Hi Daniel,
your debian/copyright says that this package is GPLv2, but
according to COPYING it should be GPLv2+.
Maybe you can correct this in one of the next uploads.
Thanks!
Thorsten
PS same in drupal7-mod-jssip
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing
Dear Balint,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
The file node-iscroll-5.1.1/demos/minimap/ermine.jpg does contain a
copyright statement [1] but no license. So it seems that this file might
not be distributed, at least an entry in debian/copyright is missing.
Further lots of images
Dear Maintainer,
your package depends on node-lodash. Can you please tell me where I can
find this package?
Thanks!
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
The directory vendor contains several modules with licenses that are
not mentioned in debian/copyright. It would be nice if you also add the
different copyright holders of these modules.
You might also take care of:
W: libjs-lodash:
Package: node-lodash
Version: 2.4.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: alteh...@debian.org
Usertags: ftp
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
thanks
Dear Maintainer,
please mention the AFL of vendor/dojo/* in debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi Leo,
I marked your package for accept, but isn't your entry for
node_modules/ee-first/* in debian/copyright superfluous?
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Andrew,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
The license in LICENSE does not match the license you use in
your debian/copyright.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address
Hi Andrew,
danse.ogg seems to be created by Kevin MacLeod. Normally he licenses his
stuff under CC BY. Can you please confirm that he is the author and then
add an entry to debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
license for danse.ogg is missing, new version is on its way to NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel
Dear Maintainer,
wouldn't it be possible to create a bigger node-time package?
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Dear Maintainer,
this package should be also better part of a bigger one.
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
rejecting this small package for now and waiting for a bigger bunch
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel
rejecting this small package for now and waiting for a bigger bunch
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel
rejecting this small package for now and waiting for a bigger bunch
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel
according to Andrew not needed anymore
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Dear Maintainer,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please add the missing license of src/lang-matlab.js to your debian/copyright.
Please also add the other copyright holders (e.g. Onno Hommes, Google Inc.,
Andrew Allen, ...).
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to
Dear Maintainer,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please add the missing license of:
build\scripts\nwpacker.js
test\jquery\qunit\testrunner.js
test\jsvm\load_test.js
to your debian/copyright. You might also want to update the list of
copyright holders of different files.
Hi Leo,
will there be a package node-uid-safe?
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Hi Thomas,
I marked your package for accept, but you might want to add some more
copryright holders of test/* to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
... same here.
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
... oh, come on, this time it is external/*
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Hi Thomas,
I am afraid this package needs a reject.
The license of
example/www/jquery.js
example/www/text.js
is missing in your debian/copyright.
Maybe you can also take care of some lintian warnings:
W: libjs-require-css: macos-ds-store-file-in-package
Hi Thomas,
accepted, but there is room for improvement:
W: libjs-angularjs-smart-table: wrong-bug-number-in-closes l3:#XX
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Bas,
I marked your package for accept, but you might want to add Pivotal Labs
as copyright holder for jasmine.
Thanks!
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
there seems to be no node-uid-safe available, so I reject this package for now.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Bas,
I'm reluctantly looking into this issue further, but I need to know what
requirements an Node.js module must meet to be eligible for its own
source package.
What are your requirements for this?
from my point of view only the size of the binary package (excluding
/usr/share/doc and
Hi Daniel,
this package seems to be another candidate for a small-package-reject.
Can't you merge this stuff into another package?
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Bas,
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Thanks for finally rejecting packages too small to meet the criteria.
What about node-nextback?
I didn't want to spoil your weekend, so I started with only two packages.
It's probably better to reject all remaining Node.js packages
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
As there is no acceptable solution for bundling small Node.js packages,
Bas requested to remove all OpenLayer 3 packages for now ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
Hi Julien,
I marked your package for accept, but you should add the copyright holder
of backbone.js to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Julien,
according to README.md the documentation is under CC BY 3.0.
So please add this to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
this has the same problem as node-isarray ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing
Hi,
as it makes no sense to let this package rot in NEW, I am going to reject it
now.
Only 120 bytes of content are not enough for a separate package.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Can you please also change the debhelper version to 9?
I'm curious to know the reason if you have one.
No, I don't have a reason, it is just the latest one and if you are
at changing something ...
Hi,
as you might have noticed I uploaded some packages, that are dependencies
mentioned on the tasks pages.
Now I found some packages that have a version in package.json, which does
not have a corresponding tag on github. What is the best way to handle
such packages?
Ask upstream to create
Hi Julien,
please add test/testharness*.js to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
as requested by email
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Mike Gabriel wrote:
With this patch npm2deb is able to work with such repositoies.
If you do something like (the -b is new):
./npm2deb.py create -b hashish
it will create a different debian/watch file (just saying that you can not
use uscan to get a new version), it will
Package: npm2deb
Version: 0.2.5-1
Severity: whishlist
Tags: patch
thanks
Hi Leo,
as you know, not every developer of npm modules does release a tarball for
new versions. Some of them commit something to github and just put the new
version in their package.json.
With this patch npm2deb is
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
this package FTBFS in a similar way in jessie:
yes, version 3.0.0-2 works on Jessie but FTBFS on Sid and 3.0.0-3 works
on Sid but fails on Jessie. I think there has been some change in
coffeescript...
Thorsten
Hi,
I am trying to put node-mocks-http into stretch. Unfortunately it depends
on node-type-is, which does not migrate to testing due to node-mime-types,
which FTBFS.
Does anybody mind if I do some cleanup and upload new versions of node-*
packages or at least take care of FTBFSs?
The linked logfile does not look that bad, at least it does not contain
the error from the report!?
So this bug could be closed, right?
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
bad Recommends:
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi Jeremy,
your package Recommends: node-pkg-tar
Do you want to upload that as well?
Thorsten
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Dominik,
please mention test/* in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi Sergio,
I marked your package for accept, but please mention all authors of files
in test/* in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Thomas,
please add a list of files to each license block and not just one file.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing
Hi Ivan,
please mention all licenses/copyright information in your debian/copyright.
For example libjs-tv4-1.2.7+dfsg1/component.json mentions MIT,
libjs-tv4-1.2.7+dfsg1/try/ace/theme-tomorrow.js and others are under BSD3,
libjs-tv4-1.2.7+dfsg1/try/ace/mode-rdoc.js and others are under AGPL-3
Hi,
please mention:
JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/site/css/droid_sans.tt
JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/site/js/showdown.js
JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/site/index.html:
"license":
as requested by email
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Sruthi Chandran wrote:
I have updated node-lodash to 4.16.6 and pushed to Alioth.
Please review and upload.
is there someone already working on this?
Thorsten
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
please take care of all FIX_MEs.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi,
please take care of all FIX_MEs in debian/*
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi,
please mention TJ Holowaychuk in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi,
to-fast-properties-1.0.2/license seems to contain a different person than your
debian/coypright.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Hi,
this doesn't work, does it?
W: node-window-size: unusual-interpreter usr/lib/nodejs/window-size/cli.js
#!node
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Hi,
please take care of all FIX_MEs in debian/*.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
almost done: Andrei Mackenzie is missing ...
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Ok, I uploaded the version and hopefully didn't break anything.
Thorsten
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Sruthi Chandran wrote:
I have updated node-lodash to 4.16.6 and pushed to Alioth.
Please review and upload.
is there someone already working
Hi,
according to
https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt/issues/1478
and an entry in the CHANGELOG, the copyright holder is no longer Ben
but the jQuery Foundation. So please update your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand
Hi,
please mention snapdragon-0.8.1/lib/source-maps.js in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please mention at least package/runtime.js in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
I marked the package for accept, but when you mention src/rm.js, you
should also mention src/cp.js in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
please mention the CC 3.0 license of some jpegs that are referenced from
jquery-ui-1.12.1/demos/tooltip/custom-content.html
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address
Hi,
unfortunately I have to reject your package. There should be no
code in the description.
Please have a look at paragraph 3.4 of the Debian policy[1] and
improve the wording of the synopsis and the long description in
your debian/control. Please also pay attention to footnote 9 of
that
Hi,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please have a look at paragraph 3.4 of the Debian policy[1] and
improve the wording of the synopsis and the long description in
your debian/control. Please also pay attention to footnote 9 of
that chapter[2].
While you are at it, chapter
Hi,
I assume that your Build-depends: of uglifyjs is just a type.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi,
please mention the license of browser/* in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please have a look at paragraph 3.4 of the Debian policy[1] and
improve the wording of the synopsis and the long description in
your debian/control. Please also pay attention to footnote 9 of
that chapter[2].
While you are at it, chapter
Hi,
unfortunately I have to reject your package. There should be no
code in the description.
Please have a look at paragraph 3.4 of the Debian policy[1] and
improve the wording of the synopsis and the long description in
your debian/control. Please also pay attention to footnote 9 of
that
Hi,
unfortunately I have to reject your package. Examples should not
be placed in the synopsis.
Please have a look at paragraph 3.4 of the Debian policy[1] and
improve the wording of the synopsis and the long description in
your debian/control. Please also pay attention to footnote 9 of
that
Hi,
please mention all copyright holders in your debian/copyright and
rework your description in debian/control.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Hi,
please mention all copyright holders in your debian/copyright and
rework your description in debian/control.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Hi,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please have a look at paragraph 3.4 of the Debian policy[1] and
improve the wording of the synopsis and the long description in
your debian/control. Please also pay attention to footnote 9 of
that chapter[2].
While you are at it, chapter
maintainer address bounces ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
please mention:
"All the documentation is covered by the CC0 license *(do whatever you want
with it - public domain)*."
in your debian/coypright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new
Hi Paolo,
Microsoft claims copyright for some files ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi Paolo,
please mention the double license of this software in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel
Hi Paolo,
there seem to be some copyright holder missing in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing
Hi Paolo,
please mention Ben Alman as copyright holder in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing
Hi Paolo,
README.md and minify.json.js mention a Kyle Simpson, so he should appear
mentioned in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
Hi,
this package depends on acorn. Will that be uploaded soon?
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Hi Bastien,
in case colingo and raynos are not the same person, than colingo should
be also mentioned in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
Hi,
there seems to be another dependency missing: node-babel-types (>=6.19.0)
Thorsten
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo