Hello,
On antradienis 03 Lapkritis 2009 00:53:10 George Kiagiadakis wrote:
> I will also need some time to learn the new format and adjust my
> scripts, but I don't mind switching to it. We could experiment with it
> during the 4.4 beta/rc cycles, if everybody has agreed till then. And
> maybe I'l
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As Sune: I'm fine for the tar.bz2 tarball but I need a closer look to
> dpkg-source format 3.0.
>
Hi,
I will also need some time to learn the new format and adjust my
scripts, but I don't mind switching to it. We could experiment
Hi all,
As Sune: I'm fine for the tar.bz2 tarball but I need a closer look to
dpkg-source format 3.0.
cheers,
Fathi
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
On Monday 02 November 2009 19:35:11 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since Debian ftpmasters have made it possible to upload source packages
> packaged in the next generation formats:
>
> 1) I don't see any blockers to use pristine KDE upstream tarballs anymore
> (renamed to appropriate orig.
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:35:11PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since Debian ftpmasters have made it possible to upload source packages
> packaged in the next generation formats:
>
> 1) I don't see any blockers to use pristine KDE upstream tarballs anymore
> (renamed to appropria
Hello,
since Debian ftpmasters have made it possible to upload source packages
packaged in the next generation formats:
1) I don't see any blockers to use pristine KDE upstream tarballs anymore
(renamed to appropriate orig.tar.bz2 of course).
2) What about dpkg-source format 3.0 (quilt) for al
