[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#684828: backbone: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libnode-uglify
reopen 684828 thanks On 25/08/12 at 19:11 -0400, David Prévot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Lucas, QA contributors, Le 14/08/2012 03:18, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : Source: backbone […] Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. […] The following packages have unmet dependencies: sbuild-build-depends-backbone-dummy : Depends: libnode-uglify but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. apt-get failed. Actually its an OR dependency: libnode-uglify | yui-compressor The package builds fine in a Wheezy amd64 pbuilder chroot (pulling yui-compressor), thus closing the bug. I just wanted to put some light on this issue: maybe the resolver used to perform the archive rebuild could be improved to avoid this kind of false positive. Hi, By default, sbuild ignores alternative build-dependencies (a | b) and only uses the first package. that is to ensure reproducible builds, and avoid situations where packages build against different b-deps on different architectures. So the bug is valid, and should be fixed in wheezy (and I'm not aware of the release team considering those failures non-RC). I've tagged a few FTBFS on wheezy as unreproducible (because I didn't investigate why it failed ten days ago, or because I couldn't find an obvious reason), should I simply have closed them? Did you Cc me? I have very little time for Debian recently, but try to keep up with bugmail where I'm Cced. Anyway, a good way to make progress is usually to provide a build log, and a diff between my log and your log. Lucas ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#684828: backbone: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libnode-uglify
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 26/08/2012 13:28, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : On 25/08/12 at 19:11 -0400, David Prévot wrote: Le 14/08/2012 03:18, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : Source: backbone […] Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Actually its an OR dependency: libnode-uglify | yui-compressor By default, sbuild ignores alternative build-dependencies (a | b) Thanks for your quick answer, and thanks Jonas who was even quicker, preparing a t-p-u right now. I've tagged a few FTBFS on wheezy as unreproducible (because I didn't investigate why it failed ten days ago, or because I couldn't find an obvious reason), should I simply have closed them? Did you Cc me? I have very little time for Debian recently, but try to keep up with bugmail where I'm Cced. No, sorry about that, those were #684833, #684837 and #684860. Cédric already looked at the last one with the same result than me, and should investigate again soon. Anyway, a good way to make progress is usually to provide a build log, and a diff between my log and your log. Thanks for the tip, I'll try to have a second look at the first two, following your advice. Regards David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQOo3JAAoJELgqIXr9/gnyrVkP/32pdMvSu4gA/AfDJp4pbAOR fVt+HlLO5O2+D2h/Ed/VfGHWITMPRqG7VdTOUQ8YBvpm0Ctoe0ipvhWS4n+BrdVM Q04qxw1knE5fmLtJXYZ/relOjjnWzF16MWSq8Nzpx4iszxP3wL4eEHCsdxCOF3e1 xNlO0qQ7XYxGAZFRHnJVYB9ZGg3cu3B5qelTfWMgilYMpp9ZUI86kk4QP/QTv80c te7eyqcDz9qCRVNMrpqx7kUO3Lah7RgBnk0ItE6SvwLVsN1xetbLScshq5LGipZY aACgYwyk9Uqw7Y0ym+ctmkEDpQORaGLLu54wqBb3gJR3j69VvE0wVRXB+DOUb9Zs A0Mffv/lx4q7sZU/Cw0cMrvePSZgVhltUr2g2fgGSQTGgkltZKeKdmlH7hc8edAC hKOD9jUvKk82RgHy1NlixVcDEAKCRq/cGLIyPgEqrELD+h53dfmnj9N33SMscYNN IFdE6has0hrkp6hopIM91kB87BXo8jPKX1hTcAjGedpInGSML7j8YmpT6wm2/6R0 1M26a/rIgXPpsiriyAF5egR+K/Sh1SOEAyXhSpwZKxi9RXRtEQizFgDs3szaoy/d hNa4pJVviUXXDZMmgn38eoKrEd+CQijx9qYH970AnNQNpfNjDocxuP3NMdLYzqag COxnURVsi8VaTXUuHgk3 =+M7/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#684828: backbone: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libnode-uglify
On 26/08/12 at 16:57 -0400, David Prévot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 26/08/2012 13:28, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : On 25/08/12 at 19:11 -0400, David Prévot wrote: Le 14/08/2012 03:18, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : Source: backbone […] Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Actually its an OR dependency: libnode-uglify | yui-compressor By default, sbuild ignores alternative build-dependencies (a | b) Thanks for your quick answer, and thanks Jonas who was even quicker, preparing a t-p-u right now. I've tagged a few FTBFS on wheezy as unreproducible (because I didn't investigate why it failed ten days ago, or because I couldn't find an obvious reason), should I simply have closed them? Did you Cc me? I have very little time for Debian recently, but try to keep up with bugmail where I'm Cced. No, sorry about that, those were #684833, #684837 and #684860. Cédric already looked at the last one with the same result than me, and should investigate again soon. Anyway, a good way to make progress is usually to provide a build log, and a diff between my log and your log. Thanks for the tip, I'll try to have a second look at the first two, following your advice. OK, the first two look like bugs that will be easier to understand with a diff (maybe a build-dep that was broken was fixed in the meantime?). For the third one, I'm a bit more puzzled. Note that I auto-retry builds before filing, so when I file a bug, it means that the build failed twice in a row. This does not exclude chroot configuration issues, or environment issues, but at least excludes all random/cosmic rays problems. Lucas ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#684828: backbone: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libnode-uglify
Source: backbone Version: 0.5.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: ┌──┐ │ Install backbone build dependencies (apt-based resolver) │ └──┘ Installing build dependencies Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: sbuild-build-depends-backbone-dummy : Depends: libnode-uglify but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. apt-get failed. The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/08/14/backbone_0.5.3-2_wheezy.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
