Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# not relevant for stable
tags 515283 + squeeze sid
Bug #515283 {Done: Riccardo Stagni unric...@email.it} [gcx] gcx: Depends on
GTK 1.2 and GLIB 1.2
Added tag(s) squeeze.
# the release goal wasn't set for lenny
tags 478545 + squeeze sid
Bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
## dear clint.
##
## release goals are release goals and not release blockers.
## please learn the difference and discuss this beforehand.
##
## thanks.
## severity 382189 serious
## Bug #382189 [nbd-server] no IPv6 support
## Severity
partitionmanager_1.0.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partitionmanager_1.0.1-2.dsc
partitionmanager_1.0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
partitionmanager_1.0.1-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
Accepted:
partitionmanager_1.0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/partitionmanager/partitionmanager_1.0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
partitionmanager_1.0.1-2.dsc
to main/p/partitionmanager/partitionmanager_1.0.1-2.dsc
partitionmanager_1.0.1-2_amd64.deb
to
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:32:13 +
with message-id e1nu0t7-0002ea...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#556051: fixed in partitionmanager 1.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #556051,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:32:13 +
with message-id e1nu0t7-0002ed...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#574907: fixed in partitionmanager 1.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #574907,
regarding partitionmanager: Please rebuild against parted 2.2
to be marked as done.
This
klibido_0.2.5-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
klibido_0.2.5-7.dsc
klibido_0.2.5-7.debian.tar.gz
klibido_0.2.5-7_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
___
Accepted:
klibido_0.2.5-7.debian.tar.gz
to main/k/klibido/klibido_0.2.5-7.debian.tar.gz
klibido_0.2.5-7.dsc
to main/k/klibido/klibido_0.2.5-7.dsc
klibido_0.2.5-7_amd64.deb
to main/k/klibido/klibido_0.2.5-7_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
klibido_0.2.5-7.dsc - source kde
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:32:45 +
with message-id e1nu1ph-0007ub...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#517299: fixed in klibido 0.2.5-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #517299,
regarding klibido: needs IPv6 support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:32:45 +
with message-id e1nu1ph-0007u5...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#513919: fixed in klibido 0.2.5-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #513919,
regarding klibido(GNU/k*BSD): spurious AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
to be marked as done.
This means that you
kde-style-qtcurve_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kde-style-qtcurve_1.2.0-1.dsc
kde-style-qtcurve_1.2.0.orig.tar.bz2
kde-style-qtcurve_1.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz
kde-style-qtcurve_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb
kwin-style-qtcurve_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb
gtk2-engines-qtcurve_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gtk2-engines-qtcurve_1.2.0-1.dsc
gtk2-engines-qtcurve_1.2.0.orig.tar.bz2
gtk2-engines-qtcurve_1.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz
gtk2-engines-qtcurve_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian
Accepted:
gtk2-engines-qtcurve_1.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/g/gtk2-engines-qtcurve/gtk2-engines-qtcurve_1.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz
gtk2-engines-qtcurve_1.2.0-1.dsc
to main/g/gtk2-engines-qtcurve/gtk2-engines-qtcurve_1.2.0-1.dsc
gtk2-engines-qtcurve_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb
to
Accepted:
kde-style-qtcurve_1.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/k/kde-style-qtcurve/kde-style-qtcurve_1.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz
kde-style-qtcurve_1.2.0-1.dsc
to main/k/kde-style-qtcurve/kde-style-qtcurve_1.2.0-1.dsc
kde-style-qtcurve_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
qtcurve_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
extra.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug,
Package: kmplayer
Version: 1:0.11.1b-2
Severity: minor
It seems that the dependency on libxine1-x is misplaced; there's no
dependency on libxine1 here. Since the Phonon xine backend depends on
libxine1 and relevant parts of X, that would be the proper place for this
dependency. (This is already
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail
=== bangarang:
= Missing build(s) on hppa
This might need manual action from your side.
See
17 matches
Mail list logo
