Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-emoji 1.4.1
On തിങ്കള് 12 ഡിസംബര് 2016 03:08 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Can someone push this through ? The more I think about it the more I am > convinced that node-emoji is OK I had to fix filename in pristine-tar branch to get it to build. I have uploaded it. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-emoji 1.4.1
On 03/12/2016 16:49, Paolo Greppi wrote: > On 03/12/2016 06:57, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> On ശനി 03 ഡിസംബര് 2016 06:46 രാവിലെ, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>> Bad move :) >>> What if a module is named "emoji" ? Then you'll have node-emoji >>> conflict with it. >>> node-node-emoji is the right name here. >> >> I think this is over engineering. We add node- prefix so we can have the >> same library in other languages like ruby-emoji, python-emoji etc. >> >> As for having an unlikely node-emoji and emoji modules, we can choose to >> support the better one and patch its reverse dependencies in most cases. >> If that option is not working, I think node-node- should be a last resort. > > Actually there is already a module in the npm registry called "emoji" > https://www.npmjs.com/package/emoji > but it seems less popular (963 downloads in the last month against > 1.856.808 downloads in the same period for node-emoji). The github repo > is also stuck at 2014-07-05 whereas node-emoji is more active. > > The policy within Debian is whoever gets there first can get hold of a > package name but I'd prefer to reach a consensus among us. > > Paolo Can someone push this through ? The more I think about it the more I am convinced that node-emoji is OK Paolo -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-emoji 1.4.1
On 03/12/2016 06:57, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ശനി 03 ഡിസംബര് 2016 06:46 രാവിലെ, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> Bad move :) >> What if a module is named "emoji" ? Then you'll have node-emoji >> conflict with it. >> node-node-emoji is the right name here. > > I think this is over engineering. We add node- prefix so we can have the > same library in other languages like ruby-emoji, python-emoji etc. > > As for having an unlikely node-emoji and emoji modules, we can choose to > support the better one and patch its reverse dependencies in most cases. > If that option is not working, I think node-node- should be a last resort. Actually there is already a module in the npm registry called "emoji" https://www.npmjs.com/package/emoji but it seems less popular (963 downloads in the last month against 1.856.808 downloads in the same period for node-emoji). The github repo is also stuck at 2014-07-05 whereas node-emoji is more active. The policy within Debian is whoever gets there first can get hold of a package name but I'd prefer to reach a consensus among us. Paolo signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
