On 25/02/2020 14:35, Eric Valette wrote:
I disagree with your interpretation :
I read since then the policy for the shared libraries and indeed only
libraries with the dynamic linker attribute NEEDED create dependencies.
So on this part you are perfectly right. However that does not explain
On 25/02/2020 10:38, Simon Frei wrote:
On 25/02/2020 10:27, Agustin Martin wrote:
There is still the problem of the undeclared digikam dependency on the
hdf5 stuff.
There's no such problem, digikam does not in itself depend on hdf5
(https://www.digikam.org/api/index.html#externaldeps). As I
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:07:40PM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> On 24/02/2020 12:57, Agustin Martin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to https://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/hdf5 there is a
> > new "libhdf5-hl-100" package in experimental. Looking into it, seems that
> >
Eric,
Thank you for the bug report. Per your question: I do indeed test before
uploading -- I've been using Digikam 7 since I uploaded last week.
On Monday, February 24, 2020 4:38:40 A.M. CST Eric Valette wrote:
> valette@tri-yann4:~$ digikam --version
> digikam: error while loading shared
On 24/02/2020 12:47, Agustin Martin wrote:
This bug has already been reported by me and fixed for 6.4
To be honest, it just disappeared for 6.4, bit I could not find an action
leading to that. According to "ldd -v /usr/bin/digikam" output digikam 5.9.0
had a dependency on
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:38:40AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> On 24/02/2020 10:50, Simon Frei wrote:
>
> > The error message you quote refers to so-version 100, while the required
> > one is 103. That suggests you aren't running the digikam binary from the
> > package, but something else (maybe
On 24/02/2020 12:57, Agustin Martin wrote:
Hi,
According to https://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/hdf5 there is a
new "libhdf5-hl-100" package in experimental. Looking into it, seems that
libhdf5_serial_hl.so.100 has been moved there, so installing that new package
should help in
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:09:58PM +0100, Simon Frei wrote:
> On 24/02/2020 11:38, Eric Valette wrote:
> > On 24/02/2020 10:50, Simon Frei wrote:
> >
> >> one is 103. That suggests you aren't running the digikam binary from the
> >> package, but something else (maybe you self-compiled at some
On 24/02/2020 11:38, Eric Valette wrote:
> On 24/02/2020 10:50, Simon Frei wrote:
>
>> one is 103. That suggests you aren't running the digikam binary from the
>> package, but something else (maybe you self-compiled at some point?).
>> Check the output of which digikam.
>
>
> Did you just test
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:14:54 +0100 Eric Valette
wrote:
> digikam
> digikam: error while loading shared libraries:
libhdf5_serial_hl.so.100: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
>
> Has already been reported.
Did you just copy the error message from there, or did this error
Package: digikam
Version: 4:7.0.0~beta2+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
digikam
digikam: error while loading shared libraries: libhdf5_serial_hl.so.100: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
Has already been reported.
But in addition,
11 matches
Mail list logo
