Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
Le mardi 06 mai 2014 à 10:23 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : > On 6 May 2014 08:01, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > I worked on it - and then stopped because we're missing component.js :( > > Am I missing something? Why should we care about component ? (you cut a little too far here - i don't know what we were talking about) oh yes css-parse A css parser is also useful on browser, i bet mocha too. Obviously we won't be able to libjs-package these for now. I feel bad about that. Jérémy. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
On 6 May 2014 08:01, Jérémy Lal wrote: > I worked on it - and then stopped because we're missing component.js :( Am I missing something? Why should we care about component ? ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
On 6 May 2014 08:01, Jérémy Lal wrote: > I worked on it - and then stopped because we're missing component.js :( Am I missing something? Why should we care about component ? -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25 ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
On 6 May 2014 08:01, Jérémy Lal wrote: > I worked on it - and then stopped because we're missing component.js :( Am I missing something? Why should we care about component ? ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
Le mardi 06 mai 2014 à 00:34 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : > On 5 May 2014 23:20, Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> The note says: "Based on the Base 64 VLQ implementation in Closure > >> Compiler", > >> > >> should I report this in debian/copryright ? > > > > Yes, the file has two copyright holders (and two licenses which happen > > to be identical). > > Good! (locally done, I will "git push" asap). > > About node-css-parse .. Jeremy (do you want contribute maintaining the > package?).. ? > New css are now in upstream, but no new release with those changes. > What we should do? > > L. > I worked on it - and then stopped because we're missing component.js :( Jérémy. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
On 5 May 2014 23:20, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> The note says: "Based on the Base 64 VLQ implementation in Closure Compiler", >> >> should I report this in debian/copryright ? > > Yes, the file has two copyright holders (and two licenses which happen > to be identical). Good! (locally done, I will "git push" asap). About node-css-parse .. Jeremy (do you want contribute maintaining the package?).. ? New css are now in upstream, but no new release with those changes. What we should do? L. -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25 ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
Le lundi 05 mai 2014 à 23:08 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : > Hi all, > > about source-map module, > > I have found the following in lib/source-map/base64-vlq.js > > /* > * Copyright 2011 Mozilla Foundation and contributors > * Licensed under the New BSD license. See LICENSE or: > * http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause > * > * Based on the Base 64 VLQ implementation in Closure Compiler: > * > https://code.google.com/p/closure-compiler/source/browse/trunk/src/com/google/debugging/sourcemap/Base64VLQ.java > * > * Copyright 2011 The Closure Compiler Authors. All rights reserved. > * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are > * met: > * > * * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright > *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. > * * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above > *copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following > *disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided > *with the distribution. > * * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its > *contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived > *from this software without specific prior written permission. > * > * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS > * "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT > * LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR > * A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT > * OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, > * SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT > * LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, > * DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY > * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT > * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE > * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. > */ > > > The note says: "Based on the Base 64 VLQ implementation in Closure Compiler", > > should I report this in debian/copryright ? Yes, the file has two copyright holders (and two licenses which happen to be identical). Jérémy. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
Hi all, about source-map module, I have found the following in lib/source-map/base64-vlq.js /* * Copyright 2011 Mozilla Foundation and contributors * Licensed under the New BSD license. See LICENSE or: * http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause * * Based on the Base 64 VLQ implementation in Closure Compiler: * https://code.google.com/p/closure-compiler/source/browse/trunk/src/com/google/debugging/sourcemap/Base64VLQ.java * * Copyright 2011 The Closure Compiler Authors. All rights reserved. * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are * met: * * * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above *copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following *disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided *with the distribution. * * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its *contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived *from this software without specific prior written permission. * * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS * "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT * LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR * A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT * OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, * SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT * LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, * DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. */ The note says: "Based on the Base 64 VLQ implementation in Closure Compiler", should I report this in debian/copryright ? ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
On 1 May 2014 02:10, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 01:11 +0200, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
>> Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 00:18 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>> > Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-04-30 23:26:44)
>> > > On 30 April 2014 23:11, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> > > > It's not all right to remove other files without good reasons.
>> > > > Here, you can have a doubt about the license of the other css file, but
>> > > > there is no doubt the js file is correctly licensed, so no reason to
>> > > > prune it.
>> > >
>> > > But ... does it make sense leave snip of code that does not work?
>> > >
>> > > I mean, if you `apt-get source' the package you will see run
>> > > bechmark/index.js. You may want to exec it.. and then??
>> > > It fails.. because try to open large.css, excluded from source.
>> > >
>> > > $ grep css benchmark/index.js
>> > > var small = fs.readFileSync('benchmark/small.css', 'utf8');
>> > > var large = fs.readFileSync('benchmark/large.css', 'utf8')
>> > >
>> > > Is it not better in this case remove the whole directory?
>> >
>> > The better approach is not to remove more code, but to complement the
>> > minimal code stripping with a patch that makes the remaining code work
>> > again.
>>
>> Even better, let's bug upstream about that. After all they have no
>> interest in keeping licensing issues.
>
> https://github.com/reworkcss/css-parse/issues/84
>
> I'll file a PR later, let's see what happens.
Thanks you both :)
Have a great day!
Leo.
--
Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on
Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com
GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
On 30 April 2014 22:25, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 22:11 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : >> node-character-parser is ready here: >> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-character-parser.git > > The long description is not clear enough. > Also it uses "you" where we expect something less personal. Updated :). -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25 ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 01:11 +0200, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
> Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 00:18 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-04-30 23:26:44)
> > > On 30 April 2014 23:11, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > > > It's not all right to remove other files without good reasons.
> > > > Here, you can have a doubt about the license of the other css file, but
> > > > there is no doubt the js file is correctly licensed, so no reason to
> > > > prune it.
> > >
> > > But ... does it make sense leave snip of code that does not work?
> > >
> > > I mean, if you `apt-get source' the package you will see run
> > > bechmark/index.js. You may want to exec it.. and then??
> > > It fails.. because try to open large.css, excluded from source.
> > >
> > > $ grep css benchmark/index.js
> > > var small = fs.readFileSync('benchmark/small.css', 'utf8');
> > > var large = fs.readFileSync('benchmark/large.css', 'utf8')
> > >
> > > Is it not better in this case remove the whole directory?
> >
> > The better approach is not to remove more code, but to complement the
> > minimal code stripping with a patch that makes the remaining code work
> > again.
>
> Even better, let's bug upstream about that. After all they have no
> interest in keeping licensing issues.
https://github.com/reworkcss/css-parse/issues/84
I'll file a PR later, let's see what happens.
Jérémy.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 00:18 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-04-30 23:26:44)
> > On 30 April 2014 23:11, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > > It's not all right to remove other files without good reasons.
> > > Here, you can have a doubt about the license of the other css file, but
> > > there is no doubt the js file is correctly licensed, so no reason to
> > > prune it.
> >
> > But ... does it make sense leave snip of code that does not work?
> >
> > I mean, if you `apt-get source' the package you will see run
> > bechmark/index.js. You may want to exec it.. and then??
> > It fails.. because try to open large.css, excluded from source.
> >
> > $ grep css benchmark/index.js
> > var small = fs.readFileSync('benchmark/small.css', 'utf8');
> > var large = fs.readFileSync('benchmark/large.css', 'utf8')
> >
> > Is it not better in this case remove the whole directory?
>
> The better approach is not to remove more code, but to complement the
> minimal code stripping with a patch that makes the remaining code work
> again.
Even better, let's bug upstream about that. After all they have no
interest in keeping licensing issues.
Jérémy.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-04-30 23:26:44)
> On 30 April 2014 23:11, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > It's not all right to remove other files without good reasons.
> > Here, you can have a doubt about the license of the other css file, but
> > there is no doubt the js file is correctly licensed, so no reason to
> > prune it.
>
> But ... does it make sense leave snip of code that does not work?
>
> I mean, if you `apt-get source' the package you will see run
> bechmark/index.js. You may want to exec it.. and then??
> It fails.. because try to open large.css, excluded from source.
>
> $ grep css benchmark/index.js
> var small = fs.readFileSync('benchmark/small.css', 'utf8');
> var large = fs.readFileSync('benchmark/large.css', 'utf8')
>
> Is it not better in this case remove the whole directory?
The better approach is not to remove more code, but to complement the
minimal code stripping with a patch that makes the remaining code work
again.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
On 30 April 2014 23:11, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> It's not all right to remove other files without good reasons.
> Here, you can have a doubt about the license of the other css file, but
> there is no doubt the js file is correctly licensed, so no reason to
> prune it.
But ... does it make sense leave snip of code that does not work?
I mean, if you `apt-get source' the package you will see run
bechmark/index.js. You may want to exec it.. and then??
It fails.. because try to open large.css, excluded from source.
$ grep css benchmark/index.js
var small = fs.readFileSync('benchmark/small.css', 'utf8');
var large = fs.readFileSync('benchmark/large.css', 'utf8')
Is it not better in this case remove the whole directory?
--
Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on
Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com
GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 22:55 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : > On 30 April 2014 22:20, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 21:48 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : > >> node-css-parse is ready here: > >> > >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git > > > > * upstream is actually > > https://github.com/reworkcss/css-parse > > You're right, visionmedia repo actually redirects on reworkcss. > Fixed. > > > * benchmarks/large.css must be excluded, for it contains way too much > > unlicensed styles > > Added to copyright: > Files-Excluded: > benchmark > > We do not need any of them. Oops, too much :) It's not all right to remove other files without good reasons. Here, you can have a doubt about the license of the other css file, but there is no doubt the js file is correctly licensed, so no reason to prune it. Jérémy. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
On 30 April 2014 22:20, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 21:48 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : >> node-css-parse is ready here: >> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git > > * upstream is actually > https://github.com/reworkcss/css-parse You're right, visionmedia repo actually redirects on reworkcss. Fixed. > * benchmarks/large.css must be excluded, for it contains way too much > unlicensed styles Added to copyright: Files-Excluded: benchmark We do not need any of them. Regards, L. -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25 ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 22:11 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : > node-character-parser is ready here: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-character-parser.git > > On 30 April 2014 21:48, Leo Iannacone wrote: > > node-css-parse is ready here: > > > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git The long description is not clear enough. Also it uses "you" where we expect something less personal. Jérémy. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 21:48 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : > node-css-parse is ready here: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git * upstream is actually https://github.com/reworkcss/css-parse * benchmarks/large.css must be excluded, for it contains way too much unlicensed styles * version 2.0.0 might happen soon (or not), but i'm okay with 1.7.0 right now. Jérémy. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
node-character-parser is ready here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-character-parser.git On 30 April 2014 21:48, Leo Iannacone wrote: > node-css-parse is ready here: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25 ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian
node-css-parse is ready here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
