Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-crc32_0.2.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable
On 12/31/2017 02:54 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Ha, node-gzip-js is also outdated - it has a similar better alternative > https://github.com/nodeca/pako > > I see that node-jquery uses gzip-js only to compress dist files, no ? > It's easy to get rid of that dependency since nodejs has the zlib module > that can compress to gzip. > > Jérémy > > Can you check if this is correct? https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/node-jquery.git/tree/debian/patches/skip-gzip-js.patch signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-crc32_0.2.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable
2017-12-31 7:04 GMT+01:00 Pirate Praveen : > On 12/31/2017 04:51 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > Sorry if i did not catch this ITP first hand but may i point out that > there are some > much more popular (by several orders of magnitude), and better maintained > (crc32 is six years old) alternatives out there: > https://github.com/SheetJS/js-crc32 > https://github.com/alexgorbatchev/node-crc > > This would probably means patches for the dependent module using crc32, > yes, > but 1. upstream of that dependent module should consider switching > and 2. the six years old module will probably require patches as well. > > This is a dependency of node-gzip-js (dependency of node-jquery 2). We can > try and convince upstream to update dependency. > Ha, node-gzip-js is also outdated - it has a similar better alternative https://github.com/nodeca/pako I see that node-jquery uses gzip-js only to compress dist files, no ? It's easy to get rid of that dependency since nodejs has the zlib module that can compress to gzip. Jérémy -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-crc32_0.2.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable
On 12/31/2017 04:51 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Sorry if i did not catch this ITP first hand but may i point out that > there are some > much more popular (by several orders of magnitude), and better maintained > (crc32 is six years old) alternatives out there: > https://github.com/SheetJS/js-crc32 > https://github.com/alexgorbatchev/node-crc > > This would probably means patches for the dependent module using > crc32, yes, > but 1. upstream of that dependent module should consider switching > and 2. the six years old module will probably require patches as well. > This is a dependency of node-gzip-js (dependency of node-jquery 2). We can try and convince upstream to update dependency. > Jérémy signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-crc32_0.2.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable
2017-12-30 20:00 GMT+01:00 Debian FTP Masters < ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org>: > > > Accepted: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Format: 1.8 > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:29:28 +0530 > Source: node-crc32 > Binary: node-crc32 > Architecture: source all > Version: 0.2.2-1 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: low > Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers alioth.debian.org> > Changed-By: Pirate Praveen > Description: > node-crc32 - CRC-32 implemented in JavaScript > Closes: 883188 > Changes: > node-crc32 (0.2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Initial release (Closes: #883188) > Sorry if i did not catch this ITP first hand but may i point out that there are some much more popular (by several orders of magnitude), and better maintained (crc32 is six years old) alternatives out there: https://github.com/SheetJS/js-crc32 https://github.com/alexgorbatchev/node-crc This would probably means patches for the dependent module using crc32, yes, but 1. upstream of that dependent module should consider switching and 2. the six years old module will probably require patches as well. Jérémy -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
