Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2013 10:38:50 +1100
with message-id <3108301.CCjNHAjz8m@acer>
and subject line Re: Bug#616629: provide a "digikam-nokde" like package
has caused the Debian Bug report #616629,
regarding provide a "digikam-nokde" like package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
616629: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616629
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: digikam
Version: 2:1.2.0-7
Severity: wishlist

Hi.

Well I'm not sure how far digikam is tied to KDE and how easy the
following is:

It would be nice to have an additional package that disables most/all
KDE integration/features of digikam, so that it more or less depends
only on qt.


The thing is, digikam is very nice, and IMHO there is nothing comparable
for GNOME/GTK.
Nevertheless people probably don't like to install "half" of KDE SC just
to use digikam.

Providing such packages is also not that uncommon, see e.g. the
different vim-* flavours, or packages like evince-gtk, which is like
evince but just without the GNOME integration.

If the package's CMake file already provides the necessarily build
options to disable the KDE stuff, maintaining such an additional binary
package should be of not much effort.


Thanks,
Chris.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 04:22:37 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Well I'm not sure how far digikam is tied to KDE and how easy the
> following is:
> 
> It would be nice to have an additional package that disables most/all
> KDE integration/features of digikam, so that it more or less depends
> only on qt.

Christoph,

digikam is very tied into KDE components, thus I doubt a -nokde version is 
possible.  However, please feel free to discuss with the digikam upstream:
http://www.digikam.org/support/

That said, digikam works very well under GNOME and other DEs.

Mark

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras

Reply via email to