Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

2015-11-06 Thread Ross Gammon 
On 11/05/2015 05:11 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> 
> 
> 2015-11-05 17:04 GMT+01:00 Bas Couwenberg  >:
> 
> On 2015-11-05 16:59, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> 
> On 2015-11-05 09:52:19, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> 
> The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to
> kosmtic:
> 
> https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik
> 
> 
> is that a fork of tilemill? how does it differ?
> 
> 
> It's not a fork. It's not a Mapbox project.
> 
> maybe a new ITP should be opened for this then?
> 
> 
> It's still alpha, but shows much more promise than mapbox-studio as
> an alternative to tilemill.
> 
> If you want to spend time packaging an alternative for tilemill, I
> think kosmtik is your best option.
> 
> 
> Indeed it looks like an alternative to tilemill.
> Mapbox studio classic is not really as good, and to be released mapbox
> studio (but i don't know when)
> is very promising.

Every now and then I try running tilemill from the github source tree to
see if it is close to something that could be packaged. But I didn't
have success the last couple of times. There is certainly no sniff of a
coming release. It is a shame considering all of the hard work Dave put
in to package all the dependencies.

Not knowing about kosmtk, I started working on mapbox (the one released
in npm):
https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Tasks/mapbox-studio
Feel free to grab one of the dependencies to package if you are looking
for work.

But kosmtik certainly looks like it would be a much quicker win, and a
better place to start:
$ npm2deb depends kosmtik
Dependencies:
NPM   Debian
kosmtik (0.0.12)  None
├─ carto (^0.15.2)node-carto (0.9.5-2)
├─ generic-pool (^2.2.0)  node-generic-pool
(2.0.3-1)
├─ js-yaml (^3.4.2)   None
├─ json-localizer (0.0.3) None
├─ leaflet (^0.7.3)   None
├─ leaflet-formbuilder (^0.2.0)   None
├─ leaflet-hash (^0.2.1)  None
├─ mapnik (^3.4.7)node-mapnik
(1.2.3-1build1)
├─ nomnom (^1.8.1)None
├─ npm (^3.3.5)   None
├─ request (^2.64.0)  node-request (2.26.1-1)
└─ semver (^5.0.3)node-semver (2.1.0-2)

Build dependencies:
NPM   Debian
mocha (^2.2.5)node-mocha (1.20.1-1)

I will do an ITP & create a task page over the weekend. But please jump
in when/if any of you like. My current work rate is not very high (one
package every other day).

Cheers,

Ross



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

2015-11-05 Thread Antoine Beaupré 
On 2015-11-05 09:52:19, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic:
>
> https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik

is that a fork of tilemill? how does it differ?

maybe a new ITP should be opened for this then?

-- 
C'est avec les pierres de la loi qu'on a bâti les prisons,
et avec les briques de la religion, les bordels.
- Blake, William

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

2015-11-05 Thread Bas Couwenberg 

On 2015-11-05 16:59, Antoine Beaupré wrote:

On 2015-11-05 09:52:19, Bas Couwenberg wrote:

The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic:

https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik


is that a fork of tilemill? how does it differ?


It's not a fork. It's not a Mapbox project.


maybe a new ITP should be opened for this then?


It's still alpha, but shows much more promise than mapbox-studio as an 
alternative to tilemill.


If you want to spend time packaging an alternative for tilemill, I think 
kosmtik is your best option.


Kind Regards,

Bas

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

2015-11-05 Thread Jérémy Lal 
2015-11-05 17:04 GMT+01:00 Bas Couwenberg :

> On 2015-11-05 16:59, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
>> On 2015-11-05 09:52:19, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>
>>> The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik
>>>
>>
>> is that a fork of tilemill? how does it differ?
>>
>
> It's not a fork. It's not a Mapbox project.
>
> maybe a new ITP should be opened for this then?
>>
>
> It's still alpha, but shows much more promise than mapbox-studio as an
> alternative to tilemill.
>
> If you want to spend time packaging an alternative for tilemill, I think
> kosmtik is your best option.
>
>
Indeed it looks like an alternative to tilemill.
Mapbox studio classic is not really as good, and to be released mapbox
studio (but i don't know when)
is very promising.


Jérémy
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

2015-11-05 Thread Bas Couwenberg 

The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic:

https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel