[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#952426: digikam: digkam experimental not correctly instalable
On 24/02/2020 11:38, Eric Valette wrote: > On 24/02/2020 10:50, Simon Frei wrote: > >> one is 103. That suggests you aren't running the digikam binary from the >> package, but something else (maybe you self-compiled at some point?). >> Check the output of which digikam. > > > Did you just test your packages before uploading? > > ldd /usr/bin/digikam | grep libhd > libhdf5_serial.so.103 => > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdf5_serial.so.103 (0x7fd2c60f2000) > libhdf5_serial_hl.so.100 => not found > Firstly: I don't upload digikam to debian. I am just a user interested in having it packaged and very occasional contributor upstream. By helping to triage and clarify bugs I hope to remove some workload from Steve (uploader), which hopefully makes it more likely to keep getting packages from him (thanks a lot for that!). And my bad, apparently libhdf5-103 still ships the .100 lib: libhdf5-103: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdf5_serial_hl.so.100 At least it does in testing. I now upgraded libhdf5-103 to experimental and I do get the same error you do. Maybe at the time the experimental build was done the old version of hdf5 was still in experimental. Anyway the fix for you is to downgrade libhdf5-103 to unstable and for the package probably as simple as a rebuild (which in my opinion isn't really necessary unless there's another change, e.g. beta3). ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#952426: digikam: digkam experimental not correctly instalable
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:14:54 +0100 Eric Valette wrote: > digikam > digikam: error while loading shared libraries: libhdf5_serial_hl.so.100: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > Has already been reported. Did you just copy the error message from there, or did this error come up with the package from experimental installed? > But in addition, > > LANG="C" apt-get -t experimental install libhdf5-hl-100 That package isn't in experimental, so the error you get is entirely expected. Digikam in experimental (4:7.0.0~beta2+dfsg-1) does depend on hdf, but a different version: i digikam Depends digikam-private-libs (= 4:7.0.0~beta2+dfsg-1) i A digikam-private-libs Depends libopencv-imgcodecs4.2 (>= 4.2.0+dfsg) i A libopencv-imgcodecs4.2 Depends libgdal26 (>= 2.0.1) i A libgdal26 Depends libhdf5-103 The error message you quote refers to so-version 100, while the required one is 103. That suggests you aren't running the digikam binary from the package, but something else (maybe you self-compiled at some point?). Check the output of which digikam. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#546403: kipi-plugins: includes Adobe DNG SDK, with problematic license
DNG support is still present in digiKam, COPYING-ADOBE is now found in core/libs/dngwriter. reassign 546403 digikam thanks ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#1014648: digikam: Unable to display .heic correctly
On 11/07/2022 07:25, Christian Marillat wrote: On 10 juil. 2022 22:10, Steven Robbins wrote: On Saturday, July 9, 2022 8:26:21 A.M. CDT Christian Marillat wrote: Package: digikam Version: 4:7.7.0-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Since the last version .heic files aren't displayed correctly. See attached screen capture. [...] But I only see that in digikam 7.7.0 that worked fine with 7.6.0 In the debian update to 7.7.0 ffmpeg was disable as debian switched to v5 while digikam still only supports the (still supported) v4, and digikam uses the ffmpeg library to handle .heic. (The more problems I see related to major library upgrades in debian, the less convinced I am that only supporting a single (major) version for all libraries really is a good idea. Then I again I am not the one doing the work, so I am definitely not complaining, just thinking.) ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
