[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#736332: Bug#736332: Bug#736332: libv8-3.14: support for mips big endian

2014-04-04 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Tue, 2014-01-28 14:50:20 +0100, Luca BRUNO wrote:
 Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
 
 a similar question can be asked for v8-ppc port, too.  I need some
 help for taking a decision here.
 
 If those ports pass v8 test suites and are maintained, then we
 should consider having them in debian. I'm a little worried about
 security issues, though.
 
 The ideal world would be to only backport patches that have already
 been accepted upstream, but I realize this is infeasible in most of
 the cases.
 
 I'm a bit worried too about patching upstream for new features, but
 OTOH architecture porting shouldn't be too invasive. In this case, I
 believe that requiring some kind of upstream liveness check should be
 enough: as far as there's somebody updating the patches and reacting
 to requests/bugs, it's fine for me.

Hello Luca and Jérémy,

We (as I work for imgtec.com as well) will support this patch and it
will be submitted upstream.

I'll build libv8-3.14 again on mips and mipsel with Jurica's patch
posted at:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736332#30

Regards,

Aníbal

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#736332: Bug#736332: Bug#736332: libv8-3.14: support for mips big endian

2014-01-28 Thread Luca BRUNO
Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:

 Hi,
 a similar question can be asked for v8-ppc port, too.
 I need some help for taking a decision here.
 
 If those ports pass v8 test suites and are maintained, then we should
 consider having them in debian. I'm a little worried about security
 issues, though.

The ideal world would be to only backport patches that have already
been accepted upstream, but I realize this is infeasible in most of
the cases.

I'm a bit worried too about patching upstream for new features, but
OTOH architecture porting shouldn't be too invasive. In this case, I
believe that requiring some kind of upstream liveness check should be
enough: as far as there's somebody updating the patches and reacting to
requests/bugs, it's fine for me.

Just my 2¢, Luca

-- 
  .''`.  |   ~[ Luca BRUNO ~ (kaeso) ]~
 : :'  : | Email: lucab (AT) debian.org ~ Debian Developer
 `. `'`  | GPG Key ID: 0x3BFB9FB3   ~ Free Software supporter
   `-| HAM-radio callsign: IZ1WGT   ~ Networking sorcerer

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#736332: Bug#736332: Bug#736332: libv8-3.14: support for mips big endian

2014-01-24 Thread Jérémy Lal
Hi,
a similar question can be asked for v8-ppc port, too.
I need some help for taking a decision here.

If those ports pass v8 test suites and are maintained, then we should
consider having them in debian. I'm a little worried about security
issues, though.

Jérémy.

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel