Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] whether or not to sometimes remove questionably useful binaries from node modules

2014-07-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Jérémy Lal (2014-07-01 16:35:59) > Andrew, modifications you make to the upstream files are supposed to > be done in one of two ways (and directly removing files from the gbp > repository is not a way): > > - repackage upstream tarball to exclude files for DFSG reasons > The simplest way

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] whether or not to sometimes remove questionably useful binaries from node modules

2014-07-01 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le mardi 01 juillet 2014 à 04:58 +, Felipe Sateler a écrit : > On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:59:03 -0700, Andrew Kelley wrote: > > > from #debian-multimedia > > > > andrewrk: why did you remove the ncp binary? > > fsateler, it clutters up the global bin namespace, and why > > would you ever use it

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] whether or not to sometimes remove questionably useful binaries from node modules

2014-07-01 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:59:03 -0700, Andrew Kelley wrote: > from #debian-multimedia > > andrewrk: why did you remove the ncp binary? > fsateler, it clutters up the global bin namespace, and why > would you ever use it instead of plain old cp ? > it seems common for node module authors to includ

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] whether or not to sometimes remove questionably useful binaries from node modules

2014-07-01 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le lundi 30 juin 2014 à 18:59 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit : > from #debian-multimedia > > andrewrk: why did you remove the ncp binary? > fsateler, it clutters up the global bin namespace, and why would > you ever use it instead of plain old cp ? it doesn't clutter the namespace, unless the nam