Processed: fixed 403798 in 1.7.2-1

2009-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: fixed 403798 1.7.2-1 Bug#403798: john: don't clobber the default restore file name Bug marked as fixed in version 1.7.2-1. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: setting package to john-data john, tagging 512158

2009-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: #john (1.7.3.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * debian/README.wordlists: typo fixed (Closes: #512158) # package john-data john Ignoring bugs not assigned to: john john-data tags 512158 + pending confirmed Bug#512158: typo in

Processed: unarchiving 360591, reopening 360591

2009-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: unarchive 360591 Bug 360591 [john] documentation gives incorrect paths for some files (john.pot, restore, etc.) Unarchived Bug 360591 reopen 360591 Bug#360591: documentation gives incorrect paths for some files (john.pot, restore, etc.) Bug

Processed: setting package to john-data john, tagging 360591, tagging 485422

2009-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: #john (1.7.3.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * debian/man/john.8: #- updated the locations of john's session files (Closes: #360591) #- updated descriptions of --rules and --test (Closes: #485422) # package john-data john Ignoring

KRB5 implementation for JtR, free license

2009-01-18 Thread David Paleino
Hello, I'm writing to you because I was adding the KRB5 implementation patch to JtR, and you're listed as the author in src/KRB5_fmt.c (the copyright holder is not a human, but I believe you could have contacts there). However, to be able to include the patch in Debian, we need a free license.

Re: KRB5 implementation for JtR, free license

2009-01-18 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:58:01 +0100, David Paleino wrote: Hello, [..] Also, please keep the list CCed, so that we have a public record of anything. Thank you, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/

Invision PowerBoard2 module for JtR, copyright issues

2009-01-18 Thread David Paleino
Hello, as already wrote about DOMINOSEC, I'm missing a copyright holder for the IPB2 module and any licensing statement. The same rules apply here. Also, please keep an eye on http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-john-devel/2009-January/000232.html if you want your modules to be

NSLDAP/OPENLDAPS modules fro JtR, copyright issues

2009-01-18 Thread David Paleino
Hello, I'm writing to you because you're listed as copyright holder in src/NSLDAP_fmt.c and src/OPENLDAP_fmt.c . Those files are missing a licensing statement though: please choose a DFSG-free one to ease inclusion into the Debian package for john, and also keep an eye on

Releasing to Public Domain (was: Re: JtR add-on licenses)

2009-01-18 Thread David Paleino
(CCing debian-legal, so that they could give advice. Full thread at http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-john-devel/2009-January/000232.html ) On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:40:11 +0300, Solar Designer wrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 06:03:07PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: However, I

Re: Lotus5 module for JtR, copyright issues

2009-01-18 Thread bartavelle
David Paleino wrote: Hello, Hi, I wanted to integrate the Lotus5 module into the Debian package of john. Some issues were encountered in src/lotus5_fmt.c, and I'm writing you because that's the only contact available in the source code. 1) Is Jeff Fay contactable in any way? A contact

Re: MD5 for JtR, copyright issues

2009-01-18 Thread bartavelle
David Paleino wrote: (please keep the list CCed) Hello David, Balázs, bartavelle, I'm integrating some patches into Debian's package of john. Let me expose different issues I encountered in this mail :-) Bartavelle, Balázs Bucsay and David Luyer: src/rawMD5go_fmt.c this file is missing

Re: Lotus5 module for JtR, copyright issues

2009-01-18 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:54:30 +0100, bartavelle wrote: David Paleino wrote: Hello, Hi, Thank you for your fast reply. I wanted to integrate the Lotus5 module into the Debian package of john. Some issues were encountered in src/lotus5_fmt.c, and I'm writing you because that's the only

Re: NSLDAP/OPENLDAPS modules fro JtR, copyright issues

2009-01-18 Thread bartavelle
David Paleino wrote: Bartavelle, those files are also missing copyright years for you (and the usual Copyright holder-issue). Hello, I don't have the CVS for these files anymore, so let's say it's from 2007 for me. -- Pkg-john-devel mailing list

Re: MD5-Apache module for JtR, copyright issues

2009-01-18 Thread Kostas Evangelinos
| I'm writing to you because you're listed as the copyright holders for | src/MD5_apache_fmt.c. Trying to include it in the official Debian package, I | found that the file does not carry any licensing statement. | | Please choose a DFSG-free license -- you might also want to keep an eye on |

revisions of patches to use (was: Releasing to Public Domain)

2009-01-18 Thread Solar Designer
David, On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 06:51:55PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:40:11 +0300, Solar Designer wrote: Well, I think you could include 1.7.3.1 in Debian without the patches initially. You don't have to apply them. Sure I could. But then I would forget about them,