically FTBFS due to unreliable timing in tests

Source: node-liftoff Version: 2.3.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, node-liftoff's testsuite appears to use method

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#853036: marked as done (node-liftoff: Non-determistically FTBFS due to unreliable timing in tests)

Your message dated Sun, 29 Jan 2017 07:04:56 + with message-id <1485673496.438276.863023496.78483...@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line (Closing duplicate) has caused the Debian Bug report #853036, regarding node-liftoff: Non-determistically FTBFS due to unreliable timing in tests