[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836205: should be fixed by 2.5.1-1

2017-02-07 Thread Paolo Greppi
Please note that version 2.5.1-1 should fix this issue since we updated the patch that bundles ms to ms version 0.7.2. https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/n/node-debug/changelog-2.5.1-1 https://sources.debian.net/src/node-debug/2.5.1-1/debian/patches/00-bundle_ms.diff/#L288 Paolo --

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#853035: mmmh

2017-02-07 Thread Paolo Greppi
In the log you attached this line:  [0m Error: timeout of 5000ms exceeded looks different from what you report in the bug:  [0m Error: timeout of 1ms exceeded The test suite is run by upstream (and by us) with this command: mocha -t 5000 -b -R spec

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] pre-spring cleaning, please advise

2017-01-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
This is a good idea ! There is a lot of cruft, especially packages created for some obscure reason 2-3 years ago and since then abandoned both by the maintainer and by upstream, and superseded by the next cool thing in the nodejs ecosystem. I propose to extract from UDD a list of candidate

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Fwd: Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

2017-02-18 Thread Paolo Greppi
This is interesting. Should we also keep those useless node-* packages out of stretch ? Note: useless until the actual package we need is packaged (be it browserify, yarnpkg ...). Paolo Messaggio Inoltrato Oggetto: Bug#768073: [pkg-go] Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

[Pkg-javascript-devel] 2 NMUs for node-findup-sync

2016-10-27 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi there today I pushed to mentors.d.n. two NMUs for the node-findup-sync package. The first one (0.1.3-1.1) fixes the debian/watch file and a couple of minor issues. The second one (0.4.3-0.1) picks up the latest release from upstream. Here they are:

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] 2 NMUs for node-findup-sync

2016-10-29 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 28/10/2016 15:24, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > IMHO, you could join the team if you haven't, commit your changes, and OK, I have sent a couple of commits to https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-findup-sync.git, they are the changes with higher priority (0.1.3-2). As I am not 100%

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-findup-sync is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-10-30 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 30/10/2016 05:39, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote: > node-findup-sync 0.1.3-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-12-05 > > It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: > 841698: node-lodash: FTBFS with bash as /bin/sh The issue with node-lodash can be easily fixed

[Pkg-javascript-devel] please update the Npm2Deb database about is-fullwidth-code-point

2016-11-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
The approach of patching away the dependency on is-fullwidth-code-point with node-wcwidth.js has worked with node-string-width. For this reason we have closed the ITP for node-is-fullwidth-code-point https://bugs.debian.org/842191 I believe the Npm2Deb database at

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-wrap-ansi 2.0.0

2016-11-26 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I packaged node-wrap-ansi as per this ITP https://bugs.debian.org/845262, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-wrap-ansi.git it's set up for git-buildpackage and pristine-tar. Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload.

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#794890: npm: new upstream version

2016-11-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
Jonas, I beg to slightly differ on the point below. I think of npm or yarn/yarnpkg as the equivalent for the nodejs ecosystem of python virtualenv. There are workflows where you'd want to maintain a certain configuration of a webapp, phonegap app or website using a local set of modules / pinned

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#794890: npm: new upstream version

2016-11-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
the global site-packages. Paolo On 23/11/2016 15:52, Jérémy Lal wrote: > 2016-11-23 15:45 GMT+01:00 Paolo Greppi <paolo.gre...@libpf.com>: >> On 23/11/2016 14:57, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> Npm is an *alternative* to using Debian packaged nodejs code. >>> >>> User

[Pkg-javascript-devel] enabling tests in node-chalk package

2016-11-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, While working on node-wrap-ansi (which will depend on node-chalk) I noticed that two of the missing build deps for node-chalk (require-uncached and resolve-from) are required precisely for testing, that's why the mocha line in debian/rules is commented ATM. BUT they are only required for

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-string-width 2.0.0

2016-11-22 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I packaged node-string-width as per this ITP https://bugs.debian.org/845240, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-string-width.git it's set up for git-buildpackage. Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload. Thanks,

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Using clean build scripts from pkg-ruby-extras repo

2016-11-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi this is opinionated but very useful. I have a couple of newbie questions. Did you try these scripts on Debian stable as host ? Why do we need two virtualization systems (schroot for sbuild & lxc for autopkgtest) ? Would it be possible to use only one (for example lxc) ? Paolo On 28/11/2016

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#794890: work required to update the npm package to 3.10.9

2016-11-15 Thread Paolo Greppi
Issuing the command: npm2deb depends -b -r npm > list on sid returns the attached list of node-* dependencies. Filtering the list with: cat list | grep None | sed 's/│//g' | sed 's/├//g' | sed 's/─//g' | sed 's/└//g' | sed 's/^ *//g' | awk '{print $1}' | sort | uniq | wc gives the

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] 2 NMUs for node-findup-sync

2016-11-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
That's a very helpful overview, and it makes it clear that it's quite a lot of work. Going through the latest news and the WNPP queue I can see that: - node-detect-file has been ACCEPTED into unstable this morning - node-cache-base has been ACCEPTED into unstable yesterday - node-os-homedir has

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] 2 NMUs for node-findup-sync

2016-11-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
tps://packages.qa.debian.org/n/node-findup-sync.html whereas the redirect works on: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-findup-sync Probably we're all on the bleeding edge (tracker.d.o) but people who click on the Developer Information (PTS) link on packages.d.o still land on packages.qa.

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] how to address node-lodash 841698

2016-11-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 02/11/2016 14:36, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Wednesday 02 November 2016 04:11 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> Fine, can you review what I have done so far and if it's OK sponsor it ? >> >> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-lodash.git/log/?h=debian/master-2.4

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] how to address node-lodash 841698

2016-11-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 02/11/2016 10:42, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Wednesday 02 November 2016 01:46 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> For this one it seems the master branch has some commits targeting >> experimental (4.3.0+dfsg-1 and 3.9.3+dfsg-1) that have not made it to to >> sid yet: >> htt

[Pkg-javascript-devel] alternatives for node.js dependency management

2016-11-03 Thread Paolo Greppi
Post by the python-flask author on "Micropackages and Open Source Trust Scaling" (2016-03-24) http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2016/3/24/open-source-trust-scaling/ node-isarray installed size on sid: 16 kB https://packages.debian.org/sid/node-isarray RFP for yarn: a fast, reliable, and secure package

[Pkg-javascript-devel] dependencies for complex Node.js modules: findup-sync

2016-11-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
Starting a separate thread from https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2016-November/014868.html ... On 01/11/2016 10:56, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Tuesday 01 November 2016 03:09 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> ... >> It would be helpful to (programmatica

[Pkg-javascript-devel] dependencies for complex Node.js modules: findup-sync

2016-11-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
Starting a separate thread from https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2016-November/014868.html ... On 01/11/2016 10:56, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Tuesday 01 November 2016 03:09 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> ... >> It would be helpful to (programmatica

[Pkg-javascript-devel] how to address node-lodash 841698

2016-11-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi I would like to contribute to this bug. The current package version in unstable is 2.4.1+dfsg-3. If I understand correctly https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_does_.2BIBw-dfsg.2BIB0_in_the_version_string_mean.3F, we would issue the 2.4.1+dfsg-4 version. I have cloned the repo

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] how to address node-lodash 841698

2016-11-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 02/11/2016 08:45, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Wednesday 02 November 2016 01:09 AM, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> Any comments ? > > You can just work on the master branch. We do all the work targeting sid > on master branch. For this one it seems the master branch has some

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-loose-envify: source-is-missing

2016-11-29 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, while packaging node-loose-envify (https://bugs.debian.org/846206) I get this lintian error: E: node-loose-envify source: source-is-missing test/react/react-with-addons-with-node_env.js line length is 845 characters (>512) See the repo on alioth. Since the tests require browserify, I guess

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-loose-envify 1.3.0

2016-12-09 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 05/12/2016 11:41, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On തിങ്കള്‍ 05 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:45 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> It does the trick because the lintian error is gone. > > But its bad for long term maintenance, any time that file changes, > you'll have to refresh the patch. >&g

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-loose-envify 1.3.0

2016-12-09 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 05/12/2016 11:46, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On തിങ്കള്‍ 05 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 04:07 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> Add this to debian/watch params: >> repacksuffix=~dfsg > > I think +dfsg is better here, else any module depending on it has to add > a ~ at the end to its version. May be we make npm2deb do

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

2016-12-09 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 04/12/2016 10:06, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ഞായര്‍ 04 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:18 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> It should be low risk to upgrade because the command: >> apt-cache rdepends node-bl >> >> returns: >> >> node-bl >> Reverse Depends: >>

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-bl_1.1.2-1_amd64.changes

2016-12-09 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 09/12/2016 09:19, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On വെള്ളി 09 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 01:29 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> Nothing ! >> My key has expired, i renewed it as explained here: >> https://keyring.debian.org/ >> but it's not updated immediately by "ftp masters" - i don't think it has to >> be available in

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-bl_1.1.2-1_amd64.changes

2016-12-08 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi all this does not seem to get through. The new version does not come up here: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-bl What did I do wrong ? Paolo On 08/12/2016 18:19, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > node-bl_1.1.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost > along with the files: >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-object-path 0.11.3

2016-12-12 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi I packaged node-object-path as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/846215, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-object-path.git Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload. Thanks, Paolo -- Pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#847091: update node-extend to latest upstream release

2016-12-14 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 05/12/2016 15:44, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On തിങ്കള്‍ 05 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 08:08 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> Do you mean node-xtend ? > > I think we missed avoiding duplication here (today I saw npm2deb warns > about it, though node-xtend was uploaded by someone else). > > $ apt-cache policy

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Removing myself from Uploaders: field...

2016-12-14 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 14/12/2016 16:26, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Hi all, > > some time ago, I had the initiative of getting etherpad-lite into > Debian. This goal is still not easily reachable. For now, I'd rather > remove myself as uploader from the various JS packages I uploaded. Some > have already been taken by

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-dom{handler,utils,-serializer}

2016-12-16 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi I packed for upload: - node-domhandler https://bugs.debian.org/848322 - node-domutils https://bugs.debian.org/848324 - node-dom-serializer https://bugs.debian.org/848325 They are all related to: https://bugs.debian.org/794988 Please someone more experienced than me review them and if

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-has-binary 0.1.7

2016-12-16 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi based on the work of Bas Couwenberg (2015) I prepared for upload node-has-binary as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/781486, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-has-binary.git/ It is required for node-socket.io-client, which in turn is required for

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-emoji 1.4.1

2016-12-12 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 03/12/2016 16:49, Paolo Greppi wrote: > On 03/12/2016 06:57, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> On ശനി 03 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 06:46 രാവിലെ, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>> Bad move :) >>> What if a module is named "emoji" ? Then you'll have node-emoji >>> conflict with

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-path-root 0.1.1

2016-12-12 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi I packaged node-path-root as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/847910, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-path-root.git/ The debian/watch file is using fakeupstream at the moment, but I've asked upstream to tag the release:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-roadrunner 1.1.0

2016-12-12 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi I packaged node-object-path as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/846218, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-roadrunner.git/ Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload. Thanks, Paolo -- Pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-path-root 0.1.1

2016-12-12 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 12/12/2016 15:00, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On തിങ്കള്‍ 12 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 06:05 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> on that file and they all pass. If we manage to point debian/watch to >> github, we can easily turn on tests. > > You can include the test as a patch. When they ad

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-parse-filepath 1.0.1

2016-12-13 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 13/12/2016 18:02, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ചൊവ്വ 13 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 10:01 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> Hi >> >> I packaged node-parse-filepath as per this ITP: >> https://bugs.debian.org/847911, this is the repo: >> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-parse-filepath 1.0.1

2016-12-13 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi I packaged node-parse-filepath as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/847911, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-parse-filepath.git/ I patched away the dependency on is-absolute with node-path-is-absolute. Please someone more experienced than me review it

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-parse-filepath 1.0.1

2016-12-13 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 13/12/2016 19:14, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ചൊവ്വ 13 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 10:57 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> My next one is node-fined. It's ready on alioth, I can test here if I >> install node-parse-filepath and node-lodash-packages with dpkg -i (and >> everything seems fine

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#847091: Bug#847091: Bug#847091: update node-extend to latest upstream release

2016-12-14 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 14/12/2016 10:55, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 14 2:16:46 PM IST, Paolo Greppi <paolo.gre...@libpf.com> > wrote: >> That's because also node-liftoff (which is my ITP pipeline after >> node-fixed) depends on node-extend >= 3.0.0 >>

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#847091: Bug#847091: update node-extend to latest upstream release

2016-12-14 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 14/12/2016 10:53, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 14 2:16:46 PM IST, Paolo Greppi <paolo.gre...@libpf.com> > wrote: >> >> Assuming we want to keep node-xtend and node-extend separate, I have >> prepared the update for this one in the alioth

[Pkg-javascript-devel] why not

2016-12-14 Thread Paolo Greppi
I'd like to give this one a try, in the framework of the Debian Javascript Maintainers team. The new repo will be here (many thanks to Mike Gabriel for sharing his previous work): https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/etherpad-lite.git My current count of missing node-* packages is 9: -

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-retry 0.10.1

2016-12-14 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi once I had upstream tag it, I updated node-retry to 0.10.1. node-retry > 0.10.0 is required for node-proper-lockfile which I have in my ITP pipeline because in turn it's required for node-yarnpkg Since I do not have access to collab-maint I used this repo:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-node-uid-safe 2.1.3

2016-12-15 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi based on the work of Leo Iannacone (2014) I updated & packaged node-path-root as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/754574, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-uid-safe.git/ This is a dependency of node-express-session which is required for etherpad-lite

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-node-uid-safe 2.1.3

2016-12-15 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 15/12/2016 14:10, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi > > based on the work of Leo Iannacone (2014) I updated & packaged > node-path-root as per this ITP: > https://bugs.debian.org/754574, this is the repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-uid-safe.git/ >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] why not

2016-12-15 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 15/12/2016 11:59, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > On Mi 14 Dez 2016 23:01:16 CET, Paolo Greppi wrote: > >> I'd like to give this one a try, in the framework of the Debian >> Javascript Maintainers team. >> >> The new repo will be here (many th

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-blob 0.0.4

2016-12-15 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi based on the work of Bas Couwenberg (2015) I prepared for upload node-blob as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/781478, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-blob.git/ node-blob is required for node-engine.io-parser (#781458), which in turn is required for

[Pkg-javascript-devel] advice needed on node module rx

2016-12-16 Thread Paolo Greppi
https://www.npmjs.com/package/rx its description reads "Library for composing asynchronous and event-based operations in JavaScript" should the source package be named rx.js or node-rx ? could one source provide binaries libjs-rx and node-rx ? Paolo P.S. it's a dependency of node-inquirer

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-retry 0.10.0

2016-12-12 Thread Paolo Greppi
According to npm registry node-retry should be at version 0.10.0: https://www.npmjs.com/package/retry#changelog whereas we're at 0.6.0 uscan fails but there is no tag anyway for 0.10.0 in github: https://github.com/tim-kos/node-retry/tags I've notified upstream of the missing tag:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] ITPs related to gulp

2016-12-12 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi team just to make you aware that to help with gulp packaging I just filed the ITPs for node-liftoff and some of its dependencies: http://bugs.debian.org/847910 ITP: node-path-root -- Get the root of a posix or windows filepath http://bugs.debian.org/847911 ITP: node-parse-filepath -- parses

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-loose-envify 1.3.0

2016-12-11 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 10/12/2016 08:39, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ശനി 10 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:55 രാവിലെ, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> BTW Pirate, what do you mean with "If you get it working, may be add it >> to a wiki page." ? > > Document steps to create a dfsg version in wiki,debian.org s

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-htmlparser2 3.9.2

2017-01-11 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 11/01/2017 15:54, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ചൊവ്വ 03 ജനുവരി 2017 07:26 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> On 28/12/2016 18:15, Paolo Greppi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> since node-cheerio (https://bugs.debian.org/848315) which is a requirement >>> of etherpa

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-htmlparser2 3.9.2

2017-01-11 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 11/01/2017 17:30, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Paolo Greppi wrote: >> I think you are looking at the old repo here: >> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-htmlparser2.git >> >> The repo I created has all the branches / tags: >> https://anonscm.d

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-end-of-stream 1.1.0

2016-12-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 02/12/2016 17:51, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On വെള്ളി 02 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 04:26 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> oops ! >> >> git push --all && git push --tags >> > > Its failing to build on a clean chroot. > > Error: Cannot find module 'once' >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-detect-indent 5.0.0

2016-12-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I packaged node-detect-indent as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/846204, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-detect-indent.git Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload. Thanks, Paolo -- Pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-loose-envify 1.3.0

2016-12-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I packaged node-loose-envify as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/846206, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-loose-envify.git Two notes - regarding the source-is-missing error mentioned here

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-emoji 1.4.1

2016-12-03 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 03/12/2016 06:57, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ശനി 03 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 06:46 രാവിലെ, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> Bad move :) >> What if a module is named "emoji" ? Then you'll have node-emoji >> conflict with it. >> node-node-emoji is the right name here. > > I think this is over engineering. We add node-

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

2016-12-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
OK BTW on this one when I tried to reopen the ITP #753287 the BTS replied "nope, the bug is archived!" So what is best here ? To unarchive it or to open a new one ? Paolo On 02/12/2016 09:19, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ചൊവ്വ 29 നവംബര്‍ 2016 06:37 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >>

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] enabling tests on node-cliui

2016-12-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 02/12/2016 10:13, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Please don't top-post. > >> On 29/11/2016 13:59, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>> 2016-11-29 13:24 GMT+01:00 Paolo Greppi <paolo.gre...@libpf.com>: >>>> Since chai is in Debian I have re-enabled the original tests in >&

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-end-of-stream 1.1.0

2016-12-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I resumed work on node-end-of-stream as per this old ITP (which I unarchived, reopened and reassigned): https://bugs.debian.org/753250, This is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-end-of-stream.git Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] enabling tests on node-cliui

2016-12-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
its upload ? Paolo On 29/11/2016 13:59, Jérémy Lal wrote: > 2016-11-29 13:24 GMT+01:00 Paolo Greppi <paolo.gre...@libpf.com>: >> Since chai is in Debian I have re-enabled the original tests in >> node-cliui, there is one failing and 23 passing: >> >> 1) cliui la

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-end-of-stream 1.1.0

2016-12-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 02/12/2016 11:54, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On വെള്ളി 02 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:28 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I resumed work on node-end-of-stream as per this old ITP (which I >> unarchived, reopened and reassigned): https://bugs.debian.org/753250, &g

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-string.prototype.codepointat 0.2.0

2016-12-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
I've done that. The tests are silent, when run with: nodejs test/test.js when run with: mocha test/test.js it says "0 passing" probably because upstream did not use the describe... it ... syntax Paolo On 02/12/2016 07:08, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ചൊവ്വ 29 നവംബര്‍ 2016 06:3

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

2016-12-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 02/12/2016 10:12, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 2 2:36:04 PM IST, Paolo Greppi <paolo.gre...@libpf.com> wrote: >> OK BTW on this one when I tried to reopen the ITP #753287 the BTS >> replied "nope, the bug is archived!" >> >>

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-emoji 1.4.1

2016-12-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I packaged node-emoji as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/846212, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-emoji.git The package name was proposed by npm2deb as node-node-emoji but I like node-emoji better (do we have a policy for that BTW ?). Changing from

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

2016-12-04 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 03/12/2016 17:59, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On വെള്ളി 02 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:30 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> I guess we can put this one on hold and wait for node-end-of-stream so >> that tests can be enabled as well. > > node-end-of-stream is in the archive, but pristin

[Pkg-javascript-devel] enabling tests on node-cliui

2016-11-29 Thread Paolo Greppi
Since chai is in Debian I have re-enabled the original tests in node-cliui, there is one failing and 23 passing: 1) cliui layoutDSL ignores ansi escape codes when measuring padding: AssertionError: expected [ Array(5) ] to deeply equal [ Array(5) ] + expected - actual "

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-death 1.0.0

2016-11-29 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I packaged node-death as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/846202, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-death.git Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload. Thanks, Paolo signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

2016-11-29 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I resumed work on node-tar-stream as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/753287, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-tar-stream.git Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload. This is required for node-yarnpkg

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-string.prototype.codepointat 0.2.0

2016-11-29 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I packaged node-string.prototype.codepointat as per this ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/846213, this is the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-string.prototype.codepointat.git Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload. Thanks,

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-bl 1.1.2

2016-12-04 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I updated node-bl from version 0.9.3 to 1.1.2 on alioth: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-bl.git/ This version is required for node-tar-stream (which depends on bl ^1.0.0); node-tar-stream is in turn required for node-yarnpkg (https://bugs.debian.org/843021). Please

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-loose-envify 1.3.0

2016-12-05 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 03/12/2016 01:33, Jérémy Lal wrote: > 2016-12-03 1:02 GMT+01:00 Paolo Greppi <paolo.gre...@libpf.com>: >> Hi, >> >> I packaged node-loose-envify as per this ITP: >> https://bugs.debian.org/846206, this is the repo: >> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-jav

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-loose-envify 1.3.0

2016-12-05 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 05/12/2016 11:41, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On തിങ്കള്‍ 05 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:45 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> It does the trick because the lintian error is gone. > > But its bad for long term maintenance, any time that file changes, > you'll have to refresh the patch. >&g

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#845227: trying my JS skills

2016-12-05 Thread Paolo Greppi
I am not sure what you want to achieve (and I ignore the intent of upstream) but I noticed that the build-modules.js script looks at the last argument in the command line to select the target it should copy the files to so for example if I create a directory: mkdir dist/q then passing this as

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-bl 1.1.2

2016-12-04 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 04/12/2016 18:39, Jérémy Lal wrote: > 2016-12-04 15:27 GMT+01:00 Paolo Greppi <paolo.gre...@libpf.com>: >> Hi, >> >> I updated node-bl from version 0.9.3 to 1.1.2 on alioth: >> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-bl.git/ >> >> This v

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#848749: disable build-time tests

2016-12-19 Thread Paolo Greppi
Il looks like node-expand-tilde returns a directory which does not exist (sbuild-nonexistent) at this line in node-fined/test/utils/get-userhome-file.js: var userHomeDir = expandTilde('~'); This in turn triggers the exception in the next line: var userHomeFiles = fs.readdirSync(userHomeDir);

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: tinycon.js 0.6.5

2016-12-21 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I have packaged tinycon.js, see the ITP I am CC-ing and the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/tinycon.js.git This is a requirement of etherpad-lite (https://bugs.debian.org/576998). Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload.

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] grunt-contrib-uglify and grunt-contrib-copy

2016-12-21 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 21/12/2016 08:19, Paolo Greppi wrote: > On 20/12/2016 03:41, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> On ചൊവ്വ 20 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 12:15 രാവിലെ, Paolo Greppi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> while packaging node-rx and trying to build it with grunt, I noticed >>> that apar

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-grunt-contrib-uglify 2.0.0

2016-12-20 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I have packaged node-grunt-contrib-uglify, see the ITP I am CC-ing and the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-grunt-contrib-uglify.git I had to repackage to get rid of uglyfied files part of the test suite. Therefore I can not not run tests during build or autopkgtests

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] grunt-contrib-uglify and grunt-contrib-copy

2016-12-20 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 20/12/2016 03:41, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ചൊവ്വ 20 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 12:15 രാവിലെ, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> while packaging node-rx and trying to build it with grunt, I noticed >> that apart from a number of non-relevant grunt add-ons related to >> lint

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-jsonminify 0.4.1

2016-12-21 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I have packaged node-jsonminify, see the ITP I am CC-ing and the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-jsonminify.git Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload. Thanks, Paolo -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-proper-lockfile 2.0.0

2016-12-18 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 18/12/2016 12:01, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On വെള്ളി 16 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 09:28 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> The repo on alioth is ready: >> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-proper-lockfile.git >> >> For the version dependency on node-retry >= 0.10.0,

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-external-editor 2.0.1

2016-12-19 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I have packaged node-external-editor, see the ITP I am CC-ing and the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-external-editor.git/ I had to cheat on the dependency on node-tmp: the package.json requests 0.0.31 but with 0.0.28 that we have in debian the tests pass .. Please

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-is-promise 2.1.0

2016-12-19 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I have packaged node-is-promise, see the ITP I am CC-ing and the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-is-promise.git/ Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload. Thanks, Paolo -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#848749: set a different $HOME for build-time tests

2016-12-19 Thread Paolo Greppi
As per this comment in the Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list: https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2016-December/016725.html I have changed the approach to set a different $HOME for build-time tests. This should fix the build-time tests. Paolo -- Pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#848749: disable build-time tests

2016-12-20 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 20/12/2016 07:41, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ചൊവ്വ 20 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 12:03 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> Il looks like node-expand-tilde returns a directory which does not exist >> (sbuild-nonexistent) at this line in >> node-fined/test/utils/get-userhome-file.js: >> va

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Re: Help needed on rollup

2016-12-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 23/12/2016 07:16, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ചൊവ്വ 20 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:33 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> yes, in theory. In practice, babel-cli has a long chain of dependencies. >> https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Tasks/babel-cli > > babel-cli is mostly complete, but it needs lerna

[Pkg-javascript-devel] status of node-inquirer

2016-12-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, the repo on alioth is up to date and builds fine if you install locally all the dependencies missing to date. These are on the way: name ITPRFS / NEW - cli-width (^2.0.0) 849141 NEW today - restore-cursor (^1.0.1) 849145 NEW today - run-async (^2.2.0)

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-read 1.0.7

2016-12-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I have updated node-read from 1.0.5 to 1.0.7. Version 1.0.7 is required for node-yarnpkg 0.18 I also added build-time / autopkg tests, and the license changed from BSD to Expat. There is 1 reverse dependency: npm (!), without tests. It proved impossible to run the supplied test suite

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-bytes 2.4.0

2016-12-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I have updated node-bytes from 2.1.0 to 2.4.0 and moved its repo from collab-maint to pkg-javascript. Version 2.4.0 is required for node-yarnpkg 0.18 There are 3 reverse dependencies: - node-body-parser - node-compression - node-raw-body I have launched the autopkgtests for those and their

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFSx4

2016-12-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
- node-array-from https://bugs.debian.org/849178 pkg-javascript/node-array-from.git - node-pad https://bugs.debian.org/849182 pkg-javascript/node-pad.git - node-progress https://bugs.debian.org/849181 pkg-javascript/node-progress.git - node-sorted-object https://bugs.debian.org/849179

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-mute-stream 0.0.7

2016-12-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 23/12/2016 17:11, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On വെള്ളി 23 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 06:25 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have updated node-mute-stream from 0.0.4 to 0.0.7. >> >> Version 0.0.6 is required to install node-inquirer. >> >> I also added build-

[Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-cli-cursor 1.0.2

2016-12-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I have packaged node-cli-cursor, see the ITP I am CC-ing and the repo: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-cli-cursor.git Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor its upload. Thanks, Paolo -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-sorted-object_2.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-12-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 24/12/2016 00:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > please mention the double license of this software in your debian/copyright. > > Thanks! > Thorsten So I have added the WTFPL-2 too, a quite popular license: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=path%3Adebian%2Fcopyright+WTFPL

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-rx_4.1.0+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-12-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 24/12/2016 00:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > Microsoft claims copyright for some files ... > > Thorsten I have attributed the copyright to Microsoft Corporation. Fixed without increasing the version + tag deleted. Please sponsor again the upload. Paolo --

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#794988: the domhandler dependency

2016-12-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 16/12/2016 11:29, Paolo Greppi wrote: > I got the same while testing node-cheerio (ITP: > https://bugs.debian.org/848315). > > The domhandler dependency is indeed listed in the current upstream's > package.json. > > Upgrading node-htmlparser2 from 3.7.3 to 3.9.2 woul

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#849557: Bug#849557: switch to node-uglify instead of yui-compressor

2016-12-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 28/12/2016 17:30, Pirate Praveen wrote: > 2016-12-28 21:32 या दिवशी Pirate Praveen ने लिहीले : >> yui-compressor pulls in jre. Since nodejs is already a build dep, its >> better to use node-uglify. > > On a closer look, yui-compressor is used only for minifying css. To replace > it, we should

  1   2   >