Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-absolute-path_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2015-07-13 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Thorsten,

Thanks for the further rejections.

On 07/13/2015 10:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Thanks for finally rejecting packages too small to meet the criteria.
>>
>> What about node-nextback?
> 
> I didn't want to spoil your weekend, so I started with only two packages.

Don't worry about that, I have plenty of other (non-Node.js) packages to
keep my occupied.

>> It's probably better to reject all remaining Node.js packages I've
>> uploaded, as I'm giving up on the OpenLayers 3 packaging.
> 
> Ok, sorry.

No problem.

Can you also reject the remaining node-* packages I've got left in NEW?

 node-junk
 node-mkpath
 node-buffers
 node-binary
 node-touch

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-absolute-path_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2015-07-13 Thread Thorsten Alteholz

Hi Bas,

On Sun, 12 Jul 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:

Thanks for finally rejecting packages too small to meet the criteria.

What about node-nextback?


I didn't want to spoil your weekend, so I started with only two packages.


It's probably better to reject all remaining Node.js packages I've
uploaded, as I'm giving up on the OpenLayers 3 packaging.


Ok, sorry.

  Thorsten


___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-absolute-path_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2015-07-12 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Thorsten,

Thanks for finally rejecting packages too small to meet the criteria.

On 07/12/2015 01:00 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> this has the same problem as node-isarray ...

What about node-nextback?

It is required for node-gaze along with node-absolute-path to fix #784350.

Since we don't have an acceptable solution for bundling these small
Node.js packages, I won't be able to complete the OpenLayers 3 packaging.

It's probably better to reject all remaining Node.js packages I've
uploaded, as I'm giving up on the OpenLayers 3 packaging.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-absolute-path_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2015-07-11 Thread Thorsten Alteholz

this has the same problem as node-isarray ...

  Thorsten

===

Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.


___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel