On Sunday 11 October 2009 02:18:52 Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
Hi,
Hi Pascal,
I just mailed with Andrew Zabolotny, the author of LensFun. He's getting
current svn in shape for release as 0.2.4.
I see they have released in the last couple of days.
The new release of course has to be repackaged. No major changes as far
as I know...
I think we can drop most if not all patches for 0.2.4.
Excellent.
What about the remaining two in debian.svn.org?
90-lensfun-db-update-rel-to-svn65.dpatch
91-lensfun-db-update-svn65-to-pmjdebruijn.dpatch
They don't apply cleanly to 0.2.4.
However, there are some packaging issues I'm not entirely sure of...
The library is now called liblensfun0, I'm assuming that will remain the
same as long as the API is unchanged. It will only need to be renamed to
liblensfun1 if the API has changed, right?
Yes. Have a look at the Debian library packing guide:
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
Though there are some references to 0.2.3, in the debian package files:
rules:DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_ALL := -- -v0.2.3
liblensfun0.symbols: lf_lens_...@base 0.2.3
My understanding is that the symbols file only details the first version that
specific symbols appear. Thus the correct answer is to leave the symbols file
at 0.2.3.
The rules file is easily adapted, but how would I regenerate the symbols
file?
I don't think you need to change the rules file as 0.2.3 and 0.2.4 are binary
compatible, ie you can leave it at 0.2.3.
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
