kde-l10n in NEW, process please

2009-04-08 Thread Ana Guerrero
Hola, kde 4.2's translations are currently stuck at new only because they include a new translation (slovak), could you take a look at it please? Ana -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 11:52:36 Ana Guerrero wrote: So, what about: - kde-minimal (just rename current kde4-mininal) I am not sure kde-core longer fits. - kde-full (renamed from current kde4) I agree it is clearer than kde. - kde-development. Not only renamed from kde4-development, also

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Mié 08 Abr 2009 08:23:56 Peter Eisentraut escribió: [snip] Well, being able to say apt-get install kde would still be very handy. Yes, but it is a little bit confusing. Or perhaps I should say too lax. Typing some more clearer words it's a better politic imho. -- I am two fools, I know,

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:49:33AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: Welcome to the annual metapackages discussion. After the emails that followed my first mail, I have realized that certainly if the 4 in the meta packages is going to be killed, the sooner, the better. So, what about: -

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On 2009 m. April 8 d., Wednesday 14:23:56 Peter Eisentraut wrote: Well, being able to say apt-get install kde would still be very handy. The problem with kde package name is its ambiguousness. Full kde is not what users want most of the time. Now they will have to explicitly choose

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Rainer Kluge
Ana Guerrero schrieb: - kde-minimal (just rename current kde4-mininal) I am not sure kde-core longer fits. - kde-full (renamed from current kde4) I agree it is clearer than kde. The real question is about the need of the kde/kde4/kde-full package with all this game stuff and dependencies to

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 20:31:04 Rainer Kluge wrote: Ana Guerrero schrieb: - kde-minimal (just rename current kde4-mininal) I am not sure kde-core longer fits. - kde-full (renamed from current kde4) I agree it is clearer than kde. The real question is about the need of the

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 23:49:07 +0200 Sune Vuorela s...@vuorela.dk wrote: On Wednesday 08 April 2009 20:31:04 Rainer Kluge wrote: Ana Guerrero schrieb: - kde-minimal (just rename current kde4-mininal) I am not sure kde-core longer fits. - kde-full (renamed from current kde4) I agree it is

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thursday 09 April 2009 01:56:12 Scott Kitterman wrote: I think moving things (like games) that it's nice to provide to recommends, so they can be removed without removing the metapackage, will defuse a lot of the tension of these discussions. If it turns out a few too many things get added

Re: meta-kde4 and meta-kde

2009-04-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thursday 09 April 2009 00:49:07 Sune Vuorela wrote: What should be KDE? The thing that upstream ships as KDE? I think the kde package should be strongly related to what upstream ships when they say new KDE version released. That is the rule for pretty much all other packages, after all.